I really feel like the playcalling complaints are a bit overstated. In the first half, we barely even had the ball because most of the defense couldn’t tackle and I’m not sure the secondary could have covered Toledo’s cheerleaders. Not to mention a few dropped passes that would have all been big gains. Then in the second half we basically went full spread and rolled. What’s the problem?
Not trolling or anything, would simply like to hear specifically what was wrong with it. Obviously there was a good argument during that four loss streak, but I didn’t see any huge playcalling issues today.
It looked great against a weak Defense like Toledo, will it be the same vs ACC opponents?
I'm not saying Richt is the worse playcaller ever, but there were stints in the 1st half where the play calling left a lot on the field.
We should've went for it after that 82yd run by Walton, we got down to the 1yd line & couldn't score a TD.
3 bad run plays to the exact same side, should've called a quick slant out of the Gun to Cager or throw a corner fade Langham.
Not that it meant anything in the grand scheme of things, but it was noticeable imo.
I think our Offense is Good, but we have the talent to be Great & to me, it would actually help Richt out a lot if he had an additional playcaller/ another set of eyes to take hold of the Offense.