Yearby?

Advertisement
What was the real story with Yearby? Some dudes on here said he was a cancer.

He's a very quiet guy but a hard worker. I never had a problem with him and wasn't aware if any other teammates did. I don't know why his carries went down or if he and any coaches had spats but he always came ready for practice.

.

The coaches just had it out for him and didn't want to play the most talented guy right Oblivion?

Did Yearby out perform Walton in the 1st 4 games of ACC play before being banished?
 
Doesn't matter because Homer coming for that rock. He'll be better than both before it's all said and done. If you think Walton hits the hole fast you're going to think Homer was shot out of a cannon.
 
What was the real story with Yearby? Some dudes on here said he was a cancer.

He's a very quiet guy but a hard worker. I never had a problem with him and wasn't aware if any other teammates did. I don't know why his carries went down or if he and any coaches had spats but he always came ready for practice.

.

The coaches just had it out for him and didn't want to play the most talented guy right Oblivion?

Did Yearby out perform Walton in the 1st 4 games of ACC play before being banished?

It's odd that you judge the whole position based on four games but playing your game no. Even though Yearby had a SLIGHTLY better YPC that doesn't show the whole story. One good run can get that for you. How about that Walton had Four times the receiving yards?
 
He's a very quiet guy but a hard worker. I never had a problem with him and wasn't aware if any other teammates did. I don't know why his carries went down or if he and any coaches had spats but he always came ready for practice.

.

The coaches just had it out for him and didn't want to play the most talented guy right Oblivion?

Did Yearby out perform Walton in the 1st 4 games of ACC play before being banished?

It's odd that you judge the whole position based on four games but playing your game no. Even though Yearby had a SLIGHTLY better YPC that doesn't show the whole story. One good run can get that for you. How about that Walton had Four times the receiving yards?
How many receptions tho. You can say what you want about Yearby but he can catch. He had multiple one hand catches out the backfield and up the seem. Ive never seen a pass to him that was dropped

Sent from my LGLS775 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Advertisement

The coaches just had it out for him and didn't want to play the most talented guy right Oblivion?

Did Yearby out perform Walton in the 1st 4 games of ACC play before being banished?

It's odd that you judge the whole position based on four games but playing your game no. Even though Yearby had a SLIGHTLY better YPC that doesn't show the whole story. One good run can get that for you. How about that Walton had Four times the receiving yards?
How many receptions tho. You can say ehat you want about Yearby but he can catch. He jad multiple one hand catches out the backfield and up the seem. Ive never seen a pass to him that was dropped

Sent from my LGLS775 using Tapatalk

Dude is reaching. Walton was targeted 37 times compared to Yearby 14. Yearby wasn't even going to compete in the passing game when the last pass he caught was against ND.

He doesn't want to look at the four game span when Walton and Yearby were a 1, 2 punch. I am setting him up because i am not using the cupcakes or the games when Yearby was just tossed in a few plays here or there for Walton.

Just forget Walton play during October. He just didn't catch the breaks Yearby did with that one play on limited carries. Yearby stole his big plays and that's why he avg 3.1.

Yearby isn't Cook. He won't be an NFL starter. He lacks the physical talent to be elite, but he does have the instinct.
 
I always thought Yearby went down waaay to easy.Many times he got tackled by the grass gnomes....there's a reason why he's looking for a job and it has nothing to do with CMR not playing him in favor of Walton and more about the fact that he just wasn't as good as we all had hoped.

Wished from the beginning we'd have gotten the other Cental back..
 
You need to get your eyes checked if you think Yeaby is anywhere near as good as Walton.

Walton is way more explosive, faster and runs hard as ****. There's a lot of plays Walton made last year that Yearby could never make.

Seems there was plenty of runs Yearby could make vs GT, UNC and VT that Walton couldn't. Yearby had less than half the carries vs UNC Walton had and had 8 yards less and 4 yds per carry more. Matter of fact, from Gt to VT before Yearby got gutted from the field he was out doing Walton in every game.

Walton 64 car 203 yds 3.1 avg

Yearby 38 car 237 yds 6.2 avg

Back-up RB's have higher YPC than the starter all the time. Less carries usually leads to higher YPC, especially considering the fact that the 2nd string guy plays later in the game with fresh legs.

Not the first time we've seen this.

You think Yearby is better than Walton?

You're kidding right? Joe played later in games with fresh legs?

Yearby yards vs GT came in the 1st 20 mins of the game. 6 car 63 yds 1st 20 mins of game. Doesn't touch the ball again until 5 mins left in the 3rd.

He and Walton swapped for the most part so it wasn't like Yearby came in during garbage time. We weren't beating the breaks off anyone. In fact we lost 3 of the 4 games. So how was Yearby looking better late in games after what, Walton wore them down with his 3.1 ypc?

Yearby out performed Walton before he was axed and out performed him the previous season as well.

Yearby has the instinct to play the position, sadly he doesn't have the speed needed to make a future out of it.

If you could combine the 2 backs you would have an awesome player carrying the rock.



Out performed him the previous season?

How about instead of using subjective stats you go and compare their production with a full work load.

Walton's Sophomore year was better than Yearby's by far better.

Obviously you're good at digging up stats. Go look.
 
You need to get your eyes checked if you think Yeaby is anywhere near as good as Walton.

Walton is way more explosive, faster and runs hard as ****. There's a lot of plays Walton made last year that Yearby could never make.

Seems there was plenty of runs Yearby could make vs GT, UNC and VT that Walton couldn't. Yearby had less than half the carries vs UNC Walton had and had 8 yards less and 4 yds per carry more. Matter of fact, from Gt to VT before Yearby got gutted from the field he was out doing Walton in every game.

Walton 64 car 203 yds 3.1 avg

Yearby 38 car 237 yds 6.2 avg

Back-up RB's have higher YPC than the starter all the time. Less carries usually leads to higher YPC, especially considering the fact that the 2nd string guy plays later in the game with fresh legs.

Not the first time we've seen this.

You think Yearby is better than Walton?

You're kidding right? Joe played later in games with fresh legs?

Yearby yards vs GT came in the 1st 20 mins of the game. 6 car 63 yds 1st 20 mins of game. Doesn't touch the ball again until 5 mins left in the 3rd.

He and Walton swapped for the most part so it wasn't like Yearby came in during garbage time. We weren't beating the breaks off anyone. In fact we lost 3 of the 4 games. So how was Yearby looking better late in games after what, Walton wore them down with his 3.1 ypc?

Yearby out performed Walton before he was axed and out performed him the previous season as well.

Yearby has the instinct to play the position, sadly he doesn't have the speed needed to make a future out of it.

If you could combine the 2 backs you would have an awesome player carrying the rock.

I 100% agree with this.. Yearby has a natural feel for the game something you can't coach or measure with numbers.

Yet somehow the guys who have coached multiple NFL RB's had him sitting 3rd string behind Walton and a kid from New York City.
 
Advertisement
It's one thing to think that you know more than fellow posters on a message board...

But to think that you know more about a kid's ability than 32 NFL GM's and a college head coach who's had multiple stud RB's? LOL



I think you guys are onto something. It must be a huge anti-Yearby conspiracy.
 
It's one thing to think that you know more than fellow posters on a message board...

But to think that you know more about a kid's ability than 32 NFL GM's and a college head coach who's had multiple stud RB's? LOL



I think you guys are onto something. It must be a huge anti-Yearby conspiracy.

Who is stating Yearby is a stud? Nobody is saying Yearby is an NFL back. Plenty of guys are productive in college and don't end up on NFL rosters.

Thomas Brown coached a guy at Wisconsin that was putting up numbers before Brown was even there, just like every other Wisconsin RB has done. He coached Chubb and Sony, big deal. Them dudes were studs in HS and it wasn't like he made them the backs they are toting the rock. You can teach pass pro but you aren't teaching instinct. A RB either has it or he doesn't. You don't coach subpar guys into being elite. They can put up big numbers, but they are who they are.
 
I like Yearby and wish him the best but dude is a 4.7-4.8 running back that doesn't way 230lbs. It's going to be very difficult for him to make a long career in the league. Again hope I'm wrong but just don't see it.
 
Advertisement
It's one thing to think that you know more than fellow posters on a message board...

But to think that you know more about a kid's ability than 32 NFL GM's and a college head coach who's had multiple stud RB's? LOL



I think you guys are onto something. It must be a huge anti-Yearby conspiracy.

Who is stating Yearby is a stud? Nobody is saying Yearby is an NFL back. Plenty of guys are productive in college and don't end up on NFL rosters.

Thomas Brown coached a guy at Wisconsin that was putting up numbers before Brown was even there, just like every other Wisconsin RB has done. He coached Chubb and Sony, big deal. Them dudes were studs in HS and it wasn't like he made them the backs they are toting the rock. You can teach pass pro but you aren't teaching instinct. A RB either has it or he doesn't. You don't coach subpar guys into being elite. They can put up big numbers, but they are who they are.

i think hes talking about coach MR and macho is right Yearby is not a good rb period even though he was a cane the truth is the truth.
 
I like Yearby and wish him the best but dude is a 4.7-4.8 running back that doesn't way 230lbs. It's going to be very difficult for him to make a long career in the league. Again hope I'm wrong but just don't see it.

I think Yearby is hoping to just make a practice squad. $6900 a week minimum salary. $117k if he stays on there for a season. That's good money for someone in their early 20s with a couple kids. Solid start.
 
It's one thing to think that you know more than fellow posters on a message board...

But to think that you know more about a kid's ability than 32 NFL GM's and a college head coach who's had multiple stud RB's? LOL



I think you guys are onto something. It must be a huge anti-Yearby conspiracy.

Who is stating Yearby is a stud? Nobody is saying Yearby is an NFL back. Plenty of guys are productive in college and don't end up on NFL rosters.

Thomas Brown coached a guy at Wisconsin that was putting up numbers before Brown was even there, just like every other Wisconsin RB has done. He coached Chubb and Sony, big deal. Them dudes were studs in HS and it wasn't like he made them the backs they are toting the rock. You can teach pass pro but you aren't teaching instinct. A RB either has it or he doesn't. You don't coach subpar guys into being elite. They can put up big numbers, but they are who they are.

i think hes talking about coach MR and macho is right Yearby is not a good rb period even though he was a cane the truth is the truth.

Yearby was a good college RB period.
 
Advertisement
I like Yearby and wish him the best but dude is a 4.7-4.8 running back that doesn't way 230lbs. It's going to be very difficult for him to make a long career in the league. Again hope I'm wrong but just don't see it.

I think Yearby is hoping to just make a practice squad. $6900 a week minimum salary. $117k if he stays on there for a season. That's good money for someone in their early 20s with a couple kids. Solid start.

Everyone understands that making a roster (active, inactive, practice) is great money.

The debate/discussion most of us are engaging in is how likely he will be to make a roster in any capacity.

And my point, throughout the Yearby discussion, is that he should have came back to Miami to help the team and to help himself.

As is pointed out in the linked article, Yearby didn't really have much special teams film. And that's what he'll need to make a roster, IMO.

Can he block? Can he tackle? Can he maintain his lane? Can he pursue? Can he be a good teammate?

He could have checked all those boxes with another year at Miami.

But if he thinks he's making a roster as a feature back, change of pace back, or 3rd-down specialist, I think he's fooling himself.

And if his goal is taking care of the family, getting more film to make a roster is in his best interest.

Seems like the kid made an ego decision, and it will likely cost him.

Unless, the Lions come calling ...
 
And can we please stop with this "Edwards was the 2nd string back" $h!t. By a wiiiiiide margin, Joe had more carries than Edwards 102-59...more yards than Edwards 608-290...more YPC than Edwards 5.96-4.92...more TDs than Edwards 7-1...& more catches than Edwards 10-1. Those stats don't even remotely suggest that "Edwards was the 2nd string back", people just makin' $h!t up again.
 
I like Yearby and wish him the best but dude is a 4.7-4.8 running back that doesn't way 230lbs. It's going to be very difficult for him to make a long career in the league. Again hope I'm wrong but just don't see it.

I think Yearby is hoping to just make a practice squad. $6900 a week minimum salary. $117k if he stays on there for a season. That's good money for someone in their early 20s with a couple kids. Solid start.

Everyone understands that making a roster (active, inactive, practice) is great money.

The debate/discussion most of us are engaging in is how likely he will be to make a roster in any capacity.

And my point, throughout the Yearby discussion, is that he should have came back to Miami to help the team and to help himself.

As is pointed out in the linked article, Yearby didn't really have much special teams film. And that's what he'll need to make a roster, IMO.

Can he block? Can he tackle? Can he maintain his lane? Can he pursue? Can he be a good teammate?

He could have checked all those boxes with another year at Miami.

But if he thinks he's making a roster as a feature back, change of pace back, or 3rd-down specialist, I think he's fooling himself.

And if his goal is taking care of the family, getting more film to make a roster is in his best interest.

Seems like the kid made an ego decision, and it will likely cost him.

Unless, the Lions come calling ...

Fair points, but chances are he wouldn't increase his stock that much with another year. I think he knew that.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top