ACCCG Not Headed Back to Charlotte

[MIA42178]

I love how everyone hates millenials but not the azzholes who raised them...maybe if your generation didn't hate people for no ******* reason like skin color and where they want to put their ****s/****s, millenials wouldn't feel the need to be so politically correct.

Us Generation Xers had nothing to do with you pajama wearing, basement dwelling mopes.
Chests aren't for shaving, and beer is best w a shotgun or funnel approach.

/we agree the game should stay in Orlando though, right?

 

[bbcane]

Politics aside, how does HB2 or it's lack thereof, have an impact on the community's ability to "ensure a safe, healthy, discrimination free atmosphere"

The NCAA is saying that there is an impact on the game which creates the lack of a safe, healthy, and discrimination-free atmosphere. Really? How? Why do they lie like that? Why not tell the truth? Which is that they have made a political decision.

Don't get me wrong, I'm thrilled with anything that takes away the game from Carolina. I hate how Carolina-centric the ACC is, so I'm ecstatic about this, especially if it comes back to Florida which I think it will. It makes the most sense.

My point is whatever side you fall on this law, this is an effort to back a political stand and be politically correct. Just tell the truth. For political reasons you don't want to have the game in Carolina. But don't pretend like this law affects anybody's safety or enjoyment. It doesn't.

The law being on the books or not on the books makes absolutely no difference. It's up to that community to pass laws which they think benefit its citizens, and they should be free to do so. They can also create enough political groundswell to repeal the law. But the NCAA's actions are strictly political. But like I said before I'm thrilled that the game is out of Carolina.

Seems like one of the few times these athletic programs are actually treating the athletes as people and not just money. This law isn't something these schools agree with so they are taking a stand. This isn't just about football, and it's entirely possible this law could affect student athletes that could be participating in acc sports.
And no **** these actions against North Carolina are political, that's what happens when you tell 5-10% of the country they don't deserve basic equal rights as others.

Lol. Don't get it twisted. It's all about money. They lose money if they stay.

 

[mossmadness]

This thread definitely delivered lol.. I'm against any forms of discrimination, regardless. It's no different than the Sharia law that's stoning folks for cheating on their husband or for being , maybe not as archaic, but the basic religious tenets is there when someone decided to write that bill. Once you create one law of discrimination, you tend to have two or three to follow. Just my take, and then on top of that, those tranny were probably using the woman's bathroom for decades, we didn't care enough to stop them then, so why stop them now, cause of what, we're trying to protect the kids. Kids are more likely to be molested, sexually abuse or assaulted by a family member than a freakin cross dresser. It's backdoor way of trying to exert religious power and doctrine into everybody lives, and I'm always going to be against that ish.

So you're saying you're against there even being bathrooms and showers and locker rooms and dorm rooms that say "men" and "women" on it? Cause that requires discrimination. There should just be rooms where every *** uses and sleeps in together at the same time? And if you don't support that, it's only for Christian reasons?
And people who could "pass" were probably using bathrooms well before this. The problem here is that liberals and gender studies types have gone crazy. So they are arguing that people that can't pass, have no intention of even trying to transition, must be allowed to use such rooms. So that's how you get this girl, in her skirt, strolling into the men's room:

Classmate Bullies Gender-Neutral Student With Photo of Them Using Boys' Restroom (Video) - The New Civil Rights Movement

Liberals then started arguing that this should be the way it works "as a matter of law." Which meant locker rooms, showers, and dorms were now part of it too. And that's when normal people starting saying, "well, if you're going to force us to draw a line in the sand, then fine." And even then, the NC law contained a compromise: if you actually transitioned, you could use the other room. But that meant the girl in the skirt in the link above couldn't use the men's room, and liberals couldn't tolerate that.

 

[bbcane]

The ACCCG needs to be back in Florida but it's weak as fck that fake politics is the reason why

Totally support the politics behind the decision. Good for the ACC.

We have a White Knight! I'm sure you support the NBA for pulling out the All-Star game from NC as well... even thought they still play games in China. Or Pay-pal pulling out 400 jobs from NC while setting up camp in Saudi Arabia.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ post.

 

[KrazyCane]

I love how everyone hates millenials but not the azzholes who raised them...maybe if your generation didn't hate people for no ******* reason like skin color and where they want to put their ****s/****s, millenials wouldn't feel the need to be so politically correct.

Being a millennial has nothing to do with being ok with mental health ppl calling themselves the opposite ***. or all this other delusional liberal social bs thats being forced down everyones throats to accept as normal when its not.

There is a difference with not agreeing with someones belief, but minding your own business, and not being ok with someones belief and going out of your way to make someone's life more difficult. I do agree that believing you're a woman, when you're born with a dyck is a mental disorder. But I mind my own business because they don't pose a threat to me or society. And last I checked, we don't discriminate against people with mental illness or mental disorders in the country. At least not anymore..

The reason why you feel certain issues are being pushed down your throat, is because people still feel they're being treated different/unjust. Gheys are still seen negative from a vast majority of the population. However, there have been more rapes of young boys by priest and sick fücks like Sandusky who claim to be "straight" than ghey men or transsexuals. But it is not the catholic priest or the coaches who people view as monsters and are afraid of. Because when it comes to priest and coaches, people realize that the majority of the are good, but those same sentiments don't apply to the other group of people unfortunately.

As someone who's political views are in the middle, I can admit that liberals are annoying AF more often than not, but the hypocrisy from the conservative folks who preach small government is baffling. it is ussually them writing some bill preventing people from doing certain things when they don't agree with their way of life. conservatives need to focus on more important things other than bathroom laws and abortion. Live and let live, "it takes two to lambada". A ghey dude in an elevator told me that once. I don't know what he meant but it makes sense.

I agree with your post about minding your own business / staying in your lane... which is what the LGBT agenda doesnt do. nobody is stressing about gxy and transexuals daily except the LGBT lobbyist and the Democratic party that thinks catering to them (when i say them im referring to the lobbyist not the individual) is a winning formula for success???

This bathroom issue was made up by LGBT and ONLY became a huge issue bc President Obama made it a huge issue for some dumb@ss reason. And it's only going to be so much ppl can take before the other side stands up for what they believe in as well and it's crazy that ppl act so in disbelief that's occurring.

Has nothing to do with hate either bc liberals and conservatives both hate those that dont side with their agenda.

Were black people staying in their lane when they faught for civil rights? My argument is just for the freedom to do whatever the **** you want with your body. The problem isn't republicans or democrats, it's conservatives....and there is a difference. Anyone who argues against LGBT using religion is automatically an idiot to me, and that's what the majority of conservatives do.

But again, the hb2 law is a problem, because statistically not allowing people to use the bathroom they associate themselves with does cause more suicides, and secondly the hb2 law isn't primarily about bathrooms. It's about making it more difficult for the LGBT community to obtain civil rights. Plus legislation such as this leads to more hate crime.

I really don't see the difference between what the LGBT community is fighting for and what the African American community was and still is fighting for.


Also the purpose of the law clearly isn't to make it so men aren't just going into women's bathroom to be creepy, because this would mean any transgender male would still have to go in a females bathroom, which would still be the same situation. It's about more than that

This LGBT "movement" is completely different than the rights the black community fought for and its a completely different struggle, LGBT not even close to a comparison.

 

[uprising]

If you think it's cool or ok for dude who thinks he's a woman to use same bathroom as ur daughter, niece, wife, grandmother etc. go castrate urself with a butter knife. And vice vice versa for the all the studs out there to.

 

[305to404CANE]

This thread definitely delivered lol.. I'm against any forms of discrimination, regardless. It's no different than the Sharia law that's stoning folks for cheating on their husband or for being , maybe not as archaic, but the basic religious tenets is there when someone decided to write that bill. Once you create one law of discrimination, you tend to have two or three to follow. Just my take, and then on top of that, those tranny were probably using the woman's bathroom for decades, we didn't care enough to stop them then, so why stop them now, cause of what, we're trying to protect the kids. Kids are more likely to be molested, sexually abuse or assaulted by a family member than a freakin cross dresser. It's backdoor way of trying to exert religious power and doctrine into everybody lives, and I'm always going to be against that ish.

So you're saying you're against there even being bathrooms and showers and locker rooms and dorm rooms that say "men" and "women" on it? Cause that requires discrimination. There should just be rooms where every *** uses and sleeps in together at the same time? And if you don't support that, it's only for Christian reasons?
And people who could "pass" were probably using bathrooms well before this. The problem here is that liberals and gender studies types have gone crazy. So they are arguing that people that can't pass, have no intention of even trying to transition, must be allowed to use such rooms. So that's how you get this girl, in her skirt, strolling into the men's room:

Classmate Bullies Gender-Neutral Student With Photo of Them Using Boys' Restroom (Video) - The New Civil Rights Movement

Liberals then started arguing that this should be the way it works "as a matter of law." Which meant locker rooms, showers, and dorms were now part of it too. And that's when normal people starting saying, "well, if you're going to force us to draw a line in the sand, then fine." And even then, the NC law contained a compromise: if you actually transitioned, you could use the other room. But that meant the girl in the skirt in the link above couldn't use the men's room, and liberals couldn't tolerate that.

So me personally, I'm about the purest form of an independent you can think of. There's **** that liberals do I don't agree with, and there's **** Conservative I don't agree with, and this happens to be one of them. There's no documented proof that transexuals using the wrong bathroom is a public health crisis. Now, trying to lump that into a general conversation about having separate locker rooms or etc is not the point. The point is that they created a law that's derive of appeasing the evangelical right in their state and what got them voted in. it's not different than the federal government forcing schools to have gender neutral bathrooms. That **** is wrong too.

The problem is discrimination, a law did not need to be created because nobody gave a fluck about that chit prior to that! You can tell they did that chit from a dumb *** religious perspective, cause they were willing to lose all that money to appease a certain group. That's why they lost the governorship, cause they're more people that think like me when you see the government do dumb chit to appease a certain group. They tried to do that chit in GA, and they X that, real quick.

 

[mossmadness]

So me personally, I'm about the purest form of an independent you can think of. There's **** that liberals do I don't agree with, and there's **** Conservative I don't agree with, and this happens to be one of them. There's no documented proof that transexuals using the wrong bathroom is a public health crisis. Now, trying to lump that into a general conversation about having separate locker rooms or etc is not the point. The point is that they created a law that's derive of appeasing the evangelical right in their state and what got them voted in. it's not different than the federal government forcing schools to have gender neutral bathrooms. That **** is wrong too.

The problem is discrimination, a law did not need to be created because nobody gave a fluck about that chit prior to that! You can tell they did that chit from a dumb *** religious perspective, cause they were willing to lose all that money to appease a certain group. That's why they lost the governorship, cause they're more people that think like me when you see the government do dumb chit to appease a certain group. They tried to do that chit in GA, and they X that, real quick.

I couldn't care less about how "middle of the road" you think you are. Being "independent" is not a substitute for intelligence.
You said you are against discrimination. Okay, great. Lets pin a moral medal on you. I just want to know how against discrimination are you? We currently carry out sexual discrimination as it concerns intimate facilities (bathroom, locker room, shower, dorms). Are you against this discrimination? If you aren't, why?
And you're just wrong. The North Carolina law EXPLICITLY allows transgender people to use the bathroom they have transitioned to. So a transgender woman is allowed to use the woman's bathroom. I'm sorry you want to believe this is about "Christian hate" or "Christian ignorance." There are legit reasons why atheists don't want to share a shower with a person of the other ***. Especially women. Which is really what this is about. A fear of "men" more than any religious crap.
And you apparently are asking for "gender neutral bathrooms." We either are allowed to have *** based discrimination in bathrooms or we aren't. If we are, it makes absolutely NO SENSE to say, "Nobody with a ***** is allowed in the girl's shower, unless that ***** is attached to somebody that doesn't fully identify as a man. and then come on in, the water 's warm." Either the government has an interest in separating penises and vaginas or it doesn't. It can't be both. So if you're saying separating them is "discrimination," then the federal government, under your world view, SHOULD be "forcing schools to have gender neutral bathrooms." That is literally what the Constitution mandates.

 

[305to404CANE]

So me personally, I'm about the purest form of an independent you can think of. There's **** that liberals do I don't agree with, and there's **** Conservative I don't agree with, and this happens to be one of them. There's no documented proof that transexuals using the wrong bathroom is a public health crisis. Now, trying to lump that into a general conversation about having separate locker rooms or etc is not the point. The point is that they created a law that's derive of appeasing the evangelical right in their state and what got them voted in. it's not different than the federal government forcing schools to have gender neutral bathrooms. That **** is wrong too.

The problem is discrimination, a law did not need to be created because nobody gave a fluck about that chit prior to that! You can tell they did that chit from a dumb *** religious perspective, cause they were willing to lose all that money to appease a certain group. That's why they lost the governorship, cause they're more people that think like me when you see the government do dumb chit to appease a certain group. They tried to do that chit in GA, and they X that, real quick.

I couldn't care less about how "middle of the road" you think you are. Being "independent" is not a substitute for intelligence.
You said you are against discrimination. Okay, great. Lets pin a moral medal on you. I just want to know how against discrimination are you? We currently carry out sexual discrimination as it concerns intimate facilities (bathroom, locker room, shower, dorms). Are you against this discrimination? If you aren't, why?
And you're just wrong. The North Carolina law EXPLICITLY allows transgender people to use the bathroom they have transitioned to. So a transgender woman is allowed to use the woman's bathroom. I'm sorry you want to believe this is about "Christian hate" or "Christian ignorance." There are legit reasons why atheists don't want to share a shower with a person of the other ***. Especially women. Which is really what this is about. A fear of "men" more than any religious crap.
And you apparently are asking for "gender neutral bathrooms." We either are allowed to have *** based discrimination in bathrooms or we aren't. If we are, it makes absolutely NO SENSE to say, "Nobody with a ***** is allowed in the girl's shower, unless that ***** is attached to somebody that doesn't fully identify as a man. and then come on in, the water 's warm." Either the government has an interest in separating penises and vaginas or it doesn't. It can't be both. So if you're saying separating them is "discrimination," then the federal government, under your world view, SHOULD be "forcing schools to have gender neutral bathrooms." That is literally what the Constitution mandates.

First off, is there a law in place that says I can get arrested for using the wrong bathroom? **** no! So a city might give me a disorderly conduct, if asked to leave by proprietor or local police officer, then it become trepassing, but that in terms of a pure law that says men must use a men's bathroom. No No No. Why the **** you can't see that! That's called a societal standard, which is a huge difference than a freaking law. You have co-ed dorms, co-ed bathrooms in some colleges, but its it against the law? That chit wasn't a problem before, it became a problem until the Feds decided to have a homosexual agenda with their administration.

The perks of living in a co-ed dorm | Campus Life News for College Students | USA TODAY College

So don't come at me with this is whole, no one is allowed in a woman's bathroom chit, cause it's not against the law, nor should one be created! It doesn't need to be. Now, am I'm going to start using a woman's bathroom, **** no, I'm a man, I stand up when I ****. Maybe you should stop worrying who got a **** or not in the bathroom, and start peeping our dumb *** chit the government tries to pull on you. You'll be the dumb *** that would push your local representative to push for a law, then get mad when your job decided to move their job to another location because of the law. It's still discrimination, whether you like it or not. Anytime you create any law that targets a group of people, I'm against! Point, blank, period. Cause it doesn't further advance society, only appease a group of people with dogmatic beliefs.

 

[KrazyCane]

All u clowns thinking some entitled privileged gxy white men can relate to the systemic historic struggles that black Ppl went through needs to think deeper and then kill themselves for even saying some dumb shxt like that???

Gxy Ppl have never been conspired against by this government, terrorized legally by this government, or oppressed as a group in any way shape or form from a historic or current stand point.

You can hide your sexual preference you can't hide being black, white g@y Ppl run this fckn country but yall think bc they couldn't legally marry before that somehow you can relate to black Ppl?? Lol hilarious

 

[mossmadness]

First off, is there a law in place that says I can get arrested for using the wrong bathroom? **** no! So a city might give me a disorderly conduct, but that in terms of a pure law that says men must use a men's bathroom. No No No. Why the **** you can't see that! That's called a societal standard, which is a huge different than a freaking bill. You have co-ed dorms, co-ed bathrooms in some colleges, but its it against the law? That chit wasn't a problem before, when did it become a problem until the Feds decided to have a homosexual agenda with their administration.

The perks of living in a co-ed dorm | Campus Life News for College Students | USA TODAY College

So don't come at me with this is whole, no one is allowed in a woman's bathroom chit, cause it's not against the law, nor should one be created! It doesn't need to be. Now, am I'm going to start using a woman's bathroom, **** no, I'm a man, I stand up when I ****. Maybe you should stop worrying who got a **** or not in the bathroom, and start peeping our dumb *** chit the government tries to pull on you.

1. It is against the law. As you just said, it forms the factual basis for laws under which you can be prosecuted.
2. It is against school regulation. It forms the factual basis for which you can be punished by a school.
3. Your coed example just shows how lost you are in all of this. NOBODY is saying you can't have voluntary sharing of intimate facilities by the different sexes. If you want to share a room with somebody of the opposite ***, go for it. The issue here is liberals want to make the option of NOT sharing a dorm room with the opposite ***, illegal. Because that requires...sexual discrimination. You, in all your independent wisdom, have said that that the desire to not share your room with somebody of the opposite *** is pure Christian based hysteria.
4. And I'm not worried about any of this. I'm a man. As i said, this is all about a fear of men. But I've lived my entire life sharing these facilities with men. If Jennifer Lawrence wants to come shower in the gym with me cause she thinks she is a man, wellllllll, who am I to tell her no! My personal belief is we should largely get the government out of this. Let private businesses decide what their bathroom policy will be (the opposite of what the liberal Charlotte bill did). But, when it comes to government buildings, there is no getting the government out of it. The government has to have some kind of policy. And that policy should be the same as it's always been since we have had government bathrooms. Its worked just fine for us, and continues to work just fine.

 

[iCaneOX]

This is exactly how our country is supposed to work.

The states have the ability to govern themselves, but be prepared to live with the consequences.

 

[Salt]

It's an unenforceable law that is purely based on discrimination and irrational fear. It's sharia law light for christians. What are they seriously going to put a bathroom attendant at every restroom and check under every slightly off looking females skirt to what genitalia they have?

All bathroom policy is based on segregation, champ. And nobody is arguing that is illegal or needs to be done away with, not even the liberals.
And most people don't like getting naked or using the bathroom around people of the opposite ***. That's not "irrational," it's pretty natural. Animals feel vulnerable when they relieve themselves. My dog eye f*cks the **** out of me when she sh*ts because she is an animal, so feels vulnerable, and is looking to me for comfort.

the thing is before the controversy nobody gave a cr@p. A man looking dyke could just as easily have walked in a men's public bathroom and used the stall to take a pee or **** and no one would have probably bothered to notice. Same with a transvestite walking into a female bathroom.

Who actually surveys a public bathroom looking at people instead of just getting your business done and getting out of that smelly place? Well maybe now that the g a y community wants so much attention drawn to itself you might have more people looking to see what kind of freaks are entering the bathroom.

 

[CaneGang757]

Shiits wack! Being from VA the ACCCG would be a great way to see Miami vs Florida State closer to home...guess I'm making the trip.

 

[Cane Dynasty]

The bathrooms and locker rooms at the Y are gender neutral. I say that to encourage everyone that want's to come participate in mat drills.

When we are on the mats we are one.

Every morning 5:30 AM sharpish.

 

[305to404CANE]

First off, is there a law in place that says I can get arrested for using the wrong bathroom? **** no! So a city might give me a disorderly conduct, but that in terms of a pure law that says men must use a men's bathroom. No No No. Why the **** you can't see that! That's called a societal standard, which is a huge different than a freaking bill. You have co-ed dorms, co-ed bathrooms in some colleges, but its it against the law? That chit wasn't a problem before, when did it become a problem until the Feds decided to have a homosexual agenda with their administration.

The perks of living in a co-ed dorm | Campus Life News for College Students | USA TODAY College

So don't come at me with this is whole, no one is allowed in a woman's bathroom chit, cause it's not against the law, nor should one be created! It doesn't need to be. Now, am I'm going to start using a woman's bathroom, **** no, I'm a man, I stand up when I ****. Maybe you should stop worrying who got a **** or not in the bathroom, and start peeping our dumb *** chit the government tries to pull on you.

1. It is against the law. As you just said, it forms the factual basis for laws under which you can be prosecuted.
2. It is against school regulation. It forms the factual basis for which you can be punished.
3. You're coed example just shows how lost you are in all of this. NOBODY is saying you can't have voluntary intimate facilities. If you want to share a room with somebody of the opposite ***, go for it. The issue here is liberals want to make the option of NOT sharing a dorm room with the opposite ***, illegal. Because that requires...sexual discrimination. You, in all your independent wisdom, have said that that the desire to not share your room with somebody of the opposite *** is pure Christian based hysteria.
4. And I'm not worried about any of this. I'm a man. As i said, this is all about a fear of men. But I've lived my entire life sharing these facilities with men. If Jennifer Lawrence wants to come shower in the gym with me cause she thinks she is a man, wellllllll, who am I to tell her no! My personal belief is we should largely get the government out of this. Let private businesses decide what their bathroom policy will be (the opposite of what the Charlotte bill did). But, when it comes to government buildings, there is no getting the government out of it. The government has to have some kind of policy. And that policy should be the same as it's always been since we have government bathrooms. Its worked just fine for us, and continues to work just fine.

No, I believe that those politicians in NC were affected by a Christian lobby group to pursue their religious freedoms, which they already fluckin have., and if you don't think they have a lobbying effort, you are blind! They tried to pass a religious bill in Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia. This is southern tr

Believe it or not I agree with #4 , because that's a thin line to walk! I just think the NC Government shouldn't force a statewide law, because what about the businesses and private locations that want to have gender neutral bathrooms. You're right, have the government stay out of it, cause it was never problem before.

 

[mossmadness]

the thing is before the controversy nobody gave a cr@p. A man looking dyke could just as easily have walked in a men's public bathroom and used the stall to take a pee or **** and no one would have probably bothered to notice. Same with a transvestite walking into a female bathroom.

Who actually surveys a public bathroom looking at people instead of just getting your business done and getting out of that smelly place? Well maybe now that the g a y community wants so much attention drawn to itself you might have more people looking to see what kind of freaks are entering the bathroom.

Lots of laws are difficult to enforce. For much of human history, poisoning was impossible to enforce. That's why the punishment called for being boiled alive. It was so impossible to find the person that did it, they hoped carrying out the worst punishment they could, would deter somebody on the off hand that chance that you did get caught. But the difficulty of enforcement doesn't necessarily mean that the law shouldn't exist.
Especially in government buildings, which is where the problem really is. The free market can take care of this in the private sector. But the government is not the free market, so it has to have some kind of policy. If you are a man, walk into the women's room in your local courthouse and hang out there. I promise you, within a short period of time, some man or woman in a uniform with a gun on their hip will be there to escort you out. Government buildings usually have some kind of officer in them, so enforcement is a lot easier than say, some private establishment.
And yeah, people that can pass aren't a problem. And the NC law actually says that. The NC law goes FURTHER than Title IX, which regulates colleges (i.e. should be at the heart of the NCAA's concerns), it what it allows transgender people to do. North Carolina allows you to continue to use the other restroom if you can pass (i.e. you have transitioned). Title IX doesn't even have such an accommodation standard to it. It allows outright banning. Which is why the Obama administration had to adopt the bizarre definition of *** that it did. It had no other choice, because Title IX left it with no other choice.

 

[Hurracanes]

This is exactly how our country is supposed to work.

The states have the ability to govern themselves, but be prepared to live with the consequences.

This. **** them.

 

[mossmadness]

First off, is there a law in place that says I can get arrested for using the wrong bathroom? **** no! So a city might give me a disorderly conduct, but that in terms of a pure law that says men must use a men's bathroom. No No No. Why the **** you can't see that! That's called a societal standard, which is a huge different than a freaking bill. You have co-ed dorms, co-ed bathrooms in some colleges, but its it against the law? That chit wasn't a problem before, when did it become a problem until the Feds decided to have a homosexual agenda with their administration.

The perks of living in a co-ed dorm | Campus Life News for College Students | USA TODAY College

So don't come at me with this is whole, no one is allowed in a woman's bathroom chit, cause it's not against the law, nor should one be created! It doesn't need to be. Now, am I'm going to start using a woman's bathroom, **** no, I'm a man, I stand up when I ****. Maybe you should stop worrying who got a **** or not in the bathroom, and start peeping our dumb *** chit the government tries to pull on you.

1. It is against the law. As you just said, it forms the factual basis for laws under which you can be prosecuted.
2. It is against school regulation. It forms the factual basis for which you can be punished.
3. You're coed example just shows how lost you are in all of this. NOBODY is saying you can't have voluntary intimate facilities. If you want to share a room with somebody of the opposite ***, go for it. The issue here is liberals want to make the option of NOT sharing a dorm room with the opposite ***, illegal. Because that requires...sexual discrimination. You, in all your independent wisdom, have said that that the desire to not share your room with somebody of the opposite *** is pure Christian based hysteria.
4. And I'm not worried about any of this. I'm a man. As i said, this is all about a fear of men. But I've lived my entire life sharing these facilities with men. If Jennifer Lawrence wants to come shower in the gym with me cause she thinks she is a man, wellllllll, who am I to tell her no! My personal belief is we should largely get the government out of this. Let private businesses decide what their bathroom policy will be (the opposite of what the Charlotte bill did). But, when it comes to government buildings, there is no getting the government out of it. The government has to have some kind of policy. And that policy should be the same as it's always been since we have government bathrooms. Its worked just fine for us, and continues to work just fine.

No, I believe that those politicians in NC were affected by a Christian lobby group to pursue their religious freedoms, which they already fluckin have., and if you don't think they have a lobbying effort, you are blind! They tried to pass a religious bill in Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia. This is southern tr

Believe it or not I agree with #4 , because that's a thin line to walk! I just think the NC Government shouldn't force a statewide law, because what about the businesses and private locations that want to have gender neutral bathrooms. You're right, have the government stay out of it, cause it was never problem before.

1. Once again, the law allows for transgender people to use the bathroom they have transitioned to. How can you claim this is about "Christian" hysteria????? Christians are letting men use the bathroom with women. They are only asking that you have actually transitioned to woman. Why is that "unreasonable"? Idiots above are comparing this to Islamic law. Can you please point me to an Islamic law that is that accommodating????
2. This just shows how lost you are. The NC government is not regulating "private locations." The law is literally called the "PUBLIC Facilities Privacy and Security Act." It's only regulating what occurs in government buildings. It allows private businesses to decide what bathroom policy they want. It's the liberal Charlotte law that regulated private business, and mandated what their bathroom policy must be.

Once again, this is alllll the result of liberals. NOBODY cared about any of this. Not even these "evil Christians." Transgender people that looked enough like the opposite *** were using the bathroom of their choice. Maybe not showers and dorms and such. But they were using the bathroom. Businesses were deciding what their bathroom policy was, and everybody went about their life, happy as can be. Then a group of liberals in Charlotte got together and said, "Nope. Everybody must accommodate you, based purely on what your gender identity is. You don't have to do anything more than say you're a woman. If you have beard and look like Mountain from "Game of Thrones," we don't care." And that's when the rest of the state said, "the f*ck did you just say?!?!?", and away we went. If the liberals just minded their own business, none of this would have been an issue.

 

[305to404CANE]

First off, is there a law in place that says I can get arrested for using the wrong bathroom? **** no! So a city might give me a disorderly conduct, but that in terms of a pure law that says men must use a men's bathroom. No No No. Why the **** you can't see that! That's called a societal standard, which is a huge different than a freaking bill. You have co-ed dorms, co-ed bathrooms in some colleges, but its it against the law? That chit wasn't a problem before, when did it become a problem until the Feds decided to have a homosexual agenda with their administration.

The perks of living in a co-ed dorm | Campus Life News for College Students | USA TODAY College

So don't come at me with this is whole, no one is allowed in a woman's bathroom chit, cause it's not against the law, nor should one be created! It doesn't need to be. Now, am I'm going to start using a woman's bathroom, **** no, I'm a man, I stand up when I ****. Maybe you should stop worrying who got a **** or not in the bathroom, and start peeping our dumb *** chit the government tries to pull on you.

1. It is against the law. As you just said, it forms the factual basis for laws under which you can be prosecuted.
2. It is against school regulation. It forms the factual basis for which you can be punished.
3. You're coed example just shows how lost you are in all of this. NOBODY is saying you can't have voluntary intimate facilities. If you want to share a room with somebody of the opposite ***, go for it. The issue here is liberals want to make the option of NOT sharing a dorm room with the opposite ***, illegal. Because that requires...sexual discrimination. You, in all your independent wisdom, have said that that the desire to not share your room with somebody of the opposite *** is pure Christian based hysteria.
4. And I'm not worried about any of this. I'm a man. As i said, this is all about a fear of men. But I've lived my entire life sharing these facilities with men. If Jennifer Lawrence wants to come shower in the gym with me cause she thinks she is a man, wellllllll, who am I to tell her no! My personal belief is we should largely get the government out of this. Let private businesses decide what their bathroom policy will be (the opposite of what the Charlotte bill did). But, when it comes to government buildings, there is no getting the government out of it. The government has to have some kind of policy. And that policy should be the same as it's always been since we have government bathrooms. Its worked just fine for us, and continues to work just fine.

No, I believe that those politicians in NC were affected by a Christian lobby group to pursue their religious freedoms, which they already fluckin have., and if you don't think they have a lobbying effort, you are blind! They tried to pass a religious bill in Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia. This is southern tr

Believe it or not I agree with #4 , because that's a thin line to walk! I just think the NC Government shouldn't force a statewide law, because what about the businesses and private locations that want to have gender neutral bathrooms. You're right, have the government stay out of it, cause it was never problem before.

1. Once again, the law allows for transgender people to use the bathroom they have transitioned to. How can you claim this is about "Christian" hysteria????? Christians are letting men use the bathroom with women. They are only asking that you have actually transitioned to woman. Why is that "unreasonable"? Idiots above are comparing this to Islamic law. Can you please point me to an Islamic law that is that accommodating????
2. This just shows how lost you are. The NC government is not regulating "private locations." The law is literally called the "PUBLIC Facilities Privacy and Security Act." It's only regulating what occurs in government buildings. It allows private businesses to decide what bathroom policy they want. It's the liberal Charlotte law that regulated private business, and mandated what their bathroom policy must be.

Once again, this is alllll the result of liberals. NOBODY cared about any of this. Not even these "evil Christians." Transgender people that looked enough like the opposite *** were using the bathroom of their choice. Maybe not showers and dorms and such. But they were using the bathroom. Businesses were deciding what their bathroom policy was, and everybody went about their life, happy as can be. Then a group of liberals in Charlotte got together and said, "Nope. Everybody must accommodate you, based purely on what your gender identity is. You don't have to do anything more than say you're a woman. If you have beard and look like Mountain from "Game of Thrones," we don't care." And that's when the rest of the state said, "the f*ck did you just say?!?!?", and away we went. If the liberals just minded their own business, none of this would have been an issue.

LOL..keep on trying to pin that Ultra conservative *** chit on Liberals. They created and passed that bill with an Ultra conservative majority, and an Ultra conservative governor signed the bill into law, since we're in the business of identifying political groups. Now they got to deal with the 300 million and over 5000 jobs they lost, hope it was worth it. I don't live in that state, and can't wait to go to Orlando to see the Canes play in the Championship game next year ( yea I'm calling it) because of dumb *** people that think this law ever made sense. Nobody gave a fluck about what bathrooms people were using prior to that, now all of sudden it's public crisis. I guess bro!