Number1CanesFan
Sophomore
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Messages
- 12,610
The NCAA doesn't award scholarships. Schools do. It's the school's money. The NCAA sets guidelines and rules.This is not factual. All athletic scholarships are awarded by the NCAA.
The NCAA doesn't award scholarships. Schools do. It's the school's money. The NCAA sets guidelines and rules.This is not factual. All athletic scholarships are awarded by the NCAA.
Everyone involved is about to get a crash course.I don’t think these kids understand economics
This is not even close to accurate. Like not even same solar system kinda wrong.This is not factual. All athletic scholarships are awarded by the NCAA.
The NCAA may back them but the schools are the ones that decide who gets them, not the NCAA. it’s more like the NCAA gives money to the schools to spend, with few strings attached. The schools give them, take them away, etc...This is not factual. All athletic scholarships are awarded by the NCAA.
Why go to the moon? Why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas?How exactly is a rainbow made? How exactly does a sun set? How exactly does a posi-trac rear-end on a Plymouth work?
Yeah the players have more to lose by sitting out, assuming one team isnt adversely affected with too many opt outs. The real question is how will these pac 12 guys spend their $700 Check if they get it?If I'm second in line and the guy ahead of me bows out, I'd gladly step up and make my case that I should be in the NFL.
Did you expect them to put their money in a savings account or IRA? Facility improvements is a way for them to spend it and give something back to the athletes. buyouts are usually subsidized by boosters too
They want to be pros. And if that's the case they should be treated as such. The NFL they pay for their own air travel, hotels, and if they get in trouble they get fined. Because they are going to the school to play football and since the school is paying a cash sum, and these players should have pay for tuition. Also pros pay for their own room and board. I'm not saying players shouldn't be compensated, if this is done right in Florida it could be huge for players. But if the players want 50 percent of revinue it could get bad for them in a hurry.
Oh universities are good at teaching the fail boat of marxism... unintended consequences.That’s … definitely the schools fault.
Your right, but I stand by the rest lolYeah dude I don’t think that’s accurate. I’m certain the team covers all travel expenses related to the team lol.
This sounds nice in theory and gives everyone good feelings all around but this is actually against their own interest. These sports were eliminated because they generate no revenue, the revenue that allowed these sports to be played is basically the same revenue these players are asking for.. No business operates like thisPerhaps they're looking out for all athletes not just the ones in their sport considering football has the most leverage.
"Darkness at the break of noon, shadows even the silver spoon. The handmade blade, the child's balloon eclipses both the sun and moon. To understand you know too soon, There is no sense in trying." -- Your friend, Bob DylanHow exactly is a rainbow made? How exactly does a sun set? How exactly does a posi-trac rear-end on a Plymouth work?
Oooooh buddy things are changing
Yeah the players have more to lose by sitting out, assuming one team isnt adversely affected with too many opt outs. The real question is how will these pac 12 guys spend their $700 Check if they get it?