Tetragrammaton Cane
14-0
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2017
- Messages
- 2,485
Not sure what your argument is. The NRA is **** bent on there never being a database so that invalidates everything you have in bold...which is almost your entire answer. Even proposals to put tracers I. The gun powder that could effectively “track” has been a non-starter with the NRA.Yes, my point exactly. We have all that in place for cars and we still have alot of casualties. And not coincidentally, at a higher rate with younger men, same as these shootings. Im sure a good amount of people in the board lost friends to auto accidents during their teens years and NOT ONCE did anyone ever think the solution was to ban cars. We monitor these young men closer (they get pulled over more), we provide counseling (defensive driving course) we do what we can to save them and help them, we dont ban all cars. Are you able to follow the logic now? Theres something wrong with these kids, we ban guns , that something is still there.
unless your argument is you're fine with the casualty numbers as long as the tool is being monitored by the government?
You’re not making a single serious argument. It’s like you’re running the UNC 4-Corner’s offense but you’re down by 30 with 30mseconds to go. LOL.
Last edited: