- Joined
- Oct 13, 2011
- Messages
- 22,159
Also, your chart dates to 2002 drafts, so it’s pretty obvious it is weighting the Butch era guys. We all know the last decade has been different.
The last Butch draft was 2004, over fifteen years ago.
Also, your chart dates to 2002 drafts, so it’s pretty obvious it is weighting the Butch era guys. We all know the last decade has been different.
The last butch draft was ‘05, but we’re splitting hairs. (Chris Myers was an ‘05 draft class kid.) The point is those classes (and the next couple) gave the league the talent that supports the chart you linked to. The past decade has not been so kind to us. It’s pretty clear when you look at it.The last Butch draft was 2004, over fifteen years ago.
They’ve had a few, but still low when you consider how good they’ve been especially when compared to OSU, Bama during the same time frame.Volume wise, yes, but they've produced some elite NFL players. Something we haven't done for a long while.
He can't say yo we suck......maybe that's what got him the job and I love Reed and love the hire. Why didn't the Zo deal go through? Maybe he would of kept it a buck. Who knows man. Our talent isn't as great since Butch left and it's fact....just watch Sundays man.Ed Reed said it at his press conference..... nine kids aren't going to win games for you by themselves - it's the kids in the middle who win and lose games for you.
Miami will always have a few kids that go to the NFL. Most kids at Miami don't. And it's the non-NFL kids that decide if you win or lose games.
At a place like Wisconsin, the kids who aren't going to the NFL are tough and they play hard. They love football and pride themselves in it.
At a place like Miami, the kids who aren't going to the NFL - they're soft and they roll over as soon as adversity hits.
Since 2010, there have been 69 Miami Hurricanes that were invited to the NFL Combine and/or drafted by the NFL (66 combine invitees, 3 drafted non-combine invitees).
I've defined the following
Starter - You don't need a definition here, a consistent starter in the league.
Role-Player - Perhaps has started a game here or there, or even for long stretches, but has settled into the league as a rostered role player.
Backup/Practice Squad - deep bench guy. Maybe he plays, probably from an injury.
Out of the League - Basically played through one contract or less.
So...69 players.
Starters - 13 (18%)
Role-Players - 14 (20%)
Current Backup/PS - 16 (24%)
Out of the League - 26 (38%)
In the past decade...
Round 1 - 4 (6%)
Round 2 / 3 (aka Day 2) - 13 (19%)
Round 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 (aka Day 3) - 35 (51%)
Un-drafted - 17 (24%)
I'll let the reader figure out if that is good or not.
If you add 2020 to the mix...add another 8 projected Day 3 or undrafted players to the list
ExactlyOK. Now do the rest of the nation. Posts like this are meaningless unless you compare us to everyone else.
It's hard to make it to the NFL. That's why only two programs in the world have more current NFL players than Miami.
OK. Now do the rest of the nation. Posts like this are meaningless unless you compare us to everyone else.
It's hard to make it to the NFL. That's why only two programs in the world have more current NFL players than Miami.
If you want to evaluate talent based on the NFL then you have to base it on their performance in the league. Using the NFL draft as a whole is just lazy because it rewards bad draft picks.
I'd hypothesize that most schools can bat 75% on their draft eligible (combine/drafted players) players Day 3 or undrafted over a decade or 62% of their combine/draftees as Backups or Out of the League in a few years or bounce around the league for a minute.
That's why I used total salary, and not draft picks. It accounts for the second contract.
Didn’t have any in the first 5 drafts of that decade. Had 4 in the last 5 drafts though. Guarantee Miami is top 10 in first round draft picks since 2015 and top 5 in total draft picks or close to it since 2015. Rememeber Miami wasn’t producing that much talent outside of a few names or draft picks in 2010-2014 or soNFL 1st round draft picks since 2010:
SEC
-Alabama 28
-Florida 13
-LSU 10
-Georgia 9
ACC
-Clemson 11
-Florida State 11
-Lousville 8
-North Carolina 6
-Viriginia Tech 4
-Miami 4
-Boston College 3
Your data is weighed heavily by guys that have been in the league for 10 years.
Then why are other schools producing less NFL players, under your hypothesis?