Let me get this straight, Flowers, Walford (7tds), Dorsett (10tds), Duke (13 tds, over 2k yards from scrimmage), DP (first team ACC, third team all American, BUTKUS AWARD FINALIST) Feliciano, and Chickillo were the problem last year? You might could make a case they didn't do enough, but you will never make the case that they were the problem.
LOL
That's 20 of 26 receiving tds, and 10 of 19 rushing tds, or 2/3 of all offensive tds scored last year.
DP had **** near twice as many tackles per game as the next closest guy.
Only soft shouldered dudes claim they need leadership to do better than 1 int and 20 total tackles. What happened to holding yourself accountable? Blaming the dudes who propped the team up last year is not accountability. He needs to start by asking himself why a walk on had 35 more tackles than he did last year. He played more? Well that's still on Tracy Howard.
Don't talk about accountability when you're blaming the players who did the most for the team last year. Shut your mouth, get on the field and make plays.
I agree with this 100%. So you're telling me that these guys, the ones who were probably the most productive players on the entire team, were the problem? Dorsett, who willingly blocked downfield, even as a smaller WR, and who should have got the ball more, or Feliciano, who moved all over the place to help the team, or Chick, who put on 45 lbs to play out of position in our garbage scheme, or Denzel, who threw his body around, played in a rotation of only 5 LBs all year, who was often left unprotected because of our scheme and our lack of DTs/NTs to eat up blockers, and Duke, who was the all time leading rusher and all purpose yardage player at the school, that these guys were the problem? I simply have a difficult time believing that.
Maybe Duke and Chick and Perryman showed frustration and didn't always feel positively - can you blame them? What else could those guys do to help the team? If you think we're frustrated as fans, how frustrated must those guys be to do all they could and see us still fail? Were those guys perfect? No. But to suggest that they were the reason our team was divided strikes me as a way for the coaches to again deflect blame from themselves.
One other thing I just don't get about something said in these interviews - that certain guys were entitled. What does that even mean? How does that happen on a team that hasn't beaten FSU since Golden was here, a team that hasn't won a bowl game since the blue turf bowl, a team that hasn't won a division title since we're in the ACC? I simply don't know how an attitude of entitlement could be present on a team that has fallen below expectations year after year. It's one thing to hear that some of the young guys on the 2004 team felt entitled, as they had seen us go through a dominant run and maybe felt that they "deserved" success without earning it, but this team simply has no reason to have a similar feeling.