Actually my first reply provided the only two options that would have occurred if the DB doesn’t intentionally interfere on the play. I made no assumptions of the outcome. Since you are conveniently, again, leaving out that I did state either A) he catches the ball and scores, the safety was not in play due to the angle he had and Marion speed or B) Marion drops a would be touchdown. I never assumed the outcome. The fact still remains you attempted to imply we got “lucky” with that penalty when in fact UM created and forced that penalty. At least be intellectually honest with what you attempted to do by blatantly leaving out the entirety of what transpired on that play to promote the idea of being “aided”.
And yes, for whatever the reasons of the staff, they chose to play it very conservative after going up 21-7, and simplistic play calling. Would I have preferred a slightly more aggressive approach? Absolutely, but it doesn’t matter.
This staff chose that route against this team under those conditions, they chose a route to have their players, go mano a mano straight up against a good ND team and trust the players would do what needed to be done to win. Whether we like to the totality of the performance, the staff trusted in it and it came through.
Instead of enjoying and seeing it thru that lense, no we have a bunch of the same group who want to be proven right about their opinion on the staff coming out as if we lost the game. It’s almost as if they are upset we won.
The “Yeah But” crew is in full effect