articles
Comments (171)
More tiny LBs we hope to add size to. Great.
Bobby ***** plays in my head whenever he hits someone
Once again with those stats and that speed, why is this kid not a 4 star?
@JHallCanes , note the nickname in the OP and the OG thread too 
So far, we have one flip and one miss with a nickname since you said it was a quasi recruiting law that nicknames are the kiss of death.
So far, we have one flip and one miss with a nickname since you said it was a quasi recruiting law that nicknames are the kiss of death.
I could fight it but I won’t@JHallCanes , note the nickname in the OP and the OG thread too
So far, we have one flip and one miss with a nickname since you said it was a quasi recruiting law that nicknames are the kiss of death.
We need to break the streak somehow
Neither was my neighbor next door until I saw her topless.
Right. Didn’t he just have a top 10 defense without 4/5 star talent. Can we not trust the process?
Unfortunately that doesn’t speak to the quality of the neighbor though.
Stop making sense please.
Brother, some ppl rather believe vs. know the truth.
Mellons is mellons bro!
Won’t really push back here. I agree with the rankings sentiment. My point more was to push back on the “we don’t pay our coach x amount of dollars to flip kids from Rutgers”. Mainly you can’t complain about 1 instance and ignore the countless others (5 stars). Specifically, accumulating more 5 star trench players than almost every other team. Including the number 1 player in the country this cycle.
Does WR recruiting need to be better? Sure, we haven’t hit on an elite guy. But I don’t have much issue with the past two cycles. I’ll hold judgment on this cycle until it’s over. LB, ya it can also be better but we have a blue chip LB committed this cycle. At the time, we thought Hayes was. I personally think Wiley should be in that category (top 300 as you say).
So I generally don’t agree with the OP about “where are the blue chips”. I also feel strongly about belittling a kid within hours of him committing to the team we all cheer for. Maybe that’s just me, but just a qualm I have.
First Rutgers stint wasn't in the big ten
Attachments
these havent been aging well lately. One year does not indicate a coach is good or will be good, remember Mel Tucker. If Lashlee's success is sustained for 3 or 4 years then we can say he's a good coach. Remember Mario has 2 power 5 conf titles and would have qualified for the playoff multiple times if it was 12 teams. The bar is significantly lower now. Im curious though, how would this board have reacted if we made the playoffs and then got smoked by 4 touchdowns in the first round? Some how I dont think it would have been hailed as some great accomplishment. But again anything to sht on Mario, carry on.
And I just looked at SMU's schedule last year. Mario would have been undefeated or 1 loss at the most and been in the ACC championship game and made the playoffs no doubt with that schedule.
Last edited:
No. We need LBs that can read/diagnose the play. If they are big, all the better, but not essential.
