Definitely, Khalan laborn just looks more explosive and like a running back compared to Akers imo. I dont Think he’s healthy all the way and he’s barely been used
Yeah laborn, I got three letters right lol
Definitely, Khalan laborn just looks more explosive and like a running back compared to Akers imo. I dont Think he’s healthy all the way and he’s barely been used
It's of no relevance aside from indulging my general NFL malaise but I think we have a better stable of backs right now than my Steelers. No joke. With James Conner very injury prone I think I'm taking the Canes group.
I think Harris would fit into Pittsburghs scheme well. He's low to the ground, hits the hole hard, and is very fast. Snell and Conner are big bruising backs. Lingard and Dallas are very different style runners than these guys. If Lingard lives up to his 5 star billing then I would agree with your assessment. I would not as of today. Imagining Dallas in a Bell type run game is fun to think about.
Clemson RB
BC RB
Akers
Off top of my head are all better
If you still believe Cam Harris or Lingard are better you simply arent paying attention. Could they be better? maybe in a year or 2. But rn its not even closeYou have Dillon, Akers, Etienne just to name a few. He may not be the best back on our team lol
exactly, he hasn’t. That’s not what’s expected of a #1 rb in the country whatsoeverEtienne
Dillon
Dallas
Cam Akers has worlds potential but hasnt done **** so Im not just gonna give it to him
“Not even close” I dont Know about that . Cam has had 2 55 plus yard runs called back and if not you would be saying different imo. He has ran very well this year and when lingard is ready he will tooIf you still believe Cam Harris or Lingard are better you simply arent paying attention. Could they be better? maybe in a year or 2. But rn its not even close
Dillon is NFL-starter level.
You have Dillon, Akers, Etienne just to name a few. He may not be the best back on our team lol