Why, because you heard it on TV? GTFOH you naive clown.
Distinguishing between causality and coincidence is very often a fool's errand. Which would explain why you're so in to it.
On the other hand, I consider the ability to cut through layers of bull**** to get to the truth to be a strength. It's a common trait among successful people, which, again, would explain why it eludes you.
I prefer evidence and data, not this Gossip Girls crap you're putting out there about what Tad Foote "actively or passively expressed his dislike" for. I understand perfectly well what you meant... it's just that it's ******* irrelevant noise and I don't ******* care. I don't care what he said or what he felt... I care what he DID.
I'm not interested in hearsay... I'm interested in facts.
And the only **** FACT anyone has brought to bear so far is that we won more games under Tad Foote than under anyone else.
So as far as I'm concerned, he was a good football president.
Hilarious.
So you pretend like you know the difference between causality and coincidence...AND THEN YOU IMMEDIATELY REFUSE TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE OF WHAT FOOTE DID TO "CAUSE" THE FOOTBALL TEAM TO SUCCEED AND YOU REST YOUR CASE ON THE COINCIDENCE THAT THE TEAM WON WHEN FOOTE WAS PRESIDENT.
It's such an idiotic argument that it is breathtaking.
So...since you are such a self-described "expert" on the ability to cut through layers of bullsh!te, then let's do EXACTLY that.
It's simple. Cut your own personal bull****e and tell us what Tad Foote "DID" (your word and capitalization, not mine) that contributed to the success of the football team. And don't tell me "he was UM President from 1981 to 2001". That is NOT causality. That is coincidence. You cannot tell me ANYTHING that Tad Foote "DID" (again, your word and capitalization).
As for your choice to slime anyone who was a student, alum, and/or booster of UM from 1981 to 2001, you are just nuts. You call it "gossip". You call it "hearsay". But I watched 15 years of what Tad Foote said and did and FAILED to say and FAILED to do in relation to the entire Athletic Department, and the football team in particular.
As for your argument, you have presented nothing. Not a **** thing except for the fact that Tad Foote was UM President from 1981 to 2001. You have chosen not to cite EVEN ONE THING that Tad Foote did to causally contribute to UM's athletic success. Except cash his own paycheck for 20 years.
At this point, I'm done with you, and I think everyone else is done with you (except for your upvote pal, Craptical Envelopment). You are entitled to your insane opinion that Tad Foote "was a good football president".
But you're wrong. And fact-free. And argument-free.
Rational people who were there from 1981 to 2001 know the truth. And that's not gossip or hearsay. It's what we all saw and heard and witnessed.