forums

Walk with me

Players have 5 year to play 5 right?

Just bring him in and let it play out on greentree. I like the idea of bringing in another LB if they're not 100% he is one at the moment.
 
HurricanesR1 said:
This thread wouldn't have been started if there weren't major questions about his potential at LB. Not good if we're already looking at other positions. Sounds like he's a great athlete but lacks abcxyz to play LB.
Click to expand...
Hard agree.

Impossible to read it as any other than "his film at linebacker is not that impressive, but he's a great athlete, so before everyone loses their minds, lets sell his potential at wide receiver".
 
MikeyCanez said:
HurricanesR1 said:
This thread wouldn't have been started if there weren't major questions about his potential at LB. Not good if we're already looking at other positions. Sounds like he's a great athlete but lacks abcxyz to play LB.
Click to expand...
Hard agree.

Impossible to read it as any other than "his film at linebacker is not that impressive, but he's a great athlete, so before everyone loses their minds, lets sell his potential at wide receiver".
Click to expand...
I think he looks more natural on offense than defense. Maybe I’m wrong (the sample is very limited) but nobody has really challenged that point. They just say we need linebackers more. That’s true, but that’s a separate question.

He’s still a take for me either way because the profile is so unique. Get him here and figure it out. There are flashes on defense. But we are bringing in other linebackers.
 
I walked with you for the first page, but now my watch is over. I've been screaming for LBs for 5 years....our LB room needs to look like our WR room.
 
….

IMG_3988.jpeg
 
DMoney said:
I think he looks more natural on offense than defense. Maybe I’m wrong (the sample is very limited) but nobody has really challenged that point. They just say we need linebackers more. That’s true, but that’s a separate question.

He’s still a take for me either way because the profile is so unique. Get him here and figure it out. There are flashes on defense. But we are bringing in other linebackers.
Click to expand...
He may be more athletic at receiver than linebacker sure. That doesn't scream to me that he should be a receiver. It screams he might not be miami caliber. Our wide receiver room will have: Toney, Moore, Upshaw, Wingo, Paris, Spafford, Jacobs, Sears, Wright, Lennear, Woodard, the 5 stars we bring in from 28 etc. How tf is this dude gonna play at receiver. Theres no way he picks up receiver in college and competes with that group unless he is a completely out of this world athlete.

Stick to backer or find a new school imo.
 
TwentySix said:
….

View attachment 377258
Click to expand...
after taking four receivers in ‘26, asking him to compete against them, the future ‘28 WRs, + upperclassmen, then lastly Wright, Sears, Woodard and Lennear is crazy talk lmao.

Hopefully the staff moves him in-line at TE.

Millibrook is where Cypher plays at, right? How did he look as he is the guy we’re looking to bring in (alongside Whiteside + Glover). Cypher’s highlights look great
 
cookies said:
Not worried about LBs in the ‘27 class because we got Whiteside flipping soon and likely Cypher too give Gaby’s suggestive comment. And i am glad they aren’t letting go of a great kid/character guy + an amazing athlete in Randle. We have a 2nd TE spot waiting for him right there so

after taking four receivers in ‘26, asking him to compete against them + upperclassmen & Wright, Sears, Woodard and Lennear is crazy talk lmao.

Hopefully the staff moves him in-line at TE.

Millibrook is where Cypher plays at, right? How did he look as he is the guy we’re looking to bring in (alongside Whiteside + Glover). Cypher’s highlights look great
Click to expand...
Honestly, that was a while back and the only person on Millbrook that really jumped off the screen was the receiver I mentioned lol, I wasn’t looking for specific guys on that side. But they had guys all over the place, they outmatched Garner from the jump.

I watched a few games after that (mentioned in another thread yesterday) and I just didn’t see it with Randle at linebacker. Everything looked a step behind processing wise. But I also may have been nitpicking/being too critical because I’m not generally watching full high school games for linebacker commits.

But he’s a legit freak show athlete. If you told me he came in and dedicated himself to receiver and was the best of the class I wouldn’t be completely shocked. Seriously.
 
DMoney said:
I think he looks more natural on offense than defense. Maybe I’m wrong (the sample is very limited) but nobody has really challenged that point. They just say we need linebackers more. That’s true, but that’s a separate question.

He’s still a take for me either way because the profile is so unique. Get him here and figure it out. There are flashes on defense. But we are bringing in other linebackers.
Click to expand...
He isn’t a take at WR, especially at the $ figure his ranking likely would necessitate. Do you see what we have loaded at WR and actively recruiting? The time and nil to develop him at WR could be spent on actual LBs
 
LA\^/ said:
Players have 5 year to play 5 right?

Just bring him in and let it play out on greentree. I like the idea of bringing in another LB if they're not 100% he is one at the moment.
Click to expand...
5yrs yes, but their is opportunity cost in a guy sitting for 2-3yrs before he plays if he is a highly rated player which necessitates a high $ figure typically.

We have a big need at LB. WR is possibly the lowest need on the entire roster TODAY. We don’t need another WR, period. Only guy we’d add to this class is Wright reclassifying. This dude maybe you could say TE. But if he can’t be a LB or would never get any burn there because we can’t seem to develop pure athletes at LB just move on and spend the money elsewhere
 
DMoney said:
When you recruit a true athlete, I believe you should be open minded.

People killed Golden for experimenting with Njoku at LB during his redshirt year, but it was a fine move. See what you have. Njoku ended up being a first round TE anyway, and a bunch of other position-switch guys went first round with him.
Click to expand...
Yeah and we never won 10 games with his sorry as
 
Calinative said:
He isn’t a take at WR, especially at the $ figure his ranking likely would necessitate. Do you see what we have loaded at WR and actively recruiting? The time and nil to develop him at WR could be spent on actual LBs
Click to expand...
He’s not being taken as a WR
 
TwentySix said:
Honestly, that was a while back and the only person on Millbrook that really jumped off the screen was the receiver I mentioned lol, I wasn’t looking for specific guys on that side. But they had guys all over the place, they outmatched Garner from the jump.

I watched a few games after that (mentioned in another thread yesterday) and I just didn’t see it with Randle at linebacker. Everything looked a step behind processing wise. But I also may have been nitpicking/being too critical because I’m not generally watching full high school games for linebacker commits.

But he’s a legit freak show athlete. If you told me he came in and dedicated himself to receiver and was the best of the class I wouldn’t be completely shocked. Seriously.
Click to expand...
Yeah I definitely want him apart of the class. All the recent actions would suggest our coaches are proceeding like he will be moved to offense, most likely as a WR.

I just feel like TE could be a better use of his abilities given our current roster makeup and his own talents. He might not have the physicality required for that position tho.

We need to substitute way more than we have ever done at WR and I just don’t see this situation ending well given what we’re bringing in at WR, and what we have already.

your assessment gives me sum optimism tho
 
Calinative said:
He isn’t a take at WR, especially at the $ figure his ranking likely would necessitate. Do you see what we have loaded at WR and actively recruiting? The time and nil to develop him at WR could be spent on actual LBs
Click to expand...
You take him as an athlete. Let Greentree decide where he fits.

His size/speed combo is rare and he has good character. If we want first rounders, we need to recruit first round profiles.
 
I still maintain Alec Ogletree. Elite ATH, but main concerns out of UGA were he didn’t really like to mix it up and get nasty. You can literally still look that up and see those on his scouting reports in 2014 (along w/ some character stuff which is why he dropped a bit). I think he turned out okay and they are **** near identical in size/stature at same stage. He was also an insane track athlete in HS but didn’t participate in hurdles at 6’3 214.

@DMoney I understand where you are coming from though. He is a piece of clay, just get him here and figure out the rest later. You think he should be labeled an ATH, I see no issue there (although I believe he will be a **** good LB). I thought you were trying to foreshadow a drop initially, glad you cleaned that up.
 
Last edited:
cookies said:
TwentySix said:
….

View attachment 377258
Click to expand...
after taking four receivers in ‘26, asking him to compete against them, the future ‘28 WRs, + upperclassmen, then lastly Wright, Sears, Woodard and Lennear is crazy talk lmao.

Hopefully the staff moves him in-line at TE.

Millibrook is where Cypher plays at, right? How did he look as he is the guy we’re looking to bring in (alongside Whiteside + Glover). Cypher’s highlights look great
Click to expand...
I might be able to get hudl tape of Millbrook versus Garner.

I saw he didn’t have much for the stat book against them and they are the only real team they’ve played.

This next one will be a showdown. Hobbs is a good RB at Clayton. 6-1, game speed, 10 yards per rush. Good program.
 
Back
Top