BigDikCane
All-American
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2011
- Messages
- 12,889
Dammit mane... Brandon Washington tried to warn these dudes...
No one is complaining because the RB stable is loaded. If AR82 leaves, with the way Dugans has been recruiting WR, people won't complain about him declaring either.
Alabama is typically loaded and gets production out of everyone by their 3rd year.
Ummmmmmm.....no. If a guy like Christian Wilkins who would've likely gone in the 1st round this year tears an ACL, I'm willing to bet that he's not going in the 1st round next year. Also, if you have a significant lack of production compared to your junior year, that's also another black mark.
Defensive end Kentavius Street, who tore his anterior cruciate ligament in a pre-draft workout with the New York Giants, got drafted by the 49ers in Saturday's fourth round. Later, in the sixth round, the 49ers took Florida safety Marcell Harris.
Harris had decided to return for his redshirt senior season, hoping to boost his draft stock in 2017.
Instead, a torn right Achilles tendon in the summer sidelined him for the entire fall and left him with even more to prove to NFL scouts and decision-makers.
Running Back is one of the only positions that can make a legitimate argument for leaving early year in and year out but than again look at Yearby. Btw i dont think homer is better than Walton. I think homer goes later unless he has a huge year.Pinckney's play is day 1/2 draft potential. But as you've said, a lot of teams are going to see the way he treats his body as a major red flag. Not taking care of your body in the NFL leads to more injuries and a shortened career.
I don't think Homer's a top 3 round draft pick (he's close and likely to go around where Walton went draft rankings-wise). But agree on the other 3 you mention. For RBs, I don't necessarily disagree with them leaving though given their short window to make money so long as they have a legit chance of actually making a team (like Walton).
In no way should McCloud and Bethel even think about leaving early. I agree with the general sentiment on the board - Richt needs to get in their ear along with Pinckney's and tell them to come back for their senior years. Shaq's one that if he takes the next step, I don't know how you realistically tell him to come back.
This is more accurate than funny. And anyone that tries to rationalize with Norton leaving early (ie - you don't know his financial situation, he wouldn't have done mucsomeh better, etc.) just needs to stfu.
Some of these guys just won't do much better from year 3 to year 4. And once you get into the bottom half of the third round, there's not that much difference in salary. Look at how the chart levels off toward the bottom of the third round. Norton might not lose much by going now and he gets an extra year of his slightly lower salary. I didn't see anything that told me he would make a big leap and become a high third round pick if he stayed. There are enough space-eaters around. He was not an exceptional one-tech or NT type.
Running Back is one of the only positions that can make a legitimate argument for leaving early year in and year out but than again look at Yearby. Btw i dont think homer is better than Walton. I think homer goes later unless he has a huge year.
Shaq and Pink would have to have monster years next year if they're going to consider leaving early. As of now, they're both in that good, not great category.
These guys need to get the whole "second contract" nonsense out of their heads. Most players don't make it to a second contract. If you're drafted in the 6th round or later, there's a good chance you dont make it through the first season, let alone first contract. Late round picks are expendable. Get picked late and dont wow your team immediately? Your *** is cut. Any chance you have at improving your draft stock, even if it's one round, is worth staying for.
How do you not see it?I disagree,...as I'm just not seeing what you're seeing.
Not sure the direction you'd really like to go discussing possible injuries,...as it would only push MORE of our players out of the door to leave early.
But as you can see,...more-proven kids still get their shot.
I hate posting on internet message boards, but given how poor the analysis is on this thread, I couldn't help myself...
The previously posted chart shows that there's virtually no difference between the compensation of a 3rd rounder and of a 7th rounder (and do a quick google search for UFA salaries- you'll see that they're the same as a 7th rounder's). But you have 1 more year of income if you leave early, so really you're only better off staying if you're drafted in the top ~50 of the following year. Per the chart, that's the point at which you make more than a draftee in Rounds 3-7/UFA + one full year of earnings. How many guys can actually work themselves into the top 50? Well, not many - less than 50 in the entire country...
So as long as you make a roster, and assuming you develop at the same rate as which you would in college, the vast majority of guys are better off going pro as soon as possible. The first contract has incremental value for only a very small % of players
[And of course I've left off the value of a college degree, yada yada...but many of these guys don't complete their degrees anyways, and they can always come back to finish their credits at a later date. It's certainly valuable, but probably not a needle mover for most guys with realistic shots at an NFL future]
Some don't care about establishing long term relationships and just want to make a buck as quick as possible, even if it means losing out on potentially more later on.
You do realize that the first measurable on that graph is $5 mil, right?
I'll just counter with this- let's look at RJ specifically. He was the 2nd pick of the 5th Round. Let's say conservatively he would've gone as the 2nd pick of the 3rd Round if he came back. Here is the salary differential of the two guys that went in both of those spots to the Niners last year (via ovethecap.com):
George Kittle signed a 4 year contract worth $2,698,296 with the 49ers on May 11, 2017. Kittle received a guarantee worth $298,296 including a $298,296 signing bonus.
Ahkello Witherspoon signed a 4 year contract worth $3,884,665 with the 49ers on May 11, 2017. Witherspoon received a guarantee worth $973,572 including a $973,572 signing bonus.
This is just a 2 round differential and you're claiming there's virtually no difference between a 3rd rounder and a 7th rounder? And that even negates the added benefit of the job security a lot of guys get from being a 4th round pick or better since teams are less prone to admit mistakes and cut those guys as quick.
I don't buy that. Another year in Richt's system and an improved defense giving him better field position and scoring opportunities could have done wonders.You can't compare Kaaya and RJ/Norton. Kaaya was a 6th round talent regardless of whether he came back. He had nothing left to show scouts. RJ and Norton had the opportunity to come back and drastically improve their draft position.
You do realize that the first measurable on that graph is $5 mil, right?
I'll just counter with this- let's look at RJ specifically. He was the 2nd pick of the 5th Round. Let's say conservatively he would've gone as the 2nd pick of the 3rd Round if he came back. Here is the salary differential of the two guys that went in both of those spots to the Niners last year (via www.overthecap.com):
George Kittle signed a 4 year contract worth $2,698,296 with the 49ers on May 11, 2017. Kittle received a guarantee worth $298,296 including a $298,296 signing bonus.
Ahkello Witherspoon signed a 4 year contract worth $3,884,665 with the 49ers on May 11, 2017. Witherspoon received a guarantee worth $973,572 including a $973,572 signing bonus.
This is just a 2 round differential and you're claiming there's virtually no difference between a 3rd rounder and a 7th rounder? And that even negates the added benefit of the job security a lot of guys get from being a 4th round pick or better since teams are less prone to admit mistakes and cut those guys as quick.