Canes dynasty I’m with you. If I had my way let Perry or Williams take this team to next level. I guess CMR thinking is if Rosier can get us a win in Dallas it is his team to lead, if not then bring on Perry or Williams to lead with lesser teams to get experience for the rest of the season.Wouldn't miss it for the world.
So you're gonna have to either hit the ignore button or deal with my view until this schit show gets fixed.
We got 3 answers at QB.Canes dynasty I’m with you. If I had my way let Perry or Williams take this team to next level. I guess CMR thinking is if Rosier can get us a win in Dallas it is his team to lead, if not then bring on Perry or Williams to lead with lesser teams to get experience for the rest of the season.
Rosier is not the answer, or is he a very good QB all he has is live game experience. He proved that last year, all those great wins happened because the team picked him up. He will throw bad balls and miss wide open receivers. He makes poor decisions during the game.
I live and die by my Canes and have been a fan before most of you were born. My expectations are National Championships anything less is a bad season. I will be with them this season regardless. Go Canes!
Throwing for 43% against the worst FSU team in 3 decades, 50% and 3 pics against v.tech and a completely invisible meaningless performance against ND is what led us to those victories?
that LSU game is soooo huge, I can't stress that enough. Just get outta there with a win in Dallas and then the schedule sets up where you can assume - knock on wood - that there will be blowouts where somebody(N'kosi or Williams) can get some quality game reps and really become a guy who is ready to come out of the bullpen by the time UM gets to the heart of ACC play
Yeah, I'm not surprised that Richt stated Rosier is the starter - but he didn't say this was set in stone. He will be like 'Captain Hook' this season, IMO.
Im not a Rosier guy but in his defense, if Ahmonn Richards is healthy, I think that changes the whole complexion of this offense. And if this Oline can just run block more consistently, Miami has it's best stable of backs since around 2001 and they should be able to control down and distances to help Rosier along
But again, can a guy who completion percentage was in the low 50's(which is abysmal) suddenly be a guy who can be in the low 60's? Personally I think if we can get Malik to be 58-59% we should be overjoyed by that
I think if you listen to what the coach said, after spending all off season pouring over film, he was pretty **** clear: we won 10 games last season because of the play of Malik Rosier.I think that had more to do with a bend but don't break D and a lot of timely turnovers. Plus when you consider that FSU was a mess and V.tech was average at best... we lucked out with a fairly easy schedule.
In saying all of that, i don't deny he is probably our best option as crazy as it sounds. Seems like N'kosi still doesn't have it between the ears and its really hard to go with a true freshman. Even though Jarren appears like he could be MIami's first truly elite QB since before any of these kids were born.
I clearly needed a snickersIm just ******* with you
I think if you listen to what the coach said, after spending all off season pouring over film, he was pretty **** clear: we won 10 games last season because of the play of Malik Rosier.
i agree on jarren.I think that had more to do with a bend but don't break D and a lot of timely turnovers. Plus when you consider that FSU was a mess and V.tech was average at best... we lucked out with a fairly easy schedule.
In saying all of that, i don't deny he is probably our best option as crazy as it sounds. Seems like N'kosi still doesn't have it between the ears and its really hard to go with a true freshman. Even though Jarren appears like he could be MIami's first truly elite QB since before any of these kids were born.
He was also the reason we collapsed and were in those close games against FSU, GT and Syracuse. But okay.
We got 3 answers at QB.
1. Malik Rosier
2. N'Kosi Perry
3. Cade Weldon
4. Jarren Williams
In that case, I look forward to not hearing from you until 2019...since there's no need to even watch this season.This isn't 1985 when a championship caliber QB would be developed for 3 years before taking over. We are in an era where freshmen and certainly RS freshmen QBs, are dominating at the top level of CFB.
None of you would have believed when Richt was hired that going into year 3 of his tenure Rosier would be the starting QB. It's either a recruiting problem or a development problem. But if the goal is to win championships, it's a big problem because we obviously aren't winning a championship with Rosier.
It's either a recruiting problem or a development problem.
Not even the last 3-4 games. He struggled from day one. He ran out of luckInteresting... still, he hasn’t flat out dropped N’Kosi or Jarren from being options if needed. I think we go into the LSU game with Rosier, and then see how he performs. If he’s better than last season as far as his reads go and pocket awareness, plus throwing more accurately....then I think he will remain the starter. If he gets off the blocks like his performances the last 3-4 games of last season...I think Richt makes a change
Kaaya leaving early set us up for possibly 2 years of Rosier. Had Kaaya stayed Rosier doesn't start, and we never put any pressure on Perry or feel disappointed he didn't beat out Rosier. Had Kaaya stayed we would be looking at a different QB competition where Rosier, the least talented QB, has no real game time experience advantage over the young guys.This isn't 1985 when a championship caliber QB would be developed for 3 years before taking over. We are in an era where freshmen and certainly RS freshmen QBs, are dominating at the top level of CFB.
None of you would have believed when Richt was hired that going into year 3 of his tenure Rosier would be the starting QB. It's either a recruiting problem or a development problem. But if the goal is to win championships, it's a big problem because we obviously aren't winning a championship with Rosier.
This isn't 1985 when a championship caliber QB would be developed for 3 years before taking over. We are in an era where freshmen and certainly RS freshmen QBs, are dominating at the top level of CFB.
None of you would have believed when Richt was hired that going into year 3 of his tenure Rosier would be the starting QB. It's either a recruiting problem or a development problem. But if the goal is to win championships, it's a big problem because we obviously aren't winning a championship with Rosier.
Don't always agree with you on the QB issue, but can't fault your logic here.Not even the last 3-4 games. He struggled from day one. He ran out of luck
Kaaya leaving early set us up for possibly 2 years of Rosier. Had Kaaya stayed Rosier doesn't start, and we never put any pressure on Perry or feel disappointed he didn't beat out Rosier. Had Kaaya stayed we would be looking at a different QB competition where Rosier, the least talented QB, has no real game time experience advantage over the young guys.
I agree. Year 3 Richt should have a QB in place. Quite frankly, I think there's a reason they really wanted Williams to enroll early. They know the situation better than any of us
Syracuse would have been his biggest game without the drops. I don't use the Syracuse game as an example, because it was the one game where he, for the first half, hit every target and made good decisions. I kept saying, "He finally looks good and someone else has to mess up!"Don't always agree with you on the QB issue, but can't fault your logic here.
I also think Richt fully expected Allison to win the QB comp last season.
Except for the "struggled from day 1" part. There were times when he struggled, but times when he flashed. Not only at the end of games. He started 9/9 at Duke, and was 5/5 on the first possession against Syracuse until Richards dropped a ball in the end zone.