- Joined
- Oct 6, 2015
- Messages
- 8,972
I mean, I could take your talking points when I go to defend it.
And you will. That’s why these discussions are so funny. This entire thread has been an excuse-making machine for Mike Leach.
I mean, I could take your talking points when I go to defend it.
Take that advantage and put it in a system like Leach's, if not his specifically, and you have a pretty darn good formula for success.
These treads get away from the original point so easily.
South Florida is the hotbed for athletic football talent in the country.
A competently run University of Miami program should be in the driver's seat for at least 50% of it, while the rest of the country fights over what's left.
What that means is on any given Saturday, we should have a 5 to 1 or 5 to none athletic advantage over most of our opponents, certainly in the ACC Coastal.
Take that advantage and put it in a system like Leach's, if not his specifically, and you have a pretty darn good formula for success.
We should be on a one-way track most seasons to playing other elite programs. Instead, we're flubberdicking our way around the country against the Virginia, Duke, Georgia Tech, Boston College, whoever of the world.
It's that simple.
So I'm defending a theoretical coaching situation while you and a few others a defending a real coaching situation. Big difference.And you will. That’s why these discussions are so funny. This entire thread has been an excuse-making machine for Mike Leach.
So I'm defending a theoretical coaching situation while you and a few others a defending a real coaching situation. Big difference.
Funny how every single passpasspasspasspass coach in the country "just needs a DC" or "can't get defensive recruits". Did ya every think that it's because they spend 95% of their time and resources on the passing game?
Bruh are you too young to remember the Canes in the late 1980s and early 90s? People were making the exact same argument against Dennis Erickson that you are against Leach. The idea of a pass first, one- back spread offense was also considered a joke. "Show me a coach who has won without a power run game. Winning championships is about running the ball and TOP." How many national championships did Erickson have when we hired him? Feel free to look it up.
Erickson implemented a system that took advantage of S Fl athletes, which he never had access to before, and changed college football.
Leach would do the same.
LOL. His system isn't "pass first". His system is "pass only". Dennis Erickson's teams could grind out yards on the ground when they needed to.
And yet lots of blowhards said Erickson's pass heavy offense could not win championships. How many teams in the mix for the championship played without a fullback?
And yet lots of blowhards said Erickson's pass heavy offense could not win championships. How many teams in the mix for the championship played without a fullback?
Good lord.
"Pass heavy" and "all we do is throw" are two different things.
Again, at the time Erickson was hired, people thought you could not win championships with a single back "pass heavy" offense. Some very smart football people at Miami realized that Erickson's system would take max advantage of the S Fl athletes and the result was two championships.
And sorry to break it to you, but with our OL we aren't going to be "grinding out yards" even if we had OJ Simpson in his prime at RB.
Miami, 1991: 295 passing, 146 rushing
Washington State, 2018: 392 passing, 77 rushing
Yeah, looks like a clone.
Ah so you believe that Air Raid offense is incapable of being adapted if the team has a good RB and OL?
Maybe you should tell that to Lincoln Riley.
Also you didn't answer the question. What accomplishments did Erickson have that justified hiring him after JJ?
Arghhh