*sigh*

It doesn't matter if we lose at this point.

It is how we look to convince better players to sign up.

We didn't give them anything to give us more consideration.

What's the pitch?

"Oh our 4 and 5 stars suck but we need you to be a "Miami Guy" and fix this mess."

Recruits be like, "Why Ima come to Miami and be wasted so yall can tell tbe next rouund of recruits I was the problem?"

Recruits don't think like that. They're invincible, think they won't be like those upperclassmen, will get it fixed, they just need me. They see early playing time without realizing how much work they'll have to put in to get it.

Gotta just make it look fun like the first games. Clemson gave the blueprint though for opposing defense tonight.
 
Advertisement
Recruits don't think like that. They're invincible, think they won't be like those upperclassmen, will get it fixed, they just need me. They see early playing time without realizing how much work they'll have to put in to get it.

Gotta just make it look fun like the first games. Clemson gave the blueprint though for opposing defense tonight.

The ones crom Dade and Broward do think like that and rightfully so.

The rest of the season will be more like tbe first three games.

We had an oppor2and were not prepared for it.

If Lashlee learned his lesson and Manny gets ruthless with the defensive staff, we can build off this.

I hope the team responds well to this gut punch. I like the idea of them bouncing back hungry after being humbled by a champion.

I am still concerned about Manny. He has the head to learn his way to better perfor2. He has to prove he has the heart.
 
A cardinal rule on defense...never, ever run by an eligible receiver, I can't tell you how many times I saw that tonight. Matter of fact, go back and watch Clemson's 1st TD in the 2015 shellacking, Clemson scored their 1st TD last night on the same exact play out of the same exact formation...unreal.
 
Here is the summary of what this game really was.

It was a case study in what happens when you consistently lose games year in and year out that you SHOULD win. That leads to a negative perception from outsiders, namely the elite recruits and more importantly their parents. That leads to a failure in recruiting....and it ultimately manifests itself as the holes we currently have on the depth chart.

A University of Miami team that isn't on probation should NEVER be weak at WR, CB, or linebacker. It's honestly about the worst indictment you could place on ANY staff given where this program/school sits geographically.

No reasonably intelligent UM fan with any semblance of football acumen expected to beat Clemson tonight.....but what we were hoping to see was a team that would fight, compete, and at the very least put on a better show than Virginia did against this same Clemson squad.

Pressure is on Manny now. If he ends up with a 7 or 8 win season with a seasoned QB and OC the heat is going to get intense....and rightfully so. Take care of business against Pitt and Virginia and get this thing back on track in hurry because those are both winnable games that we need in order to help on the recruiting trail.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
I don't recall ever testing their LB's in the passing game. I don't recall any passes to the RB's. Don't recall a single screen to the RB's. Just bombs to the WR's and inside run.
I’m not a great X’s and O’s guy, but I was wondering throughout the game why we weren’t throwing screens. It seems that screens would have been an antidote to their pressure.
 
Its telling that the biggest passing play of Miami came from a freshman.

Its pretty telling when Clemson literally sends the box on every pass and no wide receiver is open. No one can make a play in 1vs1. Its a consistent disadvantage.

The score indicates how far we are away. And its not just that. Players were, once again, scared because of their surroundings. Clemson looked like it was a regular game for them.

I will still treat this as a bridge year. Cause there are too many players on this team that make me just shake my head.
 
It doesn't matter if we lose at this point.

It is how we look to convince better players to sign up.

We didn't give them anything to give us more consideration.

What's the pitch?

"Oh our 4 and 5 stars suck but we need you to be a "Miami Guy" and fix this mess."

Recruits be like, "Why Ima come to Miami and be wasted so yall can tell tbe next rouund of recruits I was the problem?"
Funny because it's so true.
 
Advertisement
I’m not a great X’s and O’s guy, but I was wondering throughout the game why we weren’t throwing screens. It seems that screens would have been an antidote to their pressure.
Take a number my man! I don't think anyone can figure that out.
 
I agree but that still doesn't explain why we never attempted to work the middle of the field. Everything was vertical and outside the hashes. I'm in disbelief. Why is Lash still trying to run inside zone in the 3rd quarter? Just an abysmal performance all around.

What really bothers me is that it's completely unexplainable. For what reason would he just keep putting his head down and purposely run into the same wall over and over and over? Lashlee never tried anything else. How in the fack does he explain that? It's almost ad if he just threw in the towel after the first quarter. No adjustments no screens nothing in the middle of the field. No crossing routes. The TEs were never involved. None of it makes any rational sense. He kept running inside zone when the alignment Clemson's DL was in was obviously shutting it down. Then that horrific 4th and 1 play call right up the middle to Knighton when it was obvious Clemson was sitting on that. No misdirection? King keeps that and he's still running. The whole thing is just bizarre! There must have been something going on behind the scenes. It's not that we lost to a better team that I am angry about. Clemson is a better team everyday of the week. It's Lashlee's totally inexplicable game plan and play calling that make no sense whatsoever. It's really baffling.
It almost seem like he was trying to throw the game are something... the way he just kept running into stacked boxes and then heave it up on third and long, looks like richt came up with our game plan.
 
It almost seem like he was trying to throw the game are something... the way he just kept running into stacked boxes and then heave it up on third and long, looks like richt came up with our game plan.
It's funny you say that about it looking like Lashlee was throwing the game. A friend of mine was saying that over and over during the game.
 
It's funny you say that about it looking like Lashlee was throwing the game. A friend of mine was saying that over and over during the game.
Forreal that is what that shidd legit felt and looked like... I mean go back and look at the play calling the last two games, you see a ton more different looks, check wit me's and play change depending on what the defense alignment was... tonight we saw none of that ****, it was like he reverted back to the UAB show nothing gameplan
 
Advertisement
Let's watch some film...


0:18 - Frierson is too busy starring at the QB to cover the WR who's running an out-route right in front of his face. Goes back to why I hate the way we play zone. We're not a "match" concept, we stand in spots and stare at the QB. If Frierson "mans" this WR up as soon as he enters his zone, this isn't an easy pitch and catch. Lawrence could've throw to the slot up top too. Why are we playing zone on 3rd & 3 anyway?

0:30 - Easy RPO pitch-and-catch here. Lawrence is reading Frierson. If Fri comes down on the run, Lawrence pulls and throws.

0:41 - This is what happens when you play that pussified "catch man" **** that Manny/Baker employ. When you play a true hands-on press, the CB can disrupt screens like this. But watch Blades. He's backing up on the snap. Combine that with the fact that we have our Safety playing way off, it's easy pitch-and-catch again. And I don't know what Bolden is looking at/doing. He's not even reacting at all, just sitting there watching the play unfold. The old "keep everything in front of you" game plan.

1:08 - Really clever throwback screen by Clemson here. Imagination on offense. Refreshing.

1:39 - Clemson employs basically a 3-4 Under front here. Their LB slices inside of our TE and completely blows the play up. TE doesn't block a soul.

2:00 - 3rd & long. Clemson blitzes and basically plays Cover-0 and drops two DL into underneath zones. Miami's WR's run "sticks" routes versus off coverage and it's a nice conversion.

2:30 - 3rd & 10 and Clemson is playing Cover-1-Man and sending the house. King has to know this ball needs to come out quick. Just because you need 10 yards doesn't mean the ball has to be THROWN 10 yards. He should look to the shorter routes in this scenario, maybe he should've tried Jordan on the out (whip route).

3:04 - We're in man coverage but I don't know who's covering Etienne. McCloud maybe? They run a delayed RB screen and McCloud gets caught up with the O-linemen. I mean, that's just Clemson's OC scheming up nice ****. We didn't see any of this from Lashlee.

3:17 - Simply bad gap integrity by Phillips here, being a bit selfish. Once he peaks inside to make a play that probably isn't his responsibility, he gives up outside contain.

3:28 - This is what happens when you insist on staying in 2-high coverage versus an H-back formation and a running QB. You get out-manned on the weak side. I don't know where McCloud is going, but it wouldn't have mattered anyway because the pulling Guard probably would've blocked him regardless. Manny/Baker need to roll that weak Safety down into the box versus a formation like this. OC's love putting the H-back strong and running to the weak side. We're absolutely clueless to this, as if it isn't a staple of most spread offenses right now. I freakin' saw this SAME PLAY in my high school opponents like 4 times last season. Columbus runs the **** out of it. IF YOU DON'T ROLL THAT WEAK SAFETY DOWN IN THE BOX IT'S EASY PICKENS. Why the **** is our weak Safety so deep anyway? WTF is he protecting us from versus this particular formation?!

3:47 - Careless, selfish, just plain fvckin' stupid. You get great defensive coverage and a chance to get off the field, and you dive into a sliding QB. Absolutely ridiculous, inexcusable play. As his coach I would be fvckin' livid. Instead I'm sure Baker and Co patted him on the butt while Jalar Holley danced to cheer him up.

4:10 - Clemson runs double screens. Common spread concept. Lawrence has a choice of which one to throw. This is how bad we are on defense. Lawrence makes the wrong decision because the flare/bubble screen is there. But we're so out of position that he has time to COME BACK TO IT and it's STILL WIDE OPEN! Now here lies the problem. I want you to watch Jennings and Davis. Jennings is reacting strictly to the QB instead of the initial receiving threat to his side. He should be reacting to the screen that is taking place ON HIS SIDE OF THE FIELD rather than letting Lawrence toy with him. GO RUN OUT THERE AND CHASE THE BUBBLE! Let the defenders on the left side of the defense worry about THAT screen. Watch Davis as well. He's reacting to the QB instead of diagnosing what's in front of him and reacting. You see a bubble screen in front of you, get off the block and go get it. Don't freakin' wait for the ball to be throw, by then it's too late. Bolden is nowhere to be found on the screen as well. This defense is just way too passive and reactionary. Just badddd bad coaching and overall coverage principles. This play is really embarrassing when you think about it. Love the part where Bolden gets ran over and talks ****. SMH

4:33 - Clemson's OC utilized creativity and he has answers. We're in man coverage on 3rd & long. Brooks has Etienne man-to-man before the snap, but since Etienne crosses the formation it now means Jennings has him. Jennings gets caught up with the Lineman and fails to force Etienne back inside. Off to the races. Clemson's OC clearly understands that you don't have to THROW THE BALL 10+ YARDS to gain 10+ yards.

5:44 - Man coverage by Clemson and every route we're running has a vertical release. Who's supposed to be open here?

6:09 - 3 & 19 makes things tough. Look at the routes here. Everything vertical release and outside the hashes. Nothing threatening the middle of the field.

6:53 - WTF are we doing here? LOL. It's 3rd & 16! Why are we even in Cover-2? The vertical at the top of the screen was open too!

7:06 - Look at the loose coverage Jordan is getting at the top of the screen. If I'm King that's the first place I'm looking when all I need is 6 yards. Even with that said, the crossing route probably could've got us the first down too. But in a situation like this, against a defense that hasn't given you much time to sit in the pocket, take the quicker route. (which is Jordan)

7:34 - 3 & 8. We're blitzing and playing man coverage. Nothing wrong with that call, Blades just gets toasted by one of the many elite South FLA WR's that left home. Which brings me to a point - Ladson is another one of the kids that people on this site said "wasn't that good anyway" when he chose to go OOS. Can we finally stop with this ****? Ladson, Stevenson, Surtain, Campbell, Tutu, Elijah Moore, etc. Every time a kid chooses an OOS school the sour grapes crews always respond with "well he's overrated anyway", then the kid goes to college and balls out. NEWS FLASH: These schools are way fvckin' better than us at evaluating, recruiting and developing talent. They don't come down here and sign "overrated" kids. The Georgia/Clemson/OSU/Bama staffs deserve the benefit of the doubt way before our staff does in regards to finding talent.

8:11 - 3rd & 9 and we give up a 15 yard out-route. This is the same exact coverage we were in when we gave up the 4th & 17 to North Carolina. The deep-out to the slot WR is always open in this coverage. Smith can't cover that route with inside leverage. He's there to protect against the slant or any in-breaking route. I just assume Miami is willing to give up the deep out because it's a hard throw.

8:46 - 3rd & 8. Clemson blitzes and plays man coverage. All routes are vertical and outside the hashes. SMH

9:17 - 3rd & 13. Clemson runs a blitz that looks like it's from Manny's playbook. Again, every route is vertical. Wiggins has no ability to adjust to the ball. He could've made a play here but he's not savvy.

9:44 - Clemson runs a fake toss/pop pass. Very nice design and pretty much impossible to defend, especially when you consider that the WR/TE pretended to block. But look how much creativity we've already seen from Clemson's OC during this first half. We saw nothing like this from Lashlee tonight. WTF happened to the Lashlee we saw in the Louisville game?

10:12 - Look at the gap that is created here after our DT's stunt/slant to the left. The Center and playside Guard don't have anyone to block anymore so they just move up to our LB's. The play before this we played straight-up and stuffed them, but we just HAD to get antsy and call some cute ****.


This is getting exhausting and depressing. Perhaps I'll finish the second half later.

 
We've still got a ways to go, fellas. Completely out-classed on all levels tonight. Embarrassed on the big stage once again, after a bye week, after "earning" a top-10 ranking.





*Lashlee
RUNNING GAME - I don't know WTF I watched tonight. It's like he went back to his UAB playbook. We saw ONE running play tonight, Inside Zone. Clemson employed an "Odd Tite" front during most running downs, which has the DE's line-up just inside the Offensive Tackles, making it almost impossible to run Inside Zone. There was very little effort from Lashlee to employ different running concepts. (maybe some Outside Zone, Counter or Speed Option?)WR

PASSNIG GAME - Hardly saw any Air Raid concepts tonight, everything was vertical and outside, which as I eluded to all week, are the lower percentage throws. Where were the crossing routes? Hitches? Slants? Venerables just left his CB's one-on-one with our WR's and dared us to throw deep. And we did. Over and over and over again with zero success. By the way, our WR corps is the product of poor recruiting and evaluations. We might have the worst WR talent I've seen at Miami in all my years of watching Cane's football. Even during the previous regime, we at least had ONE guy who could take the top off of a defense. (i.e. Phillip Dorsett or Travis Benjamin) We don't have anybody out there right now that scares opposing DC's, which is probably why any defense that plays press-man coverage versus us has success, even the FIU's and Dukes of the world. A guy like Tutu would've been nice to have tonight.


*Baker
I actually thought Baker called a decent game for the most part. He kept things pretty simple, we didn't see too much gimmicky stuff, did a good job spying Lawrence at times. There were still some fundamental/alignment issues that led to big plays. On Etienne's long TD run, we had no "overhang" player to the weak side. We were short-numbered. Of course Clemson was gonna pull Guards and run that way! People were giving McCloud **** for that play, but that was too much to ask of him. At the end of the day we still need better players. It's no coincidence that our only players on defense who flash are the 4/5 star guys. We're gonna need more of those because I don't know how well our staff can actually DEVELOP lower ranked guys.
It also doesn't help that we shot ourselves in the foot plenty times via timely penalties. Carter is a fvckin' crash dummy.

*Recruiting
I know a lot of yall love the underdog 3-star "developmental" types but for the most part the only players that looked like they belonged on the same field as Clemson were our 4/5 star guys. Sorry, it is what it is. That doesn't mean 3-star kids can't be good and help your team, cause lord knows I've lobbied for a few local ones, but WE HAVEN'T RECRUITED THE RIGHT ONES AT ALL. I thought the game plans on both offense and defense were very simple tonight. When the game plans are simple, you're relying on talent. And when it doesn't work, it's a lot easier to notice the talent deficiencies. Watching our outside WR's fail over and over again to exploit man coverage makes it very easy to see. There's no scheme involved there, it's just talent versus talent. I mean, they couldn't even adjust to the football while it was in the air and the CB's backs were turned. None of our upperclassmen WR's will even see an NFL try-out IMO. Then watching Blades get beat on slants, drop a pick-6 and give up a man-to-man deep ball on 3rd & long makes us realize that it would be nice to have at least ONE of those elite local CB's that we've missed on over the last few years.

*Culture
Poorly coached teams with questionable culture always act like we do during adversity and/or losses. Trash talking while you're getting blown out, tons of unnecessary unsportsmanlike penalties, bone-headed plays during money downs that prevent your defense from getting off the field, etc etc etc. I mean, we've already had 39 unsportsmanlike penalties and our DE is trying to smack the ball out of Lawrence's hands while he's laying on the ground. Just dumb immature ****.
Don't forget, this is the same staff that threw a champagne party in the locker room after winning a close game to Western Michigan (or whoever it was) and allowed dancing on the sidelines during losses to GT and FIU.
No way around it, we are a corny bunch. We've come a long way since the days of "I AIN'T SCARED OF YOU *****" during the coin toss.
Maybe there needs to be less gimmicks and more substance going forward, cause right now we're that bully that likes to flex on inferior dudes but folds when the big dawg walks into the room. And that causes outsiders to thoroughly enjoy our losses.
WE SIMPLY DON'T LOOK LIKE A TEAM WITH A LOT OF CONTROL AT THE TOP. Just my opinion.




To sum it up, I think there's a talent difference between the rosters AND coaching staffs and tonight's blow-out loss is evidence of that.
A loss like this can't be blamed on just one thing.
Coaching is Trash....coupled with Some soft *** players.....bout sums it up....Complete undisciplined team
 
Let's watch some film...


0:18 - Frierson is too busy starring at the QB to cover the WR who's running an out-route right in front of his face. Goes back to why I hate the way we play zone. We're not a "match" concept, we stand in spots and stare at the QB. If Frierson "mans" this WR up as soon as he enters his zone, this isn't an easy pitch and catch. Lawrence could've throw to the slot up top too. Why are we playing zone on 3rd & 3 anyway?

0:30 - Easy RPO pitch-and-catch here. Lawrence is reading Frierson. If Fri comes down on the run, Lawrence pulls and throws.

0:41 - This is what happens when you play that pussified "catch man" **** that Manny/Baker employ. When you play a true hands-on press, the CB can disrupt screens like this. But watch Blades. He's backing up on the snap. Combine that with the fact that we have our Safety playing way off, it's easy pitch-and-catch again. And I don't know what Bolden is looking at/doing. He's not even reacting at all, just sitting there watching the play unfold. The old "keep everything in front of you" game plan.

1:08 - Really clever throwback screen by Clemson here. Imagination on offense. Refreshing.

1:39 - Clemson employs basically a 3-4 Under front here. Their LB slices inside of our TE and completely blows the play up. TE doesn't block a soul.

2:00 - 3rd & long. Clemson blitzes and basically plays Cover-0 and drops two DL into underneath zones. Miami's WR's run "sticks" routes versus off coverage and it's a nice conversion.

2:30 - 3rd & 10 and Clemson is playing Cover-1-Man and sending the house. King has to know this ball needs to come out quick. Just because you need 10 yards doesn't mean the ball has to be THROWN 10 yards. He should look to the shorter routes in this scenario, maybe he should've tried Jordan on the out (whip route).

3:04 - We're in man coverage but I don't know who's covering Etienne. McCloud maybe? They run a delayed RB screen and McCloud gets caught up with the O-linemen. I mean, that's just Clemson's OC scheming up nice ****. We didn't see any of this from Lashlee.

3:17 - Simply bad gap integrity by Phillips here, being a bit selfish. Once he peaks inside to make a play that probably isn't his responsibility, he gives up outside contain.

3:28 - This is what happens when you insist on staying in 2-high coverage versus an H-back formation and a running QB. You get out-manned on the weak side. I don't know where McCloud is going, but it wouldn't have mattered anyway because the pulling Guard probably would've blocked him regardless. Manny/Baker need to roll that weak Safety down into the box versus a formation like this. OC's love putting the H-back strong and running to the weak side. We're absolutely clueless to this, as if it isn't a staple of most spread offenses right now. I freakin' saw this SAME PLAY in my high school opponents like 4 times last season. Columbus runs the **** out of it. IF YOU DON'T ROLL THAT WEAK SAFETY DOWN IN THE BOX IT'S EASY PICKENS. Why the **** is our weak Safety so deep anyway? WTF is he protecting us from versus this particular formation?!

3:47 - Careless, selfish, just plain fvckin' stupid. You get great defensive coverage and a chance to get off the field, and you dive into a sliding QB. Absolutely ridiculous, inexcusable play. As his coach I would be fvckin' livid. Instead I'm sure Baker and Co patted him on the butt while Jalar Holley danced to cheer him up.

4:10 - Clemson runs double screens. Common spread concept. Lawrence has a choice of which one to throw. This is how bad we are on defense. Lawrence makes the wrong decision because the flare/bubble screen is there. But we're so out of position that he has time to COME BACK TO IT and it's STILL WIDE OPEN! Now here lies the problem. I want you to watch Jennings and Davis. Jennings is reacting strictly to the QB instead of the initial receiving threat to his side. He should be reacting to the screen that is taking place ON HIS SIDE OF THE FIELD rather than letting Lawrence toy with him. GO RUN OUT THERE AND CHASE THE BUBBLE! Let the defenders on the left side of the defense worry about THAT screen. Watch Davis as well. He's reacting to the QB instead of diagnosing what's in front of him and reacting. You see a bubble screen in front of you, get off the block and go get it. Don't freakin' wait for the ball to be throw, by then it's too late. Bolden is nowhere to be found on the screen as well. This defense is just way too passive and reactionary. Just badddd bad coaching and overall coverage principles. This play is really embarrassing when you think about it. Love the part where Bolden gets ran over and talks ****. SMH

4:33 - Clemson's OC utilized creativity and he has answers. We're in man coverage on 3rd & long. Brooks has Etienne man-to-man before the snap, but since Etienne crosses the formation it now means Jennings has him. Jennings gets caught up with the Lineman and fails to force Etienne back inside. Off to the races. Clemson's OC clearly understands that you don't have to THROW THE BALL 10+ YARDS to gain 10+ yards.

5:44 - Man coverage by Clemson and every route we're running has a vertical release. Who's supposed to be open here?

6:09 - 3 & 19 makes things tough. Look at the routes here. Everything vertical release and outside the hashes. Nothing threatening the middle of the field.

6:53 - WTF are we doing here? LOL. It's 3rd & 16! Why are we even in Cover-2? The vertical at the top of the screen was open too!

7:06 - Look at the loose coverage Jordan is getting at the top of the screen. If I'm King that's the first place I'm looking when all I need is 6 yards. Even with that said, the crossing route probably could've got us the first down too. But in a situation like this, against a defense that hasn't given you much time to sit in the pocket, take the quicker route. (which is Jordan)

7:34 - 3 & 8. We're blitzing and playing man coverage. Nothing wrong with that call, Blades just gets toasted by one of the many elite South FLA WR's that left home. Which brings me to a point - Ladson is another one of the kids that people on this site said "wasn't that good anyway" when he chose to go OOS. Can we finally stop with this ****? Ladson, Stevenson, Surtain, Campbell, Tutu, Elijah Moore, etc. Every time a kid chooses an OOS school the sour grapes crews always respond with "well he's overrated anyway", then the kid goes to college and balls out. NEWS FLASH: These schools are way fvckin' better than us at evaluating, recruiting and developing talent. They don't come down here and sign "overrated" kids. The Georgia/Clemson/OSU/Bama staffs deserve the benefit of the doubt way before our staff does in regards to finding talent.

8:11 - 3rd & 9 and we give up a 15 yard out-route. This is the same exact coverage we were in when we gave up the 4th & 17 to North Carolina. The deep-out to the slot WR is always open in this coverage. Smith can't cover that route with inside leverage. He's there to protect against the slant or any in-breaking route. I just assume Miami is willing to give up the deep out because it's a hard throw.

8:46 - 3rd & 8. Clemson blitzes and plays man coverage. All routes are vertical and outside the hashes. SMH

9:17 - 3rd & 13. Clemson runs a blitz that looks like it's from Manny's playbook. Again, every route is vertical. Wiggins has no ability to adjust to the ball. He could've made a play here but he's not savvy.

9:44 - Clemson runs a fake toss/pop pass. Very nice design and pretty much impossible to defend, especially when you consider that the WR/TE pretended to block. But look how much creativity we've already seen from Clemson's OC during this first half. We saw nothing like this from Lashlee tonight. WTF happened to the Lashlee we saw in the Louisville game?

10:12 - Look at the gap that is created here after our DT's stunt/slant to the left. The Center and playside Guard don't have anyone to block anymore so they just move up to our LB's. The play before this we played straight-up and stuffed them, but we just HAD to get antsy and call some cute ****.


This is getting exhausting and depressing. Perhaps I'll finish the second half later.


Another excellent breakdown coach. What we are seeing from Baker is just flat out incompetence. He needs to be shown the door after this season.
 
Advertisement
It’s going to take a little more time to get to that point. Period. This was a litmus test and we failed.

It’s all about rebounding from here and building confidence.

The penalties drove me crazy. But I didn’t mind the trash talking (minus the stupid ball swipe) because it keep the guys on D playing hard. They didn’t quit. At that point whatever it takes to get you to keep fighting.

But the penalties are just silly silly stuff.
 
The talent disparity isn’t that large.

We have a mediocre head coach who can’t for the life of him help his mediocre DC put the best players in the game. The defense gave up EIGHT different 3-9 plus plays. 3&18. 3&14. 3&anything long. That’s awful. And most of that simply had to do with force feeding 44 & 53 even though they aren’t Miami caliber LBs.

Put the right personnel on the field and we are a much better defensive football team. Coaching decisions matter.

You can’t have three mediocre LB coaches on a staff, who are ***** evaluators and developers, who don’t even know who to start, coaching a “no gap” defense. Recipe for mediocrity. Clemson basically targeted our LBs most of the night and scored on the same type of TE plays that UL, FSU, and VT did.

If you combine our inability to get off the field on third down on defense, with our inability to convert on third down on offense, you get last nights results. We were terrible on both sides of the ball.

Lashlee went into a shell. He has to adjust his first down play-calling. After Brent got downhill early, he attempted some sideline throws to get the ball out quick, but our WRs weren’t up for the blocking or receiving challenge. Later we missed on the Mallory deep throw (had the matchup) and turned it over. And Wiggins dropped deep balls and allowed 1 to be intercepted. Lashlee was having a hard time calling plays because his WR Corp was scared out of its mind and playing soft AF.

No heart from the starters. None. All three are soft and need to sit. Hard to call plays when your starting WRs at Miami are ****tier than the ones you had at SMU. King had more competitive athletes at Houston as starters. Gotta sit them down. That’s on Lashlee and Likens, IMO. Pope, Wiggins, and Harley have shown all year that they are mentally soft.

Bubba Bolden basically tells us all we need to know about our defensive recruiting and where we stand even in regards to evaluating competitive spirit. He totally out classes our Florida defenders. This is why I’ve always said I don’t care where you find a Baller just find that Baller develop him, and put him in a position to succeed!

We wanted to see where we measured out. It’s telling that we don’t have the right kids starting at several positions and the staff doesn’t have the ability to develop even our highly recruited four stars. We’re still waiting for Hall to make a play.
 
We could have traded Cam for Etienne last night and the watched the best RB in CFB run into the middle of the line for no gain. Lashlee had better figure that sht out right quick.
 
We've still got a ways to go, fellas. Completely out-classed on all levels tonight. Embarrassed on the big stage once again, after a bye week, after "earning" a top-10 ranking.





*Lashlee
RUNNING GAME - I don't know WTF I watched tonight. It's like he went back to his UAB playbook. We saw ONE running play tonight, Inside Zone. Clemson employed an "Odd Tite" front during most running downs, which has the DE's line-up just inside the Offensive Tackles, making it almost impossible to run Inside Zone. There was very little effort from Lashlee to employ different running concepts. (maybe some Outside Zone, Counter or Speed Option?)WR

PASSNIG GAME - Hardly saw any Air Raid concepts tonight, everything was vertical and outside, which as I eluded to all week, are the lower percentage throws. Where were the crossing routes? Hitches? Slants? Venerables just left his CB's one-on-one with our WR's and dared us to throw deep. And we did. Over and over and over again with zero success. By the way, our WR corps is the product of poor recruiting and evaluations. We might have the worst WR talent I've seen at Miami in all my years of watching Cane's football. Even during the previous regime, we at least had ONE guy who could take the top off of a defense. (i.e. Phillip Dorsett or Travis Benjamin) We don't have anybody out there right now that scares opposing DC's, which is probably why any defense that plays press-man coverage versus us has success, even the FIU's and Dukes of the world. A guy like Tutu would've been nice to have tonight.


*Baker
I actually thought Baker called a decent game for the most part. He kept things pretty simple, we didn't see too much gimmicky stuff, did a good job spying Lawrence at times. There were still some fundamental/alignment issues that led to big plays. On Etienne's long TD run, we had no "overhang" player to the weak side. We were short-numbered. Of course Clemson was gonna pull Guards and run that way! People were giving McCloud **** for that play, but that was too much to ask of him. At the end of the day we still need better players. It's no coincidence that our only players on defense who flash are the 4/5 star guys. We're gonna need more of those because I don't know how well our staff can actually DEVELOP lower ranked guys.
It also doesn't help that we shot ourselves in the foot plenty times via timely penalties. Carter is a fvckin' crash dummy.

*Recruiting
I know a lot of yall love the underdog 3-star "developmental" types but for the most part the only players that looked like they belonged on the same field as Clemson were our 4/5 star guys. Sorry, it is what it is. That doesn't mean 3-star kids can't be good and help your team, cause lord knows I've lobbied for a few local ones, but WE HAVEN'T RECRUITED THE RIGHT ONES AT ALL. I thought the game plans on both offense and defense were very simple tonight. When the game plans are simple, you're relying on talent. And when it doesn't work, it's a lot easier to notice the talent deficiencies. Watching our outside WR's fail over and over again to exploit man coverage makes it very easy to see. There's no scheme involved there, it's just talent versus talent. I mean, they couldn't even adjust to the football while it was in the air and the CB's backs were turned. None of our upperclassmen WR's will even see an NFL try-out IMO. Then watching Blades get beat on slants, drop a pick-6 and give up a man-to-man deep ball on 3rd & long makes us realize that it would be nice to have at least ONE of those elite local CB's that we've missed on over the last few years.

*Culture
Poorly coached teams with questionable culture always act like we do during adversity and/or losses. Trash talking while you're getting blown out, tons of unnecessary unsportsmanlike penalties, bone-headed plays during money downs that prevent your defense from getting off the field, etc etc etc. I mean, we've already had 39 unsportsmanlike penalties and our DE is trying to smack the ball out of Lawrence's hands while he's laying on the ground. Just dumb immature ****.
Don't forget, this is the same staff that threw a champagne party in the locker room after winning a close game to Western Michigan (or whoever it was) and allowed dancing on the sidelines during losses to GT and FIU.
No way around it, we are a corny bunch. We've come a long way since the days of "I AIN'T SCARED OF YOU *****" during the coin toss.
Maybe there needs to be less gimmicks and more substance going forward, cause right now we're that bully that likes to flex on inferior dudes but folds when the big dawg walks into the room. And that causes outsiders to thoroughly enjoy our losses.
WE SIMPLY DON'T LOOK LIKE A TEAM WITH A LOT OF CONTROL AT THE TOP. Just my opinion.




To sum it up, I think there's a talent difference between the rosters AND coaching staffs and tonight's blow-out loss is evidence of that.
A loss like this can't be blamed on just one thing.

We've still got a ways to go, fellas. Completely out-classed on all levels tonight. Embarrassed on the big stage once again, after a bye week, after "earning" a top-10 ranking.





*Lashlee
RUNNING GAME - I don't know WTF I watched tonight. It's like he went back to his UAB playbook. We saw ONE running play tonight, Inside Zone. Clemson employed an "Odd Tite" front during most running downs, which has the DE's line-up just inside the Offensive Tackles, making it almost impossible to run Inside Zone. There was very little effort from Lashlee to employ different running concepts. (maybe some Outside Zone, Counter or Speed Option?)WR

PASSNIG GAME - Hardly saw any Air Raid concepts tonight, everything was vertical and outside, which as I eluded to all week, are the lower percentage throws. Where were the crossing routes? Hitches? Slants? Venerables just left his CB's one-on-one with our WR's and dared us to throw deep. And we did. Over and over and over again with zero success. By the way, our WR corps is the product of poor recruiting and evaluations. We might have the worst WR talent I've seen at Miami in all my years of watching Cane's football. Even during the previous regime, we at least had ONE guy who could take the top off of a defense. (i.e. Phillip Dorsett or Travis Benjamin) We don't have anybody out there right now that scares opposing DC's, which is probably why any defense that plays press-man coverage versus us has success, even the FIU's and Dukes of the world. A guy like Tutu would've been nice to have tonight.


*Baker
I actually thought Baker called a decent game for the most part. He kept things pretty simple, we didn't see too much gimmicky stuff, did a good job spying Lawrence at times. There were still some fundamental/alignment issues that led to big plays. On Etienne's long TD run, we had no "overhang" player to the weak side. We were short-numbered. Of course Clemson was gonna pull Guards and run that way! People were giving McCloud **** for that play, but that was too much to ask of him. At the end of the day we still need better players. It's no coincidence that our only players on defense who flash are the 4/5 star guys. We're gonna need more of those because I don't know how well our staff can actually DEVELOP lower ranked guys.
It also doesn't help that we shot ourselves in the foot plenty times via timely penalties. Carter is a fvckin' crash dummy.

*Recruiting
I know a lot of yall love the underdog 3-star "developmental" types but for the most part the only players that looked like they belonged on the same field as Clemson were our 4/5 star guys. Sorry, it is what it is. That doesn't mean 3-star kids can't be good and help your team, cause lord knows I've lobbied for a few local ones, but WE HAVEN'T RECRUITED THE RIGHT ONES AT ALL. I thought the game plans on both offense and defense were very simple tonight. When the game plans are simple, you're relying on talent. And when it doesn't work, it's a lot easier to notice the talent deficiencies. Watching our outside WR's fail over and over again to exploit man coverage makes it very easy to see. There's no scheme involved there, it's just talent versus talent. I mean, they couldn't even adjust to the football while it was in the air and the CB's backs were turned. None of our upperclassmen WR's will even see an NFL try-out IMO. Then watching Blades get beat on slants, drop a pick-6 and give up a man-to-man deep ball on 3rd & long makes us realize that it would be nice to have at least ONE of those elite local CB's that we've missed on over the last few years.

*Culture
Poorly coached teams with questionable culture always act like we do during adversity and/or losses. Trash talking while you're getting blown out, tons of unnecessary unsportsmanlike penalties, bone-headed plays during money downs that prevent your defense from getting off the field, etc etc etc. I mean, we've already had 39 unsportsmanlike penalties and our DE is trying to smack the ball out of Lawrence's hands while he's laying on the ground. Just dumb immature ****.
Don't forget, this is the same staff that threw a champagne party in the locker room after winning a close game to Western Michigan (or whoever it was) and allowed dancing on the sidelines during losses to GT and FIU.
No way around it, we are a corny bunch. We've come a long way since the days of "I AIN'T SCARED OF YOU *****" during the coin toss.
Maybe there needs to be less gimmicks and more substance going forward, cause right now we're that bully that likes to flex on inferior dudes but folds when the big dawg walks into the room. And that causes outsiders to thoroughly enjoy our losses.
WE SIMPLY DON'T LOOK LIKE A TEAM WITH A LOT OF CONTROL AT THE TOP. Just my opinion.




To sum it up, I think there's a talent difference between the rosters AND coaching staffs and tonight's blow-out loss is evidence of that.
A loss like this can't be blamed on just one thing.
We've still got a ways to go, fellas. Completely out-classed on all levels tonight. Embarrassed on the big stage once again, after a bye week, after "earning" a top-10 ranking.




*Lashlee
RUNNING GAME - I don't know WTF I watched tonight. It's like he went back to his UAB playbook. We saw ONE running play tonight, Inside Zone. Clemson employed an "Odd Tite" front during most running downs, which has the DE's line-up just inside the Offensive Tackles, making it almost impossible to run Inside Zone. There was very little effort from Lashlee to employ different running concepts. (maybe some Outside Zone, Counter or Speed Option?)WR

PASSNIG GAME - Hardly saw any Air Raid concepts tonight, everything was vertical and outside, which as I eluded to all week, are the lower percentage throws. Where were the crossing routes? Hitches? Slants? Venerables just left his CB's one-on-one with our WR's and dared us to throw deep. And we did. Over and over and over again with zero success. By the way, our WR corps is the product of poor recruiting and evaluations. We might have the worst WR talent I've seen at Miami in all my years of watching Cane's football. Even during the previous regime, we at least had ONE guy who could take the top off of a defense. (i.e. Phillip Dorsett or Travis Benjamin) We don't have anybody out there right now that scares opposing DC's, which is probably why any defense that plays press-man coverage versus us has success, even the FIU's and Dukes of the world. A guy like Tutu would've been nice to have tonight.


*Baker
I actually thought Baker called a decent game for the most part. He kept things pretty simple, we didn't see too much gimmicky stuff, did a good job spying Lawrence at times. There were still some fundamental/alignment issues that led to big plays. On Etienne's long TD run, we had no "overhang" player to the weak side. We were short-numbered. Of course Clemson was gonna pull Guards and run that way! People were giving McCloud **** for that play, but that was too much to ask of him. At the end of the day we still need better players. It's no coincidence that our only players on defense who flash are the 4/5 star guys. We're gonna need more of those because I don't know how well our staff can actually DEVELOP lower ranked guys.
It also doesn't help that we shot ourselves in the foot plenty times via timely penalties. Carter is a fvckin' crash dummy.

*Recruiting
I know a lot of yall love the underdog 3-star "developmental" types but for the most part the only players that looked like they belonged on the same field as Clemson were our 4/5 star guys. Sorry, it is what it is. That doesn't mean 3-star kids can't be good and help your team, cause lord knows I've lobbied for a few local ones, but WE HAVEN'T RECRUITED THE RIGHT ONES AT ALL. I thought the game plans on both offense and defense were very simple tonight. When the game plans are simple, you're relying on talent. And when it doesn't work, it's a lot easier to notice the talent deficiencies. Watching our outside WR's fail over and over again to exploit man coverage makes it very easy to see. There's no scheme involved there, it's just talent versus talent. I mean, they couldn't even adjust to the football while it was in the air and the CB's backs were turned. None of our upperclassmen WR's will even see an NFL try-out IMO. Then watching Blades get beat on slants, drop a pick-6 and give up a man-to-man deep ball on 3rd & long makes us realize that it would be nice to have at least ONE of those elite local CB's that we've missed on over the last few years.

*Culture
Poorly coached teams with questionable culture always act like we do during adversity and/or losses. Trash talking while you're getting blown out, tons of unnecessary unsportsmanlike penalties, bone-headed plays during money downs that prevent your defense from getting off the field, etc etc etc. I mean, we've already had 39 unsportsmanlike penalties and our DE is trying to smack the ball out of Lawrence's hands while he's laying on the ground. Just dumb immature ****.
Don't forget, this is the same staff that threw a champagne party in the locker room after winning a close game to Western Michigan (or whoever it was) and allowed dancing on the sidelines during losses to GT and FIU.
No way around it, we are a corny bunch. We've come a long way since the days of "I AIN'T SCARED OF YOU *****" during the coin toss.
Maybe there needs to be less gimmicks and more substance going forward, cause right now we're that bully that likes to flex on inferior dudes but folds when the big dawg walks into the room. And that causes outsiders to thoroughly enjoy our losses.
WE SIMPLY DON'T LOOK LIKE A TEAM WITH A LOT OF CONTROL AT THE TOP. Just my opinion.




To sum it up, I think there's a talent difference between the rosters AND coaching staffs and tonight's blow-out loss is evidence of that.
A loss like this can't be blamed on just one thing.

Excellent accessment as always. We are vastly better program than last year but still have a long way too go. It's obvious that some young players need more burn. Redding will actually compete for jump balls needs some looks in the redzone. We have speed to burn but no one plays physical on the endge clemson bullied us. We are playing 3 slot receivers currently. Harrison Hunter is a monster and deserves more playing time. Also need to see some fire from Manny. Mixing it up with the refs but more importantly more intensity toward the players on the sideline. All in all moving in the right direction. Our fan base has to stop falling for the hype year after year and recognize it's a process but we will be right back here next year when we face Bama.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top