Oh my god another round of S&C threads.
As opposed to another round of:
-Rosier sucks threads
-Richt is god/idiot
-Diaz is god/idiot
S&C is a serious question. Guys with 2 years in the program shouldn’t/wouldn’t look fat or weak or thin. UGA, OSU, Auburn, Clemson, Wisconsin and Miami played yesterday and Miami looked the smallest. And, I’m just talking about the kids identified as freshman or sophomores.
You need to stop injecting your personal limitations into these threads.
The "looked small/smallest" is my favorite line of discourse. It's the most reliable metric we have at our disposal and one reason I don't even look at player weights and strength numbers, I look at how well they fill out their uniform.
Your wording is confusing. You're saying our freshman and sophomores are the only ones who look too small, yet also evaluating "guys with 2 years in the program"? Which is it?
S&C is the hobby horse of the fan base, along with cleat color, sock height and knee pads. The fact that S&C could have genuine bearing on games and the other toys cannot does not make it a smoking gun, it just makes it convenient. What I saw last night was a depleted, overmatched team who got run over by far more than a more dominant S&C program.
What if we don't have enough players that can carry elite size and elite speed? (We don't) You want Goldie era meatheads just so you can feel good about a silhouette? All the times when we are the fastest team on the field, were you complaining about how small we looked? No, because on those days the hobby horse doesn't ride, despite my injected limitations.