Consigliere
All-American
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2012
- Messages
- 21,927
i would agree with you.. but duke's been developing those guys in the same system for 6+ years... and our class that should be seniors this year... was ranked 36th in that "power ranking" page q did... 36th! that's not good, and that's what we've been leaning on.
Here's the reality....Coaches who get hired at "established" programs and do not show an ability to make chicken salad out of chicken crap quickly...rarely ever succeed.
Look at the last 15 years at the coaches who took over for fired guys....
Saban at LSU...Year 2 10-3 SEC Champs (took over a 3 win team)
Stoops at OU....Year 2 12-0 BCS Champs (took over a team that won 12 games, previous 3 years, had no QB's on roster)
Carroll at USC...Year 2 11-2 #4
Richt at UGA...Year 2 13-1 SEC Champs
Meyer at UF....Year 2 13-1 BCS Champs
Saban at Bama....Year 2 12-0 in SECCG before losing to Tebow and then Utah
Meyer at OSU.....Year 1 12-0
Mahlzan at AU....Year 1...13-1 BCS title game loss.
Jimbo at FSU...Year 1 took a 7-6 team to 10-4 and ACCCG, 12-2 Year 3
Tressell at OSU....Year 2 went 13-0 BCS Champs
Guys like Hoke, Chizik, Weis had success early and still struggled afterward.....so early success is not a guarantee.
But give me the guy who just "met expectations" on the field for 3 years and turned them into a powerhouse?
Mack Brown still won his division and was 27-11 3 years into taking over a Texas team that had 15 straight seasons without a top 10 finish before him.
Butch only lost more than 3 games twice..and had crippling scholarship losses.
I honestly ask....who is the model that we can point to and say AL can be just like him. Who is the 22-15 guy? John Cooper?
I agree Monkey, most guys at powerhouse programs don't get a chance if they don't succeed right away. They have higher expectations and they enforce these expectations.
The only guy I can think of that some could argue just "met expectations" was John Harbaugh. Clearly Stanford was an old powerhouse and nothing special recently. It took some time but even in year 3 under Harbaugh they were still losing to teams with losing records. I think some of this was okay because Jim beat #2 USC his first year and #7 Oregon and #11 USC his third year. In addition, I think people saw dramatic changes in the quality of play.
Year 1: 4-8 (3-6) [Lost to Washington 4-9 (2-7) and Wash State 5-7 (3-6)]
Year 2: 5-7 (4-5) [Lost to UCLA 4-8 (3-6)]
Year 3: 8-5 (6-3) at this point he was 17-20 [Lost to Wake Forest 5-7 (3-5)]
Year 4: 12-1 (8-1)