There isn't a candidate out there that doesn't have some inherent risk, personally I'll ride with the guy who I know has done it before at Miami and who when you listen to, has that passion and desire to make this team great again.
Michael Irvin was on Mike and Mike this morning talking about the kick-off return and coaching search. When asked about Butch Davis in his age Irvin paused for a second. Didn't sound like he wants Butch or he knows that Butch isn't coming. Also said that Butch is the fans favorite, but not everybody else.
There's also the issue that Southern Cal apparently has taken a pass on both Herman and Fuente.
They have passed on Herman because Herman is totally unproven. He is 8-0 in his first season in a mediocre conference. Since when is that enough to qualify a HC to take an elite job like USC, or even a great job like the U?
As for Fuente, his D sucks. He also coaches in a horrible conference.
Herman and Fuente could end up being elite head coaches, but a hire like that is risky.
There's zero question about Butch's recruiting, evaluation prowess, passion, or reputation. He's obviously a very desirable candidate.
But I really think some people are way too quick to dismiss or completely overlook that the only offense he's fielded in the last 10 years was abysmal, slow paced, behind the times, and conservative despite having NFL talent at UNC. If he plans to hire an innovative OC with a much more dynamic approach than John Shoop, then it won't even be an issue. But it's an area of unknown and a legitimate concern, IMO, considering our advantage of having access to premier skill talent locally.
I would take either one. I don't understand the hate for Strong. He's having a tough time in texas, but he just may not be a good fit there. Kinda like rich rod at michigan. We will know how serious they are (and how much money they are willing to spend) if Richt gets fired at Georgia.
So you are saying you want Rich Rod? B/C if not, then you are simply racist.
There's zero question about Butch's recruiting, evaluation prowess, passion, or reputation. He's obviously a very desirable candidate.
But I really think some people are way too quick to dismiss or completely overlook that the only offense he's fielded in the last 10 years was abysmal, slow paced, behind the times, and conservative despite having NFL talent at UNC. If he plans to hire an innovative OC with a much more dynamic approach than John Shoop, then it won't even be an issue. But it's an area of unknown and a legitimate concern, IMO, considering our advantage of having access to premier skill talent locally.
I'm concerned as well but he's the only candidate of that type that I could be happy with. That is why I'm so against Richt and Strong, conservative, boring hires.
Don't understand why so many think a "pro-style" offense is the only way. Too many athletes down here not to take advantage of it.
There's zero question about Butch's recruiting, evaluation prowess, passion, or reputation. He's obviously a very desirable candidate.
But I really think some people are way too quick to dismiss or completely overlook that the only offense he's fielded in the last 10 years was abysmal, slow paced, behind the times, and conservative despite having NFL talent at UNC. If he plans to hire an innovative OC with a much more dynamic approach than John Shoop, then it won't even be an issue. But it's an area of unknown and a legitimate concern, IMO, considering our advantage of having access to premier skill talent locally.
I'm concerned as well but he's the only candidate of that type that I could be happy with. That is why I'm so against Richt and Strong, conservative, boring hires.
Don't understand why so many think a "pro-style" offense is the only way. Too many athletes down here not to take advantage of it.
I don'the mind. Having a conservative offense is a misnomer. The 01 canes had a traditional, "conservative " offense, and they dropped 50 on everyone. It's coaching guys up and doing what works for you. Louisville put up points because they had good players and we're coached well. Harbaugh is doing it in Michigan with a traditional "conservative" offense. We need a great coach who can coach up our kids well. Our teams have not been untalented. We have lost a bunch of games where the other team didn't recruit as well as us. We need someone who can keep recruiting well, and coach the team up.
Michael Irvin was on Mike and Mike this morning talking about the kick-off return and coaching search. When asked about Butch Davis in his age Irvin paused for a second. Didn't sound like he wants Butch or he knows that Butch isn't coming. Also said that Butch is the fans favorite, but not everybody else.
I don'the mind. Having a conservative offense is a misnomer. The 01 canes had a traditional, "conservative " offense, and they dropped 50 on everyone. It's coaching guys up and doing what works for you. Louisville put up points because they had good players and we're coached well. Harbaugh is doing it in Michigan with a traditional "conservative" offense. We need a great coach who can coach up our kids well. Our teams have not been untalented. We have lost a bunch of games where the other team didn't recruit as well as us. We need someone who can keep recruiting well, and coach the team up.
But 2000-02 were super-teams. It shouldn't take a dozen first-rounders to score 40 ppg.
01Canes,
You and I are in the same boat with Butch. I love his floor and the fact that he's without doubt the best in the game at evaluating and building a roster.
I'm hesitant about him though because of his pedestrian offenses and his last staff at UNC. Shoop was a complete disaster not unlike Bill Miller on the defensive side here who he stuck with for 4 horrible years.
How did Butch manage to never sniff the Coastal title at UNC despite loading that roster with more talent than anyone else in the division?
I don't claim to have all the answers. ****, I'm still trying to figure out how to have my *** eaten without looking like a bytch with my legs up in the air. But I'd prefer to take a gamble on a less sure thing like Herman with what I see as a higher ceiling and a faster turn around time. I can see Herman winning right away and being a juggernaut here.
Davis would take time like he always does, and I'm concerned with his philosophical approach on the offensive side of the ball. I don't see his approach to offense as taking the best advantage of the types of players right in his backyard at UM.
We trust Butch knows how to evaluate HS Players. I will give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he knows how to evaluate coaching talent as well. If he thinks Dorsey is ready, Im all for it.
I don't claim to have all the answers. ****, I'm still trying to figure out how to have my *** eaten without looking like a bytch with my legs up in the air.
01Canes,
You and I are in the same boat with Butch. I love his floor and the fact that he's without doubt the best in the game at evaluating and building a roster.
I'm hesitant about him though because of his pedestrian offenses and his last staff at UNC. Shoop was a complete disaster not unlike Bill Miller on the defensive side here who he stuck with for 4 horrible years.
How did Butch manage to never sniff the Coastal title at UNC despite loading that roster with more talent than anyone else in the division?
I don't claim to have all the answers. ****, I'm still trying to figure out how to have my *** eaten without looking like a bytch with my legs up in the air. But I'd prefer to take a gamble on a less sure thing like Herman with what I see as a higher ceiling and a faster turn around time. I can see Herman winning right away and being a juggernaut here.
Davis would take time like he always does, and I'm concerned with his philosophical approach on the offensive side of the ball. I don't see his approach to offense as taking the best advantage of the types of players right in his backyard at UM.
I don't claim to have all the answers. ****, I'm still trying to figure out how to have my *** eaten without looking like a bytch with my legs up in the air.
:sanford: