The Work 6-30

The Work 6-30

Peter Ariz
Peter Ariz

Comments (91)

Weak if true...

I doubt this is true. This does not sound like the mentality of a competitor. Everywhere he goes there are going to be stud RB's in front and behind him.... There are NO guarantees. If he likes MIami, then he should pull for them.... Done deal!!

Well the poster who put it up said he isn't afraid of competition, but it's about trusting the coaches. Personally I have my feelings on this but if a kid feels lied to, the kid feels lied to. Doesn't matter what we think.

Why would he feel like he's being lied to? There were no guarantee that Walton would reclassify. I dont think he would leave because of that.

I don't know maybe because these are 17 year olds and not posted on a message board? Staff told him a certain number. Then the actual number might be different. That in the eyes of some is a lie. Not me personally. But some.

Everyone has an opinion. The 17 year olds who came here and won 5 nat'l championships probably had a different mindset. It didn't matter what the depth chart looked like.
 
I doubt this is true. This does not sound like the mentality of a competitor. Everywhere he goes there are going to be stud RB's in front and behind him.... There are NO guarantees. If he likes MIami, then he should pull for them.... Done deal!!

Well the poster who put it up said he isn't afraid of competition, but it's about trusting the coaches. Personally I have my feelings on this but if a kid feels lied to, the kid feels lied to. Doesn't matter what we think.

Why would he feel like he's being lied to? There were no guarantee that Walton would reclassify. I dont think he would leave because of that.

I don't know maybe because these are 17 year olds and not posted on a message board? Staff told him a certain number. Then the actual number might be different. That in the eyes of some is a lie. Not me personally. But some.

Everyone has an opinion. The 17 year olds who came here and won 5 nat'l championships probably had a different mindset. It didn't matter what the depth chart looked like.

I think he gets the mindset part but he's saying maybe that's how Cronkite feels. Maybe he feels like if the coaches would have said their maybe three running backs in this class rather then we are only taking two he could have takin time to think about his decision alil longer instead of feeling like he better hop on board before he was left out. When your 17yrs old and have the choice to go to a program who produces heisman contending RBs every year over your fav team your loyalty might come into question to. But you will never get that chance so try and look from another perspective for a change. It's not 1980 anymore man
 
Well the poster who put it up said he isn't afraid of competition, but it's about trusting the coaches. Personally I have my feelings on this but if a kid feels lied to, the kid feels lied to. Doesn't matter what we think.

Why would he feel like he's being lied to? There were no guarantee that Walton would reclassify. I dont think he would leave because of that.

I don't know maybe because these are 17 year olds and not posted on a message board? Staff told him a certain number. Then the actual number might be different. That in the eyes of some is a lie. Not me personally. But some.

Everyone has an opinion. The 17 year olds who came here and won 5 nat'l championships probably had a different mindset. It didn't matter what the depth chart looked like.

I think he gets the mindset part but he's saying maybe that's how Cronkite feels. Maybe he feels like if the coaches would have said their maybe three running backs in this class rather then we are only taking two he could have takin time to think about his decision alil longer instead of feeling like he better hop on board before he was left out. When your 17yrs old and have the choice to go to a program who produces heisman contending RBs every year over your fav team your loyalty might come into question to. But you will never get that chance so try and look from another perspective for a change. It's not 1980 anymore man

1. Fam, I don't know if Cronkrite really has a problem with the staff's RB recruitment or not. Seems like a solid kid so I highly doubt it.

2. I was referring to Cronkrite's mindset not the poster's. I know it's not the 80s but I wish every RB recruit had the same mindset as Duke Johnson during his recruitment. Do you think it would've mattered to Duke if the staff changed the number of RB recruits?

3. My main point is this is the U! 5 national championships, the top producer of NFL running backs, period. There is no other program like it in college football. Get in and build it back up.
 
Why would he feel like he's being lied to? There were no guarantee that Walton would reclassify. I dont think he would leave because of that.

I don't know maybe because these are 17 year olds and not posted on a message board? Staff told him a certain number. Then the actual number might be different. That in the eyes of some is a lie. Not me personally. But some.

Everyone has an opinion. The 17 year olds who came here and won 5 nat'l championships probably had a different mindset. It didn't matter what the depth chart looked like.

I think he gets the mindset part but he's saying maybe that's how Cronkite feels. Maybe he feels like if the coaches would have said their maybe three running backs in this class rather then we are only taking two he could have takin time to think about his decision alil longer instead of feeling like he better hop on board before he was left out. When your 17yrs old and have the choice to go to a program who produces heisman contending RBs every year over your fav team your loyalty might come into question to. But you will never get that chance so try and look from another perspective for a change. It's not 1980 anymore man

1. Fam, I don't know if Cronkrite really has a problem with the staff's RB recruitment or not. Seems like a solid kid so I highly doubt it.

2. I was referring to Cronkrite's mindset not the poster's. I know it's not the 80s but I wish every RB recruit had the same mindset as Duke Johnson during his recruitment. Do you think it would've mattered to Duke if the staff changed the number of RB recruits?

3. My main point is this is the U! 5 national championships, the top producer of NFL running backs, period. There is no other program like it in college football. Get in and build it back up.

Idc either I'm just saying maybe that's his mindset.
 
I don't know maybe because these are 17 year olds and not posted on a message board? Staff told him a certain number. Then the actual number might be different. That in the eyes of some is a lie. Not me personally. But some.

Everyone has an opinion. The 17 year olds who came here and won 5 nat'l championships probably had a different mindset. It didn't matter what the depth chart looked like.

I think he gets the mindset part but he's saying maybe that's how Cronkite feels. Maybe he feels like if the coaches would have said their maybe three running backs in this class rather then we are only taking two he could have takin time to think about his decision alil longer instead of feeling like he better hop on board before he was left out. When your 17yrs old and have the choice to go to a program who produces heisman contending RBs every year over your fav team your loyalty might come into question to. But you will never get that chance so try and look from another perspective for a change. It's not 1980 anymore man

1. Fam, I don't know if Cronkrite really has a problem with the staff's RB recruitment or not. Seems like a solid kid so I highly doubt it.

2. I was referring to Cronkrite's mindset not the poster's. I know it's not the 80s but I wish every RB recruit had the same mindset as Duke Johnson during his recruitment. Do you think it would've mattered to Duke if the staff changed the number of RB recruits?

3. My main point is this is the U! 5 national championships, the top producer of NFL running backs, period. There is no other program like it in college football. Get in and build it back up.

Idc either I'm just saying maybe that's his mindset.

What I can tell you about this is that look at the history of schools that brought 3 RBs in at once and see how things broke down from there. One of the biggest differences now as opposed to when we had a stable is because there were upperclassmen and everyone knew you work your tail off and wait for your opportunity. Our depth chart is very young once Duke is removed and for a RB there are only so many reps someone will get left out. Funny thing is he is the only one that has let it be known about not being cool with it but trust me he isn't the only one thinking that. RBs are now a dime a dozen and these kids know that and that's why it's important to get on the field and show what you can do early.

He has never said the staff lied to him and he has had many conversations with the staff about this and is choosing to see how the staff handles the situation. He committed to a situation that fit him best and just so happens to be his favorite but what many people fail to realize is this is a business decision and you have to take the emotion out of the decision and think logically. Sometimes you have to take off the orange and green sunglasses.
 
Advertisement
Logically, if he's confident in his abilities, it doesn't matter what the 'situation' is. Either you bust your **** and earn PT, or you get passed up by someone else who does. That's the same 'situation' at Miami, Alabama, and Savannah State. The best 'business decision' for a RB is to go somewhere that isn't going to run you into the ground or get you hurt. The longer you stay in the League, the more you get paid.
 
Everyone gets so caught up on numbers, SMH. You can have 4 "RB's" come in one class and one ends up on defense, another doesn't make grades, another is used as a FB/HB, and another flunks out, and you have zero. Its called recruiting a deep team.
 
Everyone gets so caught up on numbers, SMH. You can have 4 "RB's" come in one class and one ends up on defense, another doesn't make grades, another is used as a FB/HB, and another flunks out, and you have zero. Its called recruiting a deep team.
Exactly...... How many 4 or 5star running backs do UGA or Alabama have? Why people think miami can't do the same is beyond me......
Remember we had Portis, Mcgahee, and gore in the backfield at the same time.....
 
Everyone gets so caught up on numbers, SMH. You can have 4 "RB's" come in one class and one ends up on defense, another doesn't make grades, another is used as a FB/HB, and another flunks out, and you have zero. Its called recruiting a deep team.
Exactly...... How many 4 or 5star running backs do UGA or Alabama have? Why people think miami can't do the same is beyond me......
Remember we had Portis, Mcgahee, and gore in the backfield at the same time.....

Did all three come in the same class?
 
Advertisement
Straight up...although I think Cronkrite is a stud RB, I think He's an even better DB...a 4 or 5* DB if He committed to it.
 
Everyone gets so caught up on numbers, SMH. You can have 4 "RB's" come in one class and one ends up on defense, another doesn't make grades, another is used as a FB/HB, and another flunks out, and you have zero. Its called recruiting a deep team.
Exactly...... How many 4 or 5star running backs do UGA or Alabama have? Why people think miami can't do the same is beyond me......
Remember we had Portis, Mcgahee, and gore in the backfield at the same time.....

we obviously dunno what these kids are thinking, but IMO if I'm an elite RB & I have legitimate thoughts about making it to the NFL, why wouldnt I wanna go to a program that has a couple other other stud RBs on it. You're better suited saving your body and splitting carries, than being the main back for 3 years. You by no means have to be a workhorse RB to make it in the league, as we've seen the evolution of offenses.
 
Everyone has an opinion. The 17 year olds who came here and won 5 nat'l championships probably had a different mindset. It didn't matter what the depth chart looked like.

I think he gets the mindset part but he's saying maybe that's how Cronkite feels. Maybe he feels like if the coaches would have said their maybe three running backs in this class rather then we are only taking two he could have takin time to think about his decision alil longer instead of feeling like he better hop on board before he was left out. When your 17yrs old and have the choice to go to a program who produces heisman contending RBs every year over your fav team your loyalty might come into question to. But you will never get that chance so try and look from another perspective for a change. It's not 1980 anymore man

1. Fam, I don't know if Cronkrite really has a problem with the staff's RB recruitment or not. Seems like a solid kid so I highly doubt it.

2. I was referring to Cronkrite's mindset not the poster's. I know it's not the 80s but I wish every RB recruit had the same mindset as Duke Johnson during his recruitment. Do you think it would've mattered to Duke if the staff changed the number of RB recruits?

3. My main point is this is the U! 5 national championships, the top producer of NFL running backs, period. There is no other program like it in college football. Get in and build it back up.

Idc either I'm just saying maybe that's his mindset.

What I can tell you about this is that look at the history of schools that brought 3 RBs in at once and see how things broke down from there. One of the biggest differences now as opposed to when we had a stable is because there were upperclassmen and everyone knew you work your tail off and wait for your opportunity. Our depth chart is very young once Duke is removed and for a RB there are only so many reps someone will get left out. Funny thing is he is the only one that has let it be known about not being cool with it but trust me he isn't the only one thinking that. RBs are now a dime a dozen and these kids know that and that's why it's important to get on the field and show what you can do early.

He has never said the staff lied to him and he has had many conversations with the staff about this and is choosing to see how the staff handles the situation. He committed to a situation that fit him best and just so happens to be his favorite but what many people fail to realize is this is a business decision and you have to take the emotion out of the decision and think logically. Sometimes you have to take off the orange and green sunglasses.

I assume the answer is no, but do you have any idea if Cronkrite has put any consideration into possibly playing safety in college? He's certainly athletic enough to pull it off and has a few plays in his highlights that jump out from his time playing on the defensive side of the ball.

As you mentioned, RBs are considered a dime a dozen now whereas safety is becoming more of a premium position in the league (as evidenced by contracts signed by Earl Thomas and Jairus Byrd, among others, this offseason). I recall Charles Perry saying in an interview a while back that he wants to play LB instead of RB in college in part because they generally have longer playing careers and are the ones inflicting the punishment rather than taking it.

I'm not asking this with orange and green glasses, hoping that he'd flip to defense and allow us to keep all of our stud RBs (including Cronk). I'm just curious regardless of where he ends up playing in college.
 
Advertisement
I think he gets the mindset part but he's saying maybe that's how Cronkite feels. Maybe he feels like if the coaches would have said their maybe three running backs in this class rather then we are only taking two he could have takin time to think about his decision alil longer instead of feeling like he better hop on board before he was left out. When your 17yrs old and have the choice to go to a program who produces heisman contending RBs every year over your fav team your loyalty might come into question to. But you will never get that chance so try and look from another perspective for a change. It's not 1980 anymore man

1. Fam, I don't know if Cronkrite really has a problem with the staff's RB recruitment or not. Seems like a solid kid so I highly doubt it.

2. I was referring to Cronkrite's mindset not the poster's. I know it's not the 80s but I wish every RB recruit had the same mindset as Duke Johnson during his recruitment. Do you think it would've mattered to Duke if the staff changed the number of RB recruits?

3. My main point is this is the U! 5 national championships, the top producer of NFL running backs, period. There is no other program like it in college football. Get in and build it back up.

Idc either I'm just saying maybe that's his mindset.

What I can tell you about this is that look at the history of schools that brought 3 RBs in at once and see how things broke down from there. One of the biggest differences now as opposed to when we had a stable is because there were upperclassmen and everyone knew you work your tail off and wait for your opportunity. Our depth chart is very young once Duke is removed and for a RB there are only so many reps someone will get left out. Funny thing is he is the only one that has let it be known about not being cool with it but trust me he isn't the only one thinking that. RBs are now a dime a dozen and these kids know that and that's why it's important to get on the field and show what you can do early.

He has never said the staff lied to him and he has had many conversations with the staff about this and is choosing to see how the staff handles the situation. He committed to a situation that fit him best and just so happens to be his favorite but what many people fail to realize is this is a business decision and you have to take the emotion out of the decision and think logically. Sometimes you have to take off the orange and green sunglasses.

I assume the answer is no, but do you have any idea if Cronkrite has put any consideration into possibly playing safety in college? He's certainly athletic enough to pull it off and has a few plays in his highlights that jump out from his time playing on the defensive side of the ball.

As you mentioned, RBs are considered a dime a dozen now whereas safety is becoming more of a premium position in the league (as evidenced by contracts signed by Earl Thomas and Jairus Byrd, among others, this offseason). I recall Charles Perry saying in an interview a while back that he wants to play LB instead of RB in college in part because they generally have longer playing careers and are the ones inflicting the punishment rather than taking it.

I'm not asking this with orange and green glasses, hoping that he'd flip to defense and allow us to keep all of our stud RBs (including Cronk). I'm just curious regardless of where he ends up playing in college.

He has no intentions of playing safety at UM and the staff has no intentions of him playing anywhere but in the offensive backfield. What you mention about is one reason why some schools like UM at one point and others were unsure which side of the ball he would end up on. I have a feeling that this season everyone will see what he can really do when he is featured a little more. Remember he only had 87 carries as a junior as opposed to most top RBs are getting 150+ touches in a season.
 
1. Fam, I don't know if Cronkrite really has a problem with the staff's RB recruitment or not. Seems like a solid kid so I highly doubt it.

2. I was referring to Cronkrite's mindset not the poster's. I know it's not the 80s but I wish every RB recruit had the same mindset as Duke Johnson during his recruitment. Do you think it would've mattered to Duke if the staff changed the number of RB recruits?

3. My main point is this is the U! 5 national championships, the top producer of NFL running backs, period. There is no other program like it in college football. Get in and build it back up.

Idc either I'm just saying maybe that's his mindset.

What I can tell you about this is that look at the history of schools that brought 3 RBs in at once and see how things broke down from there. One of the biggest differences now as opposed to when we had a stable is because there were upperclassmen and everyone knew you work your tail off and wait for your opportunity. Our depth chart is very young once Duke is removed and for a RB there are only so many reps someone will get left out. Funny thing is he is the only one that has let it be known about not being cool with it but trust me he isn't the only one thinking that. RBs are now a dime a dozen and these kids know that and that's why it's important to get on the field and show what you can do early.

He has never said the staff lied to him and he has had many conversations with the staff about this and is choosing to see how the staff handles the situation. He committed to a situation that fit him best and just so happens to be his favorite but what many people fail to realize is this is a business decision and you have to take the emotion out of the decision and think logically. Sometimes you have to take off the orange and green sunglasses.

I assume the answer is no, but do you have any idea if Cronkrite has put any consideration into possibly playing safety in college? He's certainly athletic enough to pull it off and has a few plays in his highlights that jump out from his time playing on the defensive side of the ball.

As you mentioned, RBs are considered a dime a dozen now whereas safety is becoming more of a premium position in the league (as evidenced by contracts signed by Earl Thomas and Jairus Byrd, among others, this offseason). I recall Charles Perry saying in an interview a while back that he wants to play LB instead of RB in college in part because they generally have longer playing careers and are the ones inflicting the punishment rather than taking it.

I'm not asking this with orange and green glasses, hoping that he'd flip to defense and allow us to keep all of our stud RBs (including Cronk). I'm just curious regardless of where he ends up playing in college.

He has no intentions of playing safety at UM and the staff has no intentions of him playing anywhere but in the offensive backfield. What you mention about is one reason why some schools like UM at one point and others were unsure which side of the ball he would end up on. I have a feeling that this season everyone will see what he can really do when he is featured a little more. Remember he only had 87 carries as a junior as opposed to most top RBs are getting 150+ touches in a season.

Thanks for the response, Token.

I asked because I was curious if he ever had similar thoughts as Perry in regards to playing RB vs. defense at the next level. I remember mentioning Cronkrite's carries in another thread a while ago when discussing his underrated upside as an RB. I'm completely sold on him as a talent.
 
Taking 3 backs is a very smart move if possible. LSU has three RB committed for this years class after signing Fournette and Darrel Williams last year cycle. Need I mention Alabama taking Tenpenny, Kamara, Tyren Jones and Derrick Henry in 2013. You recruit to gain symmetry and have back ups that have the same talent as your starter and experience. The running back position takes a pounding and if you don't have a stable your offense is usually hurting.

Duke will be a junior this year and the only back that has his kind of talent is Yearby. Right now the depth goes Duke, Gus, and most likely Yearby as your backs. One gets injured and you either are going to have 2 studs or 1 stud and 1 good back. Skip to 2015, it would be nice to have 3 backs with experience and play the best out of the 3 incoming backs. If Duke were to leave, you would have 2 backs with experience and have 3 talented freshman compete for that 3rd spot and redshirt the other 2 knowing they are going to see the field their sophomore year.
 
Advertisement
Everyone gets so caught up on numbers, SMH. You can have 4 "RB's" come in one class and one ends up on defense, another doesn't make grades, another is used as a FB/HB, and another flunks out, and you have zero. Its called recruiting a deep team.
Exactly...... How many 4 or 5star running backs do UGA or Alabama have? Why people think miami can't do the same is beyond me......
Remember we had Portis, Mcgahee, and gore in the backfield at the same time.....

Did all three come in the same class?

Nope Portis in 99, McGahee 2000, Gore 2001
 
Everyone has an opinion. The 17 year olds who came here and won 5 nat'l championships probably had a different mindset. It didn't matter what the depth chart looked like.

I think he gets the mindset part but he's saying maybe that's how Cronkite feels. Maybe he feels like if the coaches would have said their maybe three running backs in this class rather then we are only taking two he could have takin time to think about his decision alil longer instead of feeling like he better hop on board before he was left out. When your 17yrs old and have the choice to go to a program who produces heisman contending RBs every year over your fav team your loyalty might come into question to. But you will never get that chance so try and look from another perspective for a change. It's not 1980 anymore man

1. Fam, I don't know if Cronkrite really has a problem with the staff's RB recruitment or not. Seems like a solid kid so I highly doubt it.

2. I was referring to Cronkrite's mindset not the poster's. I know it's not the 80s but I wish every RB recruit had the same mindset as Duke Johnson during his recruitment. Do you think it would've mattered to Duke if the staff changed the number of RB recruits?

3. My main point is this is the U! 5 national championships, the top producer of NFL running backs, period. There is no other program like it in college football. Get in and build it back up.

Idc either I'm just saying maybe that's his mindset.

What I can tell you about this is that look at the history of schools that brought 3 RBs in at once and see how things broke down from there. One of the biggest differences now as opposed to when we had a stable is because there were upperclassmen and everyone knew you work your tail off and wait for your opportunity. Our depth chart is very young once Duke is removed and for a RB there are only so many reps someone will get left out. Funny thing is he is the only one that has let it be known about not being cool with it but trust me he isn't the only one thinking that. RBs are now a dime a dozen and these kids know that and that's why it's important to get on the field and show what you can do early.

He has never said the staff lied to him and he has had many conversations with the staff about this and is choosing to see how the staff handles the situation. He committed to a situation that fit him best and just so happens to be his favorite but what many people fail to realize is this is a business decision and you have to take the emotion out of the decision and think logically. Sometimes you have to take off the orange and green sunglasses.


TOKEN
I've watched Cronkrite's film if he wants to decommit bye!

I think he's an average running back with average speed. His vision and balance are average. Also physically he looks maxed out. I might be speculating, but I fee like out of the 3 Williams/Walton ------ then Cronkrite.

But you're closer to the situation. So I will just end it with this. If he's not cool with it then decommit sooner rather than later.
 
I think he gets the mindset part but he's saying maybe that's how Cronkite feels. Maybe he feels like if the coaches would have said their maybe three running backs in this class rather then we are only taking two he could have takin time to think about his decision alil longer instead of feeling like he better hop on board before he was left out. When your 17yrs old and have the choice to go to a program who produces heisman contending RBs every year over your fav team your loyalty might come into question to. But you will never get that chance so try and look from another perspective for a change. It's not 1980 anymore man

1. Fam, I don't know if Cronkrite really has a problem with the staff's RB recruitment or not. Seems like a solid kid so I highly doubt it.

2. I was referring to Cronkrite's mindset not the poster's. I know it's not the 80s but I wish every RB recruit had the same mindset as Duke Johnson during his recruitment. Do you think it would've mattered to Duke if the staff changed the number of RB recruits?

3. My main point is this is the U! 5 national championships, the top producer of NFL running backs, period. There is no other program like it in college football. Get in and build it back up.

Idc either I'm just saying maybe that's his mindset.

What I can tell you about this is that look at the history of schools that brought 3 RBs in at once and see how things broke down from there. One of the biggest differences now as opposed to when we had a stable is because there were upperclassmen and everyone knew you work your tail off and wait for your opportunity. Our depth chart is very young once Duke is removed and for a RB there are only so many reps someone will get left out. Funny thing is he is the only one that has let it be known about not being cool with it but trust me he isn't the only one thinking that. RBs are now a dime a dozen and these kids know that and that's why it's important to get on the field and show what you can do early.

He has never said the staff lied to him and he has had many conversations with the staff about this and is choosing to see how the staff handles the situation. He committed to a situation that fit him best and just so happens to be his favorite but what many people fail to realize is this is a business decision and you have to take the emotion out of the decision and think logically. Sometimes you have to take off the orange and green sunglasses.


TOKEN
I've watched Cronkrite's film if he wants to decommit bye!

I think he's an average running back with average speed. His vision and balance are average. Also physically he looks maxed out. I might be speculating, but I fee like out of the 3 Williams/Walton ------ then Cronkrite.

But you're closer to the situation. So I will just end it with this. If he's not cool with it then decommit sooner rather than later.

I totally disagree
 
1. Fam, I don't know if Cronkrite really has a problem with the staff's RB recruitment or not. Seems like a solid kid so I highly doubt it.

2. I was referring to Cronkrite's mindset not the poster's. I know it's not the 80s but I wish every RB recruit had the same mindset as Duke Johnson during his recruitment. Do you think it would've mattered to Duke if the staff changed the number of RB recruits?

3. My main point is this is the U! 5 national championships, the top producer of NFL running backs, period. There is no other program like it in college football. Get in and build it back up.

Idc either I'm just saying maybe that's his mindset.

What I can tell you about this is that look at the history of schools that brought 3 RBs in at once and see how things broke down from there. One of the biggest differences now as opposed to when we had a stable is because there were upperclassmen and everyone knew you work your tail off and wait for your opportunity. Our depth chart is very young once Duke is removed and for a RB there are only so many reps someone will get left out. Funny thing is he is the only one that has let it be known about not being cool with it but trust me he isn't the only one thinking that. RBs are now a dime a dozen and these kids know that and that's why it's important to get on the field and show what you can do early.

He has never said the staff lied to him and he has had many conversations with the staff about this and is choosing to see how the staff handles the situation. He committed to a situation that fit him best and just so happens to be his favorite but what many people fail to realize is this is a business decision and you have to take the emotion out of the decision and think logically. Sometimes you have to take off the orange and green sunglasses.


TOKEN
I've watched Cronkrite's film if he wants to decommit bye!

I think he's an average running back with average speed. His vision and balance are average. Also physically he looks maxed out. I might be speculating, but I fee like out of the 3 Williams/Walton ------ then Cronkrite.

But you're closer to the situation. So I will just end it with this. If he's not cool with it then decommit sooner rather than later.

I totally disagree
x2
 
Back
Top