OriginalCanesCanesCanes
All-ACC (#1 most reproted porster on CIS)
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 35,270
@dsddcane ....I know you remember Shipman....
I remember Shipman. He could fly in the straight line.
@dsddcane ....I know you remember Shipman....
100m runners don't run the same style. There are many different body types and styles. Some start faster in the splits, some end faster in the splits. Not sure what you mean by "Maintaining speed", that's not very specific. Maybe you should lead below and learn something.
After NFL combine every year there will be some fans arguing how players can perform in 100m sprint race. Also, fans will also argue what is the real 40-yard dash record ran by Bo Jackson when there is electronic timers.
Therefore, I do some researches on how the time split of 100 meter sprint athletes can be related to a short distance run. I am using the result of 100 meter Man 2009 Berlin Championship Sprint where Usain Bolt broke his world record 9.58s here (data can be retrieved here).
Normally a 100m sprint athlete reach his top speed at around 50m, consider the acceleration of athlete is changing it is hard to compute a very accurate result. Fortunately the 20m time split of athlete is highly linear (Graph of some athlete's 20m split and their R2 value are often 0.999 or higher). It is due to elite athlete reach their 90% speed near 20m and the acceleration and deceleration is small compare with their speed (Speed of medal winner can be found here).
As the graph plotted above the slower athlete tends to have a more gentle slope and smaller y-intercept in their 20m split graph. Therefore, by comparing the slope and intercept we can find how their time for short distance change with their 100m time.
By using all available time in 2009 Berlin Championship relationship of their slope and intercept is plotted as below.
Slope
Y-intecept
However, the error will accumulate when the athlete is slower.
Error in 100m time
To tackle the problem I use estimated 100m time to normalize the estimated time to actual 100m time in order to make it more accurate. This is the excel file which consist all the data and graphs.
It has a calculation tools to calculate 40-yard dash time out of 100m time. Be careful that the data will be extremely inaccurate after 13s 100m
A quick convert or tl;dr of the calculation
Finally it is some comparison of NFL player time and estimated time (Note that NFL combine and 100m sprint is running on two types of floor and 100m sprint time is their best time, so small variation is expected). As players compete much more times for their personal best, feel free to add ~0.05s for more probable calculation.
100m time Estimated 40-yard dash 9.79 4.2 10.27 4.3 10.64 4.4 10.95 4.5 11.21 4.6 11.45 4.7 11.73 4.8
NFL player 100m time 40-yards dash Estimated time Difference Chris Johnson 10.38 4.24 4.327511 -0.08751 DeMarcus Van Dyke 10.61 4.25 4.390455 -0.14045 Dri Archer 10.49 4.26 4.35658 -0.09658 Jerome Mathis 10.49 4.26 4.35658 -0.09658 Jacoby Ford 10.32 4.26 4.312426 -0.05243 Jeff Demps 10.01 4.26 4.242679 0.017321 J. J. Nelson 10.49 4.28 4.35658 -0.07658 Brian Witherspoon 10.22 4.29 4.288456 0.001544 Darrius Heyward-Bey 10.3 4.3 4.307516 -0.00752 Josh Robinson 10.77 4.33 4.439304 -0.1093 Tye Hill 10.27 4.34 4.30026 0.03974 Michael Huff 10.13 4.34 4.268097 0.071903 Travis Benjamin 10.4 4.36 4.332659 0.027341 Devery Henderson 10.4 4.36 4.332659 0.027341 Roy Williams 10.3 4.36 4.307516 0.052484 Brandon Banks 10.42 4.37 4.337867 0.032133 C. J. Spiller 10.29 4.37 4.305083 0.064917 Reggie Bush 10.42 4.38 4.337867 0.042133 Jamaal Charles 10.23 4.38 4.290788 0.089212 Andre Johnson 10.59 4.4 4.384648 0.015352 Joe McKnight 10.59 4.4 4.384648 0.015352 Lamar Miller 10.56 4.4 4.37606 0.02394 T. J. Graham 10.21 4.41 4.286138 0.123862 Devin Hester 10.42 4.41 4.337867 0.072133 Cordarrelle Patterson 10.54 4.42 4.370415 0.049585 Denard Robinson 10.44 4.43 4.343137 0.086863 Average 10.39577 4.340769 4.333608 0.007162
lol. Guys that can flat cover guys, as you call have a speed element to their game so....
When was the last time that we had a true speedster who was also good at corner? Artie burns?
Also keep in mind that those 6' 4.4 CBs didn't help much while Purdue and Iowa were running train on the Taint defense the past couple of years.Don't get too jealous. Miami was 1st in pass efficiency defense. Ohio State was 44th.
Like I can’t believe anyone in their right mind would try to correlate 36.6 meters (40 yard dash) into a 100 meters......that’s even stupid for the board.
You don’t know where that guy is stringiest at...it could be the start, the middle or even the finish but for a MFer to say “nowhere near” is some of the dumbest crap I’ve ever read...
Where are the 100m times from? High school or college?
Just out of curiosity where did sanguinetti end up signing at? I know once word got out on his lack of athleticism he wasn’t a take anymore for a lot of programs.i dont think we have offered any burners.
I think they prefer size to the true speed.
The img kid is a track kid so he can run. Not sure if we get him though.
DMoney we got to see these opening results foreal. Still remember seeing Sanguinetti's early last year and calling it out that he wasnt that athletic. We are gonna see it with alot in this years group as well i believe.
IndianaJust out of curiosity where did sanguinetti end up signing at? I know once word got out on his lack of athleticism he wasn’t a take anymore for a lot of programs.
Yikes!Indiana
You get that with huff and brooks. Huff at times played safety for sta and at his previous school and brooks has legit high 4.58 speed or so
Tf are you talking about let’s not make things up?, he ran a 4.62 laser 2 years ago at the Nike opening. He’s a special athlete and if he tested last year without the injury he would have had a 125 plus score imoWhere are you getting Brooks is a legit 4.58. Last time he ran was as a sophomore, when he was just a skinny kid. Then got hurt and played his senior year slowly getting back to 100%. I like Brooks, but let's not make things up.
joe haden ran 4.7 and was pretty good in the nfl. hips and technique matter more for a corner
He ran 4.7 on his first attempt buddy. Nice try thoHaden ran a 4.57. Let's not make things up.
Cambell doesn’t upset me so much because he was never coming here. Henderson is the one that really ****es me off because Rumph made a huge rookie mistake with chewing him out before he signed which obviously ****ed the kid off and he went to UF. The kid was coming to UM prior to that. In recrutung you have to feed the ego a little until there signed and then tear them a new ***. Rumph should have been smarter then that as signing day was just a few days away. After the fax comes in then let him know that’s not how Canes conduct themselves.This is why we're paying the price for missing on Campbell & Henderson.
Tf are you talking about let’s not make things?, he ran a 4.62 laser 2 years ago at the Nike opening. He’s a special athlete and if he tested last year without the injury he would have had a 125 plus score imo
View attachment 80456
He was also 18 years old against a pretty good schedule
He ran 4.7 on his first attempt buddy. Nice try tho
So like I said the last time he ran was 2 years ago, when he was much lighter, was't a 4.58, and had a major injury. Again I love the potential of Brooks, not trashing the kid by any means and glad we got him, but we don't make to make things up.
Maybe after being here, getting even healthier and in a cfb strength & conditioning he'll get to 4.58 (which would make him an absolute monster). I'm just saying we don't need to make things up.