If he was the talent people on here are making him out to beat he would have played. Dallas and Homer and late round pick running backs and he couldnt take snaps from them. Robert Burns is *** and he didnt beat him out. Its obviously more than "coaches dont like him".
I've asked the question over several months and 3 or 4 different threads "Give me one reason other than "the corches suck!" as to why the staff who are the ones who have their jobs on the line would elect not to play Lo if 1) he is healthy, 2) he is ready, 3) he would benefit the team from being out there?" and not one person was ever able to offer a single answer. It just makes no logical sense. There unquestionably was more going on. I don't think we'll ever find out the truth though; we'll just get each camp's version of the story.
Then, assuming everything you said is true, what is YOUR rational explanation for why they didn't play him?
Thats what it is huh. So u the one giving out all these nonsense warnings but that's all u got to say now? Lmfao guess its personal issue with that topic in general.
That or he’s just not the same after injury. If this is the case, then not playing him makes a bit of sense, if he in fact was fully recovered. Some other team would def take a chance based on his potential. Also, not getting him hurt again is another reason if he had intensions of transferring. Coaches look after players in his position. I would assume that is the case here.
I respect your opinion but there’s nothing Manny has done this year especially on offense that makes me trust his judgement. I think Manny has become a used car salesman and I grade him on his team and player‘s performance not what he says. A good AD would have fired him this year. He has no credibility that he has done the right thing With anyone. In fact he has handles many things wrong. Since your speculating that he was still injured as the reason not to play, I will speculate also and submit coaches knew he was going to transfer and decided to punish him and reward players who were staying.
They knew he was unhappy and wanting to transfer so he was punished. Also, these coaches proved time and time again this year they don’t know what their doing. Simple as that.
Manny had zero to do with who played on offence...
That's sorta what I feared. I heard other people say stuff before but never confirmed it. Explains why between him and training being off kids dont heal up how they should.
If they knew he was transferring, then I don't have any issue with them keeping him off the field vs LaTech. But that's kind of a cart before the horse answer to my question. They wouldn't have known he was transferring until he was unhappy. So what lead to him getting unhappy; i.e. why was he not playing before which lead to him wanting out? That's where the whole conspiracy shtick has come from. The narrative being pushed is that Lo was healthy, ready and would have benefited the team being out there, but the coaches knowing that elected not to play him anyhow. I've yet to hear a single answer to why they'd do that which holds water. D's comments make a lot more sense logically.
They still got ya bruh
