No you literally said "you mean one year" when there were in fact 2 years. So your statement is false. Nice try though.No, you said Fuente has outschemed Diaz/Baker for years.
2016: 37-16 VT
2017: 28-10 Miami
2018: 38-14 Miami
2019: 42-35 VT
I said Miami crushed VT in 2017 and 2018. My statement is true. Your statement is false. Not the same.
We have said this for every gameThis game will tell us everything we need to know about manny!
A lot of reasons to be concerned here:
1) point spread
2) VT #2 rated OL by PFF. ~88 grade with an NFL LT. Can Phillips show a pass rush plan and work his hands like a vet? Can the LBs diagnose and maintain gap integrity? I have doubts...
3) Fuente has outschemed Baker/Diaz for years
4) Hooker gave the D fits last year and he's much improved as a pocket passer. Comp% up over 5pts as he's taking the easy underneath timing throws. We all know Baker loves playing soft zone and giving up those free yards
5) road game
If Miami is gonna win it may take another heroic effort from King and the WRs. Also VT is 98th in rush D giving up 5.16ypc. Maybe they show a conventional gameplan instead of the aggressive boxes and press Miami has grown accustomed to, and the run game/tempo can get going.
It's only me, the legend @The Franchise and the sharp analytics community who are concerned. The homers and square bettors are confident as ever. We'll see how it goes.
More food for thought...
We tend think that Miami has a very dynamic offense. Yet, Miami has just two offensive players who receive grades of 70+ by PFF. King's grade is a 91.6 and Mike Harley is at 73.3. That's it.
By contrast, VT has nine players that score above 70 including 3 players above 90 (LT Christian Darrisaw is at 95.8, QB Herndon Hooker is at 90.9, and Khalil Herbert is at 90.1). They have 2 other offensive starters above 80. Among these 9 players are 4 of their 5 starting offensive lineman. Their tackles are excellent and the matchup with our ends should be interesting.
Even if Herbert and Mitchell (the TE at 74.3) miss the game due to injury, VT is very formidable on offense.
We might win. We might score a lot of points. But, their offensive line will be a factor and they will move the ball on our D They will exploit our LBs and we will have a difficult time getting pressure without blitzing, which is often very predictable from Baker.
No you literally said "you mean one year" when there were in fact 2 years. So your statement is false. Nice try though.
College Football Betting: Early look at CFB Week 11 based on PFF's predictive models | NFL and NCAA Betting Picks | PFF
Using PFF's prediction algorithms as a guide, PFF's Ben Brown takes a closer look at the best games to target in Week 11 of the college football season.www.pff.com
MIAMI HURRICANES @ VIRGINIA TECH HOKIES
The Hokies let a winnable game slip away as 17-point home favorites last week. The optics from Week 10 make this a perplexing line to start the week, with these teams seemingly heading in opposite directions after their latest performances.
However, not everything was negative for the Hokies, as their offense has finally found its rhythm with QB Hendon Hooker back. Virginia Tech is third in our opponent-adjusted offensive grades, with the Hurricanes eighth in the ACC. Virginia Tech has consistently moved the ball since Hooker’s return in Week 6 — their EPA per pass play mark is at the same level as Miami‘s while their EPA per rush attempt ranks first in the ACC.
The betting market has been one-sided early in the week, with 82% of the cash and 80% of the tickets on the Hurricanes. This hasn’t caused an adjustment to the early-week spread, as the opening -2 has held throughout the week.
Typically, when something feels off in the betting market, there is a reason for it. The public will quickly look at this line and assume the Hurricanes should be favored, given their recent performance and overall ranking. They are 15th in our Elo rankings, so it is possible that we are lower on them than the market. It is also possible that our opponent-adjusted grades are undervaluing the Hurricanes' offense, but that would indicate their defense is overvalued.
This looks like an ideal spot to buy low on the Hokies while also subsequently selling high on the Hurricanes, given the recent play of Hendon Hooker. This makes for the perfect opportunity to fade the market's recency bias, with a bounce-back game for the Hokies expected by our predictive models.
Pick: Virginia Tech -2
It's only me, the legend @The Franchise and the sharp analytics community who are concerned. The homers and square bettors are confident as ever. We'll see how it goes.
More food for thought...
We tend think that Miami has a very dynamic offense. Yet, Miami has just two offensive players who receive grades of 70+ by PFF. King's grade is a 91.6 and Mike Harley is at 73.3. That's it.
By contrast, VT has nine players that score above 70 including 3 players above 90 (LT Christian Darrisaw is at 95.8, QB Herndon Hooker is at 90.9, and Khalil Herbert is at 90.1). They have 2 other offensive starters above 80. Among these 9 players are 4 of their 5 starting offensive lineman. Their tackles are excellent and the matchup with our ends should be interesting.
Even if Herbert and Mitchell (the TE at 74.3) miss the game due to injury, VT is very formidable on offense.
We might win. We might score a lot of points. But, their offensive line will be a factor and they will move the ball on our D They will exploit our LBs and we will have a difficult time getting pressure without blitzing, which is often very predictable from Baker.
My sincere hope is that the defense comes back from a questionable performance and responds with their best effort.
I have no hopes of us playing lights out on defense, but stifling them more than we did NC State is a definite possibility.But their best effort will still lead to yards and points. VT can move the ball. Not an electric offense, but they can grind you out in small chunks.
If we win, I see a high scoring game, 47-34 or so. I think VT will score. They're 24th in the country in YPG and 16th in first downs. I don't see a low scoring game. In my ideal world, we jump out ahead of them and force them to throw the ball. That's where the game can elude VT's style but if it's tight, we're playing into their style.
In my view, our defense will probably get gashed even if Herbert and Williams don't play. VT's tackles will set the edge and they will have success running wide given our slow-footed LBs. Their backup TE and WRs (Turner is rated higher than any of our WRs) will find cushion because we will often play soft zone. The reason we will play that soft zone is because Baker is probably terrified of Hooker's ability to run (valid concern as our CBs will likely be chasing WRs across the field if we play man-to-man with their backs turned away from the QB...it's the only time I believe we should mix in zone concepts with this D). Fu will also take advantage of Baker's propensity to blitz after getting frustrated that the front 4 isn't creating pressure and exploit the middle of the field.And yet with all those fancy numbers, they are one game over .500. It's a telltale sign that a team is underachieving relative to their talent level or they are a one trick pony. That high scoring game 45 point loss against UNC? Only 236 passing yards from Hooker. 42 points against Louisville? 183 passing yards. 40 points on BC? 111 passing yards. And it's not just Hooker, when Burmeister was QB he also rarely passed. They have no balance whatsoever. #4 rushing offense, #100 passing offense. Miami has the #58 rushing offense and #35 passing offense. If they want to shut down the run, great. King will slice them up. That's what all the teams since Clemson have tried and failed. If they play soft to stop the pass, well that's too easy. Go 4 or 5 wide to spread them out and King will run for 150 yards. If I'm Fuente, I'd try to split the difference and just run blitz the entire game. Make King get rid of the ball quickly before he can run. If Enos was the OC, that would be the end of Miami because that slow-*** PA would get King killed. Lashlee is smart enough to counter that with rolling the pocket and hot routes. If Jordan and Mallory are both playing, VT is toast. Also, if VT will blitz like I think they will, it would be a good time to try some Wildcat. If the QB/RB hits the hole fast enough and avoids the blitz, he's got 6 points.
PFF grades are judged by winning your play. They played a team with lesser talent at almost every position. So they should have higher scores.More food for thought...
We tend think that Miami has a very dynamic offense. Yet, Miami has just two offensive players who receive grades of 70+ by PFF. King's grade is a 91.6 and Mike Harley is at 73.3. That's it.
By contrast, VT has nine players that score above 70 including 3 players above 90 (LT Christian Darrisaw is at 95.8, QB Herndon Hooker is at 90.9, and Khalil Herbert is at 90.1). They have 2 other offensive starters above 80. Among these 9 players are 4 of their 5 starting offensive lineman. Their tackles are excellent and the matchup with our ends should be interesting.
Even if Herbert and Mitchell (the TE at 74.3) miss the game due to injury, VT is very formidable on offense.
We might win. We might score a lot of points. But, their offensive line will be a factor and they will move the ball on our D They will exploit our LBs and we will have a difficult time getting pressure without blitzing, which is often very predictable from Baker.
He played poorly against Wake. King's had a couple off games this year. Trevor Lawrence had a bad game or two. Everyone does.Last year he played in 11 games and threw 162 times. That's an average of about 14 passes per game. Thats almost exactly his average this year too. He averaged 140 ypg passing last year. This year 174 ypg. He's an average passer. Threw 3 INTs against Wake. Wake is an interesting defense to compare- they are terrible against the run, better against the pass. They forced Hooker to pass, and that exposed him. It's not just wake though that showed he's a bad passer.
Hokies are 1-3 against FBS opponents when Hooker throws for over 200 yards in the 13 games he has started in the last two seasons.
When's the last time you saw a stat where a teams chances of winning go down if the QBs passing yards go up? That's reminiscent of the GT QBs. If they were throwing a lot, it usually meant they weren't able to pick up yards with their legs and Miami was shutting down the run.
If Miami forces him to be a passer, we win the game and see the turnover chain multiple times.
Where is this narrative coming from that Hooker can't throw the ball consistently?I am not getting hyped for a Miami game. Not going to.
However, Hooker cant throw the ball on a consistent basis and the offense isnt made to let him throw all the time.
At least Dalton Keene got drafted, so his *** wont score 3 TDs on us again...
The scores I posted were based on the season (minimum 30 snaps), not solely based on the Liberty game.PFF grades are judged by winning your play. They played a team with lesser talent at almost every position. So they should have higher scores.
And they lost at home anyway.
Hoping that loss was demoralizing for them. Now they know they aren't that good, and aren't making any noise in the ACC this year.
From the fact that he cant, otherwise they would let him do it.Where is this narrative coming from that Hooker can't throw the ball consistently?
Still have to travel and have your routine disrupted. Can argue Miami's 3 worst performances this season were the 3 road games. So if you're banking on the team playing their A game I don't think it's a given. Miami can't afford another game where Baker gets badly outschemed, Phillips gets stuck on blocks and the corners don't make any plays at the catch point.Road game? During Covid? Was Liberty scared of playing at Lane?