ThomasM
Retired from college football
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 16,630
I have heard that time after time that if a player is fighting back for the ball it should be called. Well, being interfered with can often knock a player off balance causing him to not be able to fight for the ball. It really needs to be taken out of consideration. Is a player interfered with, yes or no? There is no bonus for "Did the player fight for the ball?" It's just another excuse for them to justify making a call or not. Yes, an offensive guy can cause a DB to interfere with him in that way, thus causing a flag to be thrown. However, once the DB has mauled you, should it really be necessary to fight back for the ball to REALLY cause a train wreck of a situation? ****, our guy would probably be called for offensive PI with the refs we had last night.Imma be honest chief; yes that should’ve been a P.I, but in fairness, on the wide open opening TD for OK St, K Smith did the same exact thing & no P.I was called. The difference? OK St true freshman WR fought back for the ball & TD, our Jr TE w/ NFL aspirations faded away from the ball.
It was a horse chit called game on both sides; but the egregious call was the overturn of BJ’s 2 pt conversion. Even with that being said, I’m not going to hold the refs accountable for everything. T Couch got some horse chit P.I calls, but our WRs dropping huge balls, our def allowing a kid who caught ONE PASS all season using us as his highlight film, sloppy execution, turnovers....brother we dug our own grave.
Credit to them for actually fighting back, but we shot ourselves way too many times. Plus losing King hurt big time, obviously.