- Joined
- Jul 24, 2012
- Messages
- 19,519
x2Idc either I'm just saying maybe that's his mindset.
What I can tell you about this is that look at the history of schools that brought 3 RBs in at once and see how things broke down from there. One of the biggest differences now as opposed to when we had a stable is because there were upperclassmen and everyone knew you work your tail off and wait for your opportunity. Our depth chart is very young once Duke is removed and for a RB there are only so many reps someone will get left out. Funny thing is he is the only one that has let it be known about not being cool with it but trust me he isn't the only one thinking that. RBs are now a dime a dozen and these kids know that and that's why it's important to get on the field and show what you can do early.
He has never said the staff lied to him and he has had many conversations with the staff about this and is choosing to see how the staff handles the situation. He committed to a situation that fit him best and just so happens to be his favorite but what many people fail to realize is this is a business decision and you have to take the emotion out of the decision and think logically. Sometimes you have to take off the orange and green sunglasses.
TOKEN
I've watched Cronkrite's film if he wants to decommit bye!
I think he's an average running back with average speed. His vision and balance are average. Also physically he looks maxed out. I might be speculating, but I fee like out of the 3 Williams/Walton ------ then Cronkrite.
But you're closer to the situation. So I will just end it with this. If he's not cool with it then decommit sooner rather than later.
I totally disagree
Ranking Cronk 3rd behind Williams and Walton is a lot different than the rest of the criticism. If he is as average as the poster claims, then he should be a distant 3rd behind Williams and Walton and many don't see it that way.
But then again maybe the bed in the Holiday Inn Express was really comfortable last night for our internet recruiting experts.
Last edited: