forums

Allison transferring

why not go after Zaire?? whats the downside? He's probably better than Rosier and Sheirrifs, and doesn't hurt our numbers cause he's a grad transfer. He knows how to run the RPO and is more athletic than any QB we have...
 
Advertisement
Dwinstitles said:
Cane Dynasty said:
brock said:
Didn't dmoney already vouch for dee, come on now...
Click to expand...

I vouched for [MENTION=12910]Brooklyndee[/MENTION] and still do.

You don't need any other co-signer.
Click to expand...

show me
Click to expand...

show you where I vouched for him? fvck it will take some digging but I will. Plenty of people here read the post.

Here it is:

Cane Dynasty said:
TP801 said:
More fake insder BS. However you could be right.
Click to expand...

Hear ye! Hear ye!

There isn't a more cynical porster on these boreds than myself. I was as critical of [MENTION=12910]Brooklyndee[/MENTION] 's claims as anyone. So he sent me a PM and wanted to meet up and chat. Since he wasn't down for mat drills at the Y we met at Rao's (private table behind the kitchen) so we could chat and I could suss him out.

After that conversation I can without hesitation put the [MENTION=7366]Cane Dynasty[/MENTION] stamp of authenticity on [MENTION=12910]Brooklyndee[/MENTION]

He is the goods. We are actually lucky he's here.
Click to expand...

Yall can keep hatin' but he doesn't even post 10% of the info that he has on here.
 
Last edited:
ilovelamp51 said:
The Franchise said:
So he changed the system to fit a QB who isn't on the team yet and hasn't even practiced? Allison was a top guy but Rick insisted on changing the system to fit guys he doesn't have yet? OK.
Click to expand...

He implemented the system which he considered best for the future of the program, recruited the player he thought would most efficiently run said system.. & attrition was the result. Try to keep up.
Click to expand...

So you think Rick was dumb enough to implement a system that required a running QB when he had the least mobile QB in college football because he wanted to recruit mobile QBs in the future? You can't be this dim.
 
Well this is unexpected

qrT9bE2.gif
 
Last edited:
streetja said:
Oh look guys another delusional "bro, we good with 2 rbs bro" "bro, fvck having a senior QB come back to lead this team bro" "a 170lb true freshman QB is going to be great bro"

Any valid criticism on the program and this board goes into full sob mode. It takes the 4th year of Golden's tenure for guys like you to see what's happening
Click to expand...

Valid criticism is deserved, I've given Rick plenty of it especially regarding his playcalling and offensive approach since it resulted in L's during the L streak last year.

Your pvssy lips are flapping about shīt basically out of his control. The 3rd/4th string QB deciding to transfer because he couldn't and wouldn't keep up and/or had accuracy issues.

Somebody whose trajectory looked like it was going to be way down at the end of the bench, and you're hyperventilating like you need smelling salts and a fainting couch like some chick.
 
He wasn't going to beat out Arrogate. Shocking development.

As I posted a couple of months ago, Jack Allison is a good basic quarterback who reminds me of Brandon Doughty of the Dolphins. A guy like that belongs at a smaller school so he can put up big numbers without threat of incomers who are actually...better than him.

Mark Richt wasn't going to settle for Brandon Doughty, not when he was visions of all these cheap prancing touchdowns with an athlete at the position. I still have no idea how that recent thread reached so many meaningless pages, the thread mostly devoted to all the quarterbacks who aren't named N'Kosi Perry.

College coaches these days love cheap touchdowns, throttled up from high school coaches who wouldn't know what to do without cheap touchdowns. By far my favorite offseason program this year was the Gruden QB camp episodes and how he ruthlessly mocked the RPO offense along with bubble screens, etc. It was priceless. A magnificent litmus test these days is opinion of RPO and similar offenses. Gruden knows that those are garbage plays that don't do anything for a team moving up the ladder, but the lazy coaches are too clueless to differentiate situational variance. Those plays work against the bottom feeders. No kidding. Everything works against those teams. You've accomplished nothing except to fool yourself and limit yourself. And when you are a stacked program you can abuse those plays also. No kidding. The 2001 Canes could have used any offensive style and made it look great. Likewise with recent Alabama and Ohio State and Clemson and any program with numerous premium picks entering the NFL Draft every year. Beat Alabama with Deshaun Watson and Mike Williams. Good plan. The Dunces of Outlier thrill to that plan.

But when you are stuck in that normal range of a good but not great roster with a handful of top tier players, nothing is more laughable or defines you as a sucker than reliance on RPO or similar tinkerbell finesse.
 
streetja said:
Salt said:
streetja said:
itsacanething said:
streetja said:
Hmm let's see, Richt was unable to convince Yearby and Gus when we desperately needed them back. And now we lose the only current QB on the roster from schools worth a ****.

So no, I do have reason to think it would happen.
Click to expand...
if the kid is leaving it is on the kid. he might have a good reason or he might have a bad reason but its on him. how do you fault the staff that clearly would play anyone at QB that gave them the best chance to win. when players leave 90% of the time its because they were buried on the depth chart and they thought they could play elsewhere.
Click to expand...

He can't sell a guy on competing for the starting job? If not for this year next year? He can't get creative enough with a pitch to have him stay when for the sake of depth we really need him?

Richt has lost 4 players this year that were absolute position of need. I'm beginning to see a pattern.
Click to expand...


Pattern I am noticing is that these were all guys recruited by the last coach and were falling in the depth charts
Click to expand...

What depth chart were the RB's falling behind? The other guys recruited by the same coach as walton and homer?

The four guys that could've stayed another year, now five with Jack, we lost this offseason were needed. Regardless if it was because they could contribute or they were just needed for depth.
Click to expand...

yes, those guys. They were falling in the charts not getting enough playing time for a variety of reasons and I suspect did not feel any sense of loyalty to Richt. And just so you know Walton WAS recruited by Richt.
 
I'm pretty new to this site so I don't get some things, but what's up with all the typos? Are they planned? Is Kayak an inside joke name for Kayaa? Just one example, but I'm curious.
 
Advertisement
From a source in the program before he transferred

1. Allison didn't do **** last year and chased pu$$y and drank his way like a normal college freshman. Never took the bull by the horns and prepared like he would be the guy his year.

2. He doesn't have it up there. Honestly kinda airhead like and didn't have a grasp of the playbook and took way too much time to make reads

3. First scrimmage when he got knocked out was right after a pick and a fumble. Not good under pressure

4. Not what Richt wants in a qb now. I can't blame him bc we've never had a running threat which is so critical these days

It's a shame but it's really hard to recruit the mental aspect of the position. Good luck to him
 
Suarez said:
why not go after Zaire?? whats the downside? He's probably better than Rosier and Sheirrifs, and doesn't hurt our numbers cause he's a grad transfer. He knows how to run the RPO and is more athletic than any QB we have...
Click to expand...

Been saying this for awhile. He'd be the best qb on the roster by a mile. Perfect for RPO crap
 
Awsi Dooger said:
He wasn't going to beat out Arrogate. Shocking development.

As I posted a couple of months ago, Jack Allison is a good basic quarterback who reminds me of Brandon Doughty of the Dolphins. A guy like that belongs at a smaller school so he can put up big numbers without threat of incomers who are actually...better than him.

Mark Richt wasn't going to settle for Brandon Doughty, not when he was visions of all these cheap prancing touchdowns with an athlete at the position. I still have no idea how that recent thread reached so many meaningless pages, the thread mostly devoted to all the quarterbacks who aren't named N'Kosi Perry.

College coaches these days love cheap touchdowns, throttled up from high school coaches who wouldn't know what to do without cheap touchdowns. By far my favorite offseason program this year was the Gruden QB camp episodes and how he ruthlessly mocked the RPO offense along with bubble screens, etc. It was priceless. A magnificent litmus test these days is opinion of RPO and similar offenses. Gruden knows that those are garbage plays that don't do anything for a team moving up the ladder, but the lazy coaches are too clueless to differentiate situational variance. Those plays work against the bottom feeders. No kidding. Everything works against those teams. You've accomplished nothing except to fool yourself and limit yourself. And when you are a stacked program you can abuse those plays also. No kidding. The 2001 Canes could have used any offensive style and made it look great. Likewise with recent Alabama and Ohio State and Clemson and any program with numerous premium picks entering the NFL Draft every year. Beat Alabama with Deshaun Watson and Mike Williams. Good plan. The Dunces of Outlier thrill to that plan.

But when you are stuck in that normal range of a good but not great roster with a handful of top tier players, nothing is more laughable or defines you as a sucker than reliance on RPO or similar tinkerbell finesse.
Click to expand...

Do you actually believe what you just wrote?

And you're giving credence to a tv personality that hasn't coached in the modern era, and was a horrific offensive and QB coach in his last job.

Because a fūcking pro team didnt turn it's ten year trajectory completely around last year using RPO variants? Yeezus get a fūcking clue
 
jd716 said:
I'm pretty new to this site so I don't get some things, but what's up with all the typos? Are they planned? Is Kayak an inside joke name for Kayaa? Just one example, but I'm curious.
Click to expand...

Just a joke. I don't think there is much inside to it. Bard Kayak is how some people will put it at times.
 
I would bet thay all of you saying he is, "not a fit for Richt's offense" are the same porsters who still can't grasp that the spread option and the RPO are different things. Allison could have been plenty successful in Richt's PRO STYLE offense. He has size, athletic ability and arm talent to do so. There is no reason he wasn't the #1 QB this Spring other than he didn't put in the extra work to get himself ready. It wasn't a lack or talent or being in the wrong system, that's just nonsense.

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
 
Advertisement
Awsi Dooger said:
He wasn't going to beat out Arrogate. Shocking development.

As I posted a couple of months ago, Jack Allison is a good basic quarterback who reminds me of Brandon Doughty of the Dolphins. A guy like that belongs at a smaller school so he can put up big numbers without threat of incomers who are actually...better than him.

Mark Richt wasn't going to settle for Brandon Doughty, not when he was visions of all these cheap prancing touchdowns with an athlete at the position. I still have no idea how that recent thread reached so many meaningless pages, the thread mostly devoted to all the quarterbacks who aren't named N'Kosi Perry.

College coaches these days love cheap touchdowns, throttled up from high school coaches who wouldn't know what to do without cheap touchdowns. By far my favorite offseason program this year was the Gruden QB camp episodes and how he ruthlessly mocked the RPO offense along with bubble screens, etc. It was priceless. A magnificent litmus test these days is opinion of RPO and similar offenses. Gruden knows that those are garbage plays that don't do anything for a team moving up the ladder, but the lazy coaches are too clueless to differentiate situational variance. Those plays work against the bottom feeders. No kidding. Everything works against those teams. You've accomplished nothing except to fool yourself and limit yourself. And when you are a stacked program you can abuse those plays also. No kidding. The 2001 Canes could have used any offensive style and made it look great. Likewise with recent Alabama and Ohio State and Clemson and any program with numerous premium picks entering the NFL Draft every year. Beat Alabama with Deshaun Watson and Mike Williams. Good plan. The Dunces of Outlier thrill to that plan.

But when you are stuck in that normal range of a good but not great roster with a handful of top tier players, nothing is more laughable or defines you as a sucker than reliance on RPO or similar tinkerbell finesse.
Click to expand...

Another "bring back the wishbone" **** of a post from Awsi!
 
kmwcane said:
Awsi Dooger said:
He wasn't going to beat out Arrogate. Shocking development.

As I posted a couple of months ago, Jack Allison is a good basic quarterback who reminds me of Brandon Doughty of the Dolphins. A guy like that belongs at a smaller school so he can put up big numbers without threat of incomers who are actually...better than him.

Mark Richt wasn't going to settle for Brandon Doughty, not when he was visions of all these cheap prancing touchdowns with an athlete at the position. I still have no idea how that recent thread reached so many meaningless pages, the thread mostly devoted to all the quarterbacks who aren't named N'Kosi Perry.

College coaches these days love cheap touchdowns, throttled up from high school coaches who wouldn't know what to do without cheap touchdowns. By far my favorite offseason program this year was the Gruden QB camp episodes and how he ruthlessly mocked the RPO offense along with bubble screens, etc. It was priceless. A magnificent litmus test these days is opinion of RPO and similar offenses. Gruden knows that those are garbage plays that don't do anything for a team moving up the ladder, but the lazy coaches are too clueless to differentiate situational variance. Those plays work against the bottom feeders. No kidding. Everything works against those teams. You've accomplished nothing except to fool yourself and limit yourself. And when you are a stacked program you can abuse those plays also. No kidding. The 2001 Canes could have used any offensive style and made it look great. Likewise with recent Alabama and Ohio State and Clemson and any program with numerous premium picks entering the NFL Draft every year. Beat Alabama with Deshaun Watson and Mike Williams. Good plan. The Dunces of Outlier thrill to that plan.

But when you are stuck in that normal range of a good but not great roster with a handful of top tier players, nothing is more laughable or defines you as a sucker than reliance on RPO or similar tinkerbell finesse.
Click to expand...

Another "bring back the wishbone" **** of a post from Awsi!
Click to expand...

Was he the one that posted that wishbone shīt a while back?
 
Awsi Dooger said:
He wasn't going to beat out Arrogate. Shocking development.

As I posted a couple of months ago, Jack Allison is a good basic quarterback who reminds me of Brandon Doughty of the Dolphins. A guy like that belongs at a smaller school so he can put up big numbers without threat of incomers who are actually...better than him.

Mark Richt wasn't going to settle for Brandon Doughty, not when he was visions of all these cheap prancing touchdowns with an athlete at the position. I still have no idea how that recent thread reached so many meaningless pages, the thread mostly devoted to all the quarterbacks who aren't named N'Kosi Perry.

College coaches these days love cheap touchdowns, throttled up from high school coaches who wouldn't know what to do without cheap touchdowns. By far my favorite offseason program this year was the Gruden QB camp episodes and how he ruthlessly mocked the RPO offense along with bubble screens, etc. It was priceless. A magnificent litmus test these days is opinion of RPO and similar offenses. Gruden knows that those are garbage plays that don't do anything for a team moving up the ladder, but the lazy coaches are too clueless to differentiate situational variance. Those plays work against the bottom feeders. No kidding. Everything works against those teams. You've accomplished nothing except to fool yourself and limit yourself. And when you are a stacked program you can abuse those plays also. No kidding. The 2001 Canes could have used any offensive style and made it look great. Likewise with recent Alabama and Ohio State and Clemson and any program with numerous premium picks entering the NFL Draft every year. Beat Alabama with Deshaun Watson and Mike Williams. Good plan. The Dunces of Outlier thrill to that plan.

But when you are stuck in that normal range of a good but not great roster with a handful of top tier players, nothing is more laughable or defines you as a sucker than reliance on RPO or similar tinkerbell finesse.
Click to expand...



Please join the 21st century.

The upside of running a pure pro-style offense isn't worth the difficulty of implementing it.

Besides, NFL teams run RPOs now.
 
Back
Top