forums

Worst loss in program history

Let’s try to find a way into AAC, just admit this is a G5 program and then the losses will be less painful. He’ll maybe then we can even win our division and even conference occasionally.
 
raincane said:
Let’s try to find a way into AAC, just admit this is a G5 program and then the losses will be less painful. He’ll maybe then we can even win our division and even conference occasionally.
Click to expand...

lsu had a horrific home loss too. The issue is, we don’tspend like LSU go get the right assistants that money can buy to assist this fraud of a hc.
 
I had my doubts but I bought in to the 3 game winning streak. Figured we blow out FIU, beat Duke and ultimately win our bowl game...but we are back to the future. We stink! Classic giving us hope and then the big let down and back to reality.
We lost bragging rights for the city of Miami. Let that sink in....smh.
 
jsy said:
If it was a win over a double digit favorite and we we won by over 10?

I guarantee no one would care how we won,
This is the equivalent of us beating Clemson by two scores

A good coach wins that’s the bottom line
Click to expand...

Again- faking injuries is described in the NCAA rulebook as dishonest, unethical, and against the notion of fair play.

You are saying its acceptable to be a dishonest and unethical person if it helps achieves a goal.

Frankly, people who think like you disgust me and are a disgrace. Where do you draw the line- is it only ok to be unethical in meaningless sports competitions? How about cheating customers if it puts more money in your pocket? What about lying on a resume? If it helps you land that high paying job- you think its ok to fake a degree? How about faithfulness to a spouse?

You place winning above integrity and honor. Read the Bible and let me know if you find a passage saying it's ok be an unethical and dishonest person it helps you win. Like I told the other guy- if you really believe that, then please, for the sake of the world, don't have children.
 
raincane said:
Let’s try to find a way into AAC, just admit this is a G5 program and then the losses will be less painful. He’ll maybe then we can even win our division and even conference occasionally.
Click to expand...
Can’t take the easy route. No matter how gloomy it is we are canes. We play whoever whenever. Can’t take the easy route and still wear the U.
 
CaneLife said:
Ok strawley. We get it.
Click to expand...

Ok ****ty unethical person who doesn't believe in honor or integrity, I get it. Winning an amateur competition matters more than playing within the rules. Agree to disagree. Please don't have children.
 
TimeB0mb said:
Ok ****ty unethical person who doesn't believe in honor or integrity, I get it. Winning an amateur competition matters more than playing within the rules. Agree to disagree. Please don't have children.
Click to expand...
It is within the rules. That’s the point. Grey area? Sure. Ethical? No. But when you’re given the space to veer a bit to the left or right and still be within those rules, and that veering allows you to defeat an opponent, you do it. Period. End of conversation. If I’m in a ditch w my guys depending on me to be ethical or throw sand in the face of our enemy, guess what. Sand wins every time. We get to go on to fight another day and I’m not feeling bad about not being “fair”. Would I take a $20 I see fall out of someone’s pocket? Of course not. But this is a competive sport you jack wagon.
 
TimeB0mb said:
Ok ****ty unethical person who doesn't believe in honor or integrity, I get it. Winning an amateur competition matters more than playing within the rules. Agree to disagree. Please don't have children.
Click to expand...
And I do have kids you cuck. You’ll know them because they’ll be the ones overlooking your pathetic offsprings application for gardeners and house cleaners.
 
CaneLife said:
It is within the rules. That’s the point. Grey area? Sure. Ethical? No. But when you’re given the space to veer a bit to the left or right and still be within those rules, and that veering allows you to defeat an opponent, you do it. Period. End of conversation. If I’m in a ditch w my guys depending on me to be ethical or throw sand in the face of our enemy, guess what. Sand wins every time. We get to go on to fight another day and I’m not feeling bad about not being “fair”. Would I take a $20 I see fall out of someone’s pocket? Of course not. But this is a competive sport you jack wagon.
Click to expand...

I already posted the NCAA rulebook. It says feigning injuries are unethical and against the notion of fair play. It is about 2 bullet points below maliciously trying to injure an opponent. Here's another one-

Taken from NCAA Rules Committee meeting 2011

"FEIGNING INJURIES There is considerable concern among committee members about reports of teams having their players fake injuries as a means of slowing down teams that play the game at a faster pace. The committee takes this opportunity to remind the coaching community that the faking of injuries is expressly forbidden under the Coaching Ethics section of The Football Code, paragraph 8 (page FR-13 of the 2009- 10 Rule Book)."


"Expressly forbidden". Definitely sounds legal. The issue is that it impossible to penalize during a game because refs arent mindreaders. A player could also intentionally eye gouge his opponent at the bottom of a pile so that he is seriously injured and has to leave the game. Ref can't see what happens so cant throw a flag and say it was intentional. No way the NCAA could penalize a player if he lied and said it was an accident. If that helps you win, are you ok with blinding an opponent if you can't get caught?

Maliciously injuring and feigning injury are in the same section of the rulebook. A ref CAN call an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on faked injuries (it is literally called unsportsmanlike in the rules). So it is absolutely against the rules but it is impossible to call during a game because refs arent medical professionals.

Lol @ comparing winning an amateur sports competition with survival on the battlefield. Only someone who never served a day in the military would make such a stupid comparison. Go back to playing Call of Duty and leave the warfighting to the professionals.
 
stormbrewing said:
Just to keep it in perspective, it’s FIU... we should have dominated and laughed at them. Instead we got dominated and we mad
Click to expand...
Yea you are right of course. I was keeping it in perspective of what he said and the fact that most if not all of those injuries were blatantly fake. It’s one thing to win but he doesn’t have to lie, just ignore the question and laugh like the trainers were.
 
TimeB0mb said:
I already posted the NCAA rulebook. It says feigning injuries are unethical and against the notion of fair play. It is about 2 bullet points below maliciously trying to injure an opponent. Here's another one-

Taken from NCAA Rules Committee meeting 2011

"FEIGNING INJURIES There is considerable concern among committee members about reports of teams having their players fake injuries as a means of slowing down teams that play the game at a faster pace. The committee takes this opportunity to remind the coaching community that the faking of injuries is expressly forbidden under the Coaching Ethics section of The Football Code, paragraph 8 (page FR-13 of the 2009- 10 Rule Book)."


"Expressly forbidden". Definitely sounds legal. The issue is that it impossible to penalize during a game because refs arent mindreaders. A player could also intentionally eye gouge his opponent at the bottom of a pile so that he is seriously injured and has to leave the game. Ref can't see what happens so cant throw a flag and say it was intentional. No way the NCAA could penalize a player if he lied and said it was an accident. If that helps you win, are you ok with blinding an opponent if you can't get caught?

Maliciously injuring and feigning injury are in the same section of the rulebook. A ref CAN call an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on faked injuries (it is literally called unsportsmanlike in the rules). So it is absolutely against the rules but it is impossible to call during a game because refs arent medical professionals.

Lol @ comparing winning an amateur sports competition with survival on the battlefield. Only someone who never served a day in the military would make such a stupid comparison. Go back to playing Call of Duty and leave the warfighting to the professionals.
Click to expand...

First of all you fcking desk jockey, I served nine years. So watch it.

Second, look at what I actually said you pathetic wannabe. I know you never served because no Marine would ever call themselves “ex marine” because there’s no such thing. Ask me how I know.

Third, that’s why it’s a grey area and I specifically indicated veering to the left or right of the actual rule.

Winners win. Losers lose. Go back to being a loser. That seems to be your obvious comfort zone.

Semper Fi, poser. Next time try to pretend being a soldier. Marines can spot the bull**** from 500 yards away on iron sights. But you wouldn’t know what the reference indicates.

You’re a wannabe boot. Go home.
 
Back
Top