Chard
Redshirt Freshman
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2016
- Messages
- 1,001
I actually like what I read regarding Rosier:
"As for Rosier, Rumph and safeties coach Ephraim Banda said the offseason improvement has been obvious.
“Malik doesn’t get enough credit,” Rumph said. “We give him some looks and disguise really well in practice and he picks up what we’re doing, did a darn good job against our defense. He’s gotten a lot better, was more consistent with accuracy this spring.”"
If the staff is consistent, then they will stick with Rosier if he can keep the turnovers down. He can convert with his feet as well. The gist of the critique of Perry in that article is what Rosier has excelled at. It is also what coach pointed out liking about Williams:
"“He has a lot of potential for a young guy,” Rumph said. “He spins the ball well. What I was impressed with is he moved in the pocket a good amount. He throws a check down to the back and I’m wondering how he saw it. He has tremendous vision. Some throws from the far hash to the other side of the field were impressive. His arm strength and maneuverability in the pocket, I like what I saw. He made some mistakes but had good decisions, too.”"
Look, Rosier has his flaws but so does every other QB in college football. The difference usually comes down to which QB has the oline to protect and give that QB time. Add in a good run-blocking line and almost any QB will look good. Having said all that, I certainly hope Rosier can make better throws this year regardless of the oline situation. That was one of the most frustrating aspects of his play last year. Quite frankly, it cost them the Pitt game.
Regarding the battle between Williams & Perry: Sheeeeeet. I'm happy to be back to the days of having too much talent at QB. Next year, they battle it out after hopefully getting some live-game experience this year. I just don't see either one taking over the #1 spot this year. If they do then either the season will have started off with a thud or one of those two are just too good to keep off the field. I suspect Richt won't take a senior QB out of the #1 spot without either one of those reasons (not counting the new red-shirt allowance). His comments so far support that assumption.
"As for Rosier, Rumph and safeties coach Ephraim Banda said the offseason improvement has been obvious.
“Malik doesn’t get enough credit,” Rumph said. “We give him some looks and disguise really well in practice and he picks up what we’re doing, did a darn good job against our defense. He’s gotten a lot better, was more consistent with accuracy this spring.”"
If the staff is consistent, then they will stick with Rosier if he can keep the turnovers down. He can convert with his feet as well. The gist of the critique of Perry in that article is what Rosier has excelled at. It is also what coach pointed out liking about Williams:
"“He has a lot of potential for a young guy,” Rumph said. “He spins the ball well. What I was impressed with is he moved in the pocket a good amount. He throws a check down to the back and I’m wondering how he saw it. He has tremendous vision. Some throws from the far hash to the other side of the field were impressive. His arm strength and maneuverability in the pocket, I like what I saw. He made some mistakes but had good decisions, too.”"
Look, Rosier has his flaws but so does every other QB in college football. The difference usually comes down to which QB has the oline to protect and give that QB time. Add in a good run-blocking line and almost any QB will look good. Having said all that, I certainly hope Rosier can make better throws this year regardless of the oline situation. That was one of the most frustrating aspects of his play last year. Quite frankly, it cost them the Pitt game.
Regarding the battle between Williams & Perry: Sheeeeeet. I'm happy to be back to the days of having too much talent at QB. Next year, they battle it out after hopefully getting some live-game experience this year. I just don't see either one taking over the #1 spot this year. If they do then either the season will have started off with a thud or one of those two are just too good to keep off the field. I suspect Richt won't take a senior QB out of the #1 spot without either one of those reasons (not counting the new red-shirt allowance). His comments so far support that assumption.