theibisrules
Senior
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2012
- Messages
- 9,427
Duke is a beast man plain and simple.
I love Duke but does nobody feel he is slightly overrated ? I'm trying to think of one BIG game where he showed out, not against teams the soft acc teams
I love Duke but does nobody feel he is slightly overrated ? I'm trying to think of one BIG game where he showed out, not against teams the soft acc teams
From reading all the articles on both Duke and Cook, I thought Cook was a much superior athlete as well. However after I checked their results from the Opening which is a good comparison of what type of athlete they were at the same age, this is what I found: Cook is bigger and taller but Duke is the better athlete. Yearby’s measurable are identical to Duke but he is not quite the athlete.
It's pretty clear Cook is the better athlete going by this. I mean, 16 lbs heavier and only .04 behind in 40 time and .08 in shuttle is not a big difference.
I still maintain that at the same point in their careers, Duke is/was the better RB, while Dalvin might have more potential due to being bigger and close to the same speed.
Oh, and Berrios' SPARQ rating is ridiculous lol
Duke is good but Cook is AP........u aint catching him n his body can take hits unlike duke. More of an NFL back.
Duke is good but Cook is AP........u aint catching him n his body can take hits unlike duke. More of an NFL back.
How the fug is cook ap? Cook hasn't done ish in college and didn't ap have injuries while at OU?
Duke is good but Cook is AP........u aint catching him n his body can take hits unlike duke. More of an NFL back.
How the fug is cook ap? Cook hasn't done ish in college and didn't ap have injuries while at OU?
He has that type of talent, just watch the film. Stats mean **** I mean look at J12 second most tds. Let ur eyeballs do the test not ur heart. Cook is better by a big marginIMO
why do people say cook is faster then duke? link or stfu
Because Cook doesn't get caught from behind
Duke is good but Cook is AP........u aint catching him n his body can take hits unlike duke. More of an NFL back.
How the fug is cook ap? Cook hasn't done ish in college and didn't ap have injuries while at OU?
He has that type of talent, just watch the film. Stats mean **** I mean look at J12 second most tds. Let ur eyeballs do the test not ur heart. Cook is better by a big marginIMO
so Cook is just a better Lamar Miller?
cook will be more durable than Duke. duke is a freak but not a consistent between the tackles guy.
cook will be more durable than Duke. duke is a freak but not a consistent between the tackles guy.
This stuff blows my mind. Duke is great between the tackles, runs extremely hard. Where does this idea come from?
cook will be more durable than Duke. duke is a freak but not a consistent between the tackles guy.
This stuff blows my mind. Duke is great between the tackles, runs extremely hard. Where does this idea come from?
cook will be more durable than Duke. duke is a freak but not a consistent between the tackles guy.
This stuff blows my mind. Duke is great between the tackles, runs extremely hard. Where does this idea come from?
From reading all the articles on both Duke and Cook, I thought Cook was a much superior athlete as well. However after I checked their results from the Opening which is a good comparison of what type of athlete they were at the same age, this is what I found: Cook is bigger and taller but Duke is the better athlete. Yearby’s measurable are identical to Duke but he is not quite the athlete.