Waffle Honcho
Joaquin said dominate
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2013
- Messages
- 5,548
That's conclusive proof that Morris was better than Kaaya. There are no other variables at play.
Feel free to explain the variables.
Everything was exactly the same, so your conclusion is scientifically sound. I'm agreeing with you. All the players were the same. Experience was the same. Teams were all equally motivated.
You're right. Anything other than the conclusion that Morris was better is excuse-making and Kaaya apologist nonsense.
I'm not saying Morris was better. I'm saying quit making excuses for Kaaya.
Exactly. I'm talking your scientific study to its logical conclusion and stating that you have provided us with irrefutable proof that Morris is better than Kaaya. Morris wasn't very good. Kaaya's not as good as Morris. Therefore, Kaaya isn't very good.
That's not even close to what I said and don't want to go down one of your weird tangents again today.