Thanks Brock, that's my QB!
LOL if you think just reporters are what I got that from you need to think harder
He’s saying in that statement whoever the winner is HAS to be the quarterback at Miami while the 2 losers in the battle wants to be the quarterback, since there is a total of 3 in the race that makes sinceNot saying Jarren is out, because I don't have a clue as to what is happening with the QB race, but there seems to be some truth to the fact that this is down to a two man race, at least in the eyes of Diaz. In the quote below, he starts out by acknowledging that after the spring he felt good about all 3 QB's. He then changed his tone later in the conversation. Who's the two guys? I don't know, but I just came across this quote from Diaz (SIAP)....
"We went from January 1st not having a quarterback on our campus we could win with, to on April 20th we had three quarterbacks on our campus we could win with. We had to go into the summer, let those guys be on their own, when coaches around allowed to watch, really found out who would take control of the football team.
Two of the guys want to be the quarterback at Miami, one of the guys has to be the quarterback at Miami. I don’t know which guy that is here. I’m going to find out here in the next two or three weeks. Whatever guy that is, he’ll take the first snap against Florida at Orlando on the 24th."
I disagree, even though you may be right. The statement that you are referring to, Manny had made on several occasions. In my opinion, this is not one of those times.He’s saying in that statement whoever the winner is HAS to be the quarterback at Miami while the 2 losers in the battle wants to be the quarterback, since there is a total of 3 in the race that makes since
You are awfully nice for assisting guys on this board with reading comprehensionHe’s saying in that statement whoever the winner is HAS to be the quarterback at Miami while the 2 losers in the battle wants to be the quarterback, since there is a total of 3 in the race that makes since
Agreed, that's exactly what he was saying.He’s saying in that statement whoever the winner is HAS to be the quarterback at Miami while the 2 losers in the battle wants to be the quarterback, since there is a total of 3 in the race that makes since
That quote is as straight forward as it gets. He's saying two of the three only WANT to be the QB but one of the three NEEDS to be the QB and the one who needs it will win. I don't see how u interpret that any other way.Not saying Jarren is out, because I don't have a clue as to what is happening with the QB race, but there seems to be some truth to the fact that this is down to a two man race, at least in the eyes of Diaz. In the quote below, he starts out by acknowledging that after the spring he felt good about all 3 QB's. He then changed his tone later in the conversation. Who's the two guys? I don't know, but I just came across this quote from Diaz (SIAP)....
"We went from January 1st not having a quarterback on our campus we could win with, to on April 20th we had three quarterbacks on our campus we could win with. We had to go into the summer, let those guys be on their own, when coaches around allowed to watch, really found out who would take control of the football team.
Two of the guys want to be the quarterback at Miami, one of the guys has to be the quarterback at Miami. I don’t know which guy that is here. I’m going to find out here in the next two or three weeks. Whatever guy that is, he’ll take the first snap against Florida at Orlando on the 24th."
.....
Two of the guys want to be the quarterback at Miami, one of the guys has to be the quarterback at Miami. I don’t know which guy that is here. I’m going to find out here in the next two or three weeks. Whatever guy that is, he’ll take the first snap against Florida at Orlando on the 24th."
This: “His barber is costing him a shot at starting QB”
You could very well be correct, my friend. I viewed it as a case of parapraxis on Diaz part, but I could definitely be wrong.Reg, I’m also reading this as there will be (future tense) two guys that will want to be the guy, one guy that HAS to be the guy, or can be the guy. For a total of three.
That’s how I’m interpreting it.
So the way I’m reading it, is that he’s not saying it’s been narrowed down to two.
I think you’ll see in future statements, and upcoming interviews, where he’ll say it’s still a three-man race. I’d be willing to bet money on that. Right up until the second week of practice or so.
We had a system???No. He was a redshirt frosh. He had plenty of time in the system. He was given every chance to succeed. The fact is he blew it. Again, watch the tape. It’s obvious Perry made 2-3 bad plays to every good one. He doesn’t have it upstairs. That isn’t going to change enough for him to be a good QB based on his OC or QB coach. Especially not when it comes out he couldn’t handle audible and protection calls. He’s not the answer.
Baseless speculation is a cool sport