No, but you created parameters where you could exclude certain candidates and ONLY include your candidates. Nobody gives a **** if a guy has coached at the NFL level, the list of "only good in the NFL or only good in college" FAR EXCEEDS guys who have succeeded as coaches in BOTH the NFL and college.
Bill O'Brien - TWO years as a college head coach. Memorable quote: "I'm not a one-and-done guy. I made a commitment to these players at Penn State and that's what I am going to do. I'm not gonna cut and run after one year, that's for sure." Oh, so he stayed for TWO years, thus he is a man of his word. But, sure, sure, he's a 1-year (3-GAME) product of the Nick Saban Reform School for Coaches, so we should definitely take him...
Lane Kiffin - 5-15 (in 1.25 years) as an NFL head coach. This is where you really give away how ridiculous your "qualifications" are, and how desperate you are for "criteria" which include Kiffin and exclude Mario. What a joke.
Greg Schiano - I'm not against Schiano, he has actually coached for Miami, so he'd know what he's getting into. But he is a Jersey guy, and Rutgers (now) is in the Big 10, not the Big East. No reason for him to move. Culturally, he has found his dream job (again).
Matt Rhule - yeah, a guy who is 2-0 in the NFL is a HIIIIIIGHLY likely candidate. If you're HIIIIIIGH.
Matt Campbell - the first decent and possible name that you've mentioned.
Luke Fickell - the guy has never coached in the NFL.
So you propose some ridiculous criteria and then float a bunch of names, only one of which qualifies and would even consider the job. And FOR THIS you think that we should not "rush" into hiring Mario, but should instead conduct some sort of exhaustive "search" of candidates who would be uninterested in the job?
Hilarious. We have the most REALISTIC fans...