THE COMMITTEE HATES US!!!!

Jaromir Jagr is taking victory laps but we might just switch again after this weekend when the committee put South Carolina at #24 . To pad Clemson's record? Maybe. But its quite possible for that to happen after we play a Pitt team already with a losing record and Clemson beats an 8-3 South Carolina.
 
Advertisement
this nlgga got a foreign hockey player name on a college football board, his opinion is irrelevant
 
They do hate us. Kirby Papercutt should have been saying how close it is between all of the top 5. Not just UM and Clump.

We have a beef with Bama and Okie has a beef with Clump being a head of them. Wisky has a beef with everyone.
 
I think it had more to do with Syracuse officially hitting 'losing record' status in a blow-out fashion. That loss is getting worse and worse for Clemson.

Clemson is the only Top 25 team that has a loss to a team with a losing record. That'll change after this weekend, but certainly is not a good look.
 
The original argument, when the first CFP poll came out was that just us winning would not be enough. We would need things to happen, beyond our control. the fact that we were undefeated and ranked 10th was the proof. That's what the idiots are not getting. Nobody, NOBODY, ever said that Miami would not rise or not make it to the top 4. We said that just us winning, all by itself, would not be enough. And the proof to that was that the committee ranked us 10th, behind six 1 loss teams even though all we had done all season was win our games. Now you're acting like us being ranked 2nd is some kind of vindication, when in fact it is just more proof that the committee ****ed up the first rankings and had us WAY undervalued at 10.

We didn't pass Ohio State and Penn State because they played each other. We passed Ohio State because they got the **** beat out of them by unranked Iowa. That was **** beyond our control. We passed Penn State when they **** the bed against #24 , 2 loss, Michigan State. **** beyond our control. USC didn't put the Pac12 out of the playoff hunt, 3 loss Stanford did that when they guaranteed a 2 loss Pac12 champion by upsetting Washington. More **** beyond our control. We didn't pass UGA or Alabama because they played each other, as you suggested would be the case. We passed UGA when Auburn beat the dog **** out of them.

My argument, from the very beginning, has been that we needed things to happen like those laid out above. Miami winning games had absolutely zero to do with those things. Us winning can only possibly account for us passing Wisconsin and Oklahoma. It's very hard to argue that us passing Clemson had anything to do with us escaping Virginia after trailing 28-14 in the 3rd, while Clemson won their game 61-3.

Your argument was that it was inevitable and that we controlled our own destiny. We controlled zero ******* percent of the results listed above. I never argued that it couldn't or wouldn't. I simply argued that it was out of our hands. Clemson passed us in the AP poll during their bye week when we beat the team that had just beaten them the week before. They should never been ranked ahead of us. Oklahoma lost to an unranked team. They should have never been ahead of us. TCU failed to score a TD against that same team. They should have never been ranked ahead of us. Wisconsin's marquee win was against a team that Duke, the 13th best team in the ACC blew out. They should have never been ranked ahead of us. Ohio State got blew out at home. They should have never been ranked ahead of us. Penn State lost to Ohio State and had zero quality wins. They should have never been ranked ahead of us.

Your proposition that the committee having us at 10, behind 6 teams that had already lost was not a direct slap in the face is as absurd today as it was then. We should have never been ranked lower than 4th in the CFP rankings. We were one of only three undefeated P5 teams, and the only 1 loss team that didn't have a "bad loss" was Notre Dame. Miami didn't prove that they belonged ahead of these teams by winning games. Those teams proved they didn't belong by losing games that they weren't supposed to. And we only had control in one of those games. That does not vindicate you. It vindicates me.
 
I also think NC State losing to Wake diminished what was another quality win for Clemson.....Committee does seem like they are paying some attention.
 
Advertisement
The original argument, when the first CFP poll came out was that just us winning would not be enough. We would need things to happen, beyond our control. the fact that we were undefeated and ranked 10th was the proof. That's what the idiots are not getting. Nobody, NOBODY, ever said that Miami would not rise or not make it to the top 4. We said that just us winning, all by itself, would not be enough. And the proof to that was that the committee ranked us 10th, behind six 1 loss teams even though all we had done all season was win our games. Now you're acting like us being ranked 2nd is some kind of vindication, when in fact it is just more proof that the committee ****ed up the first rankings and had us WAY undervalued at 10.

We didn't pass Ohio State and Penn State because they played each other. We passed Ohio State because they got the **** beat out of them by unranked Iowa. That was **** beyond our control. We passed Penn State when they **** the bed against #24 , 2 loss, Michigan State. **** beyond our control. USC didn't put the Pac12 out of the playoff hunt, 3 loss Stanford did that when they guaranteed a 2 loss Pac12 champion by upsetting Washington. More **** beyond our control. We didn't pass UGA or Alabama because they played each other, as you suggested would be the case. We passed UGA when Auburn beat the dog **** out of them.

My argument, from the very beginning, has been that we needed things to happen like those laid out above. Miami winning games had absolutely zero to do with those things. Us winning can only possibly account for us passing Wisconsin and Oklahoma. It's very hard to argue that us passing Clemson had anything to do with us escaping Virginia after trailing 28-14 in the 3rd, while Clemson won their game 61-3.

Your argument was that it was inevitable and that we controlled our own destiny. We controlled zero ******* percent of the results listed above. I never argued that it couldn't or wouldn't. I simply argued that it was out of our hands. Clemson passed us in the AP poll during their bye week when we beat the team that had just beaten them the week before. They should never been ranked ahead of us. Oklahoma lost to an unranked team. They should have never been ahead of us. TCU failed to score a TD against that same team. They should have never been ranked ahead of us. Wisconsin's marquee win was against a team that Duke, the 13th best team in the ACC blew out. They should have never been ranked ahead of us. Ohio State got blew out at home. They should have never been ranked ahead of us. Penn State lost to Ohio State and had zero quality wins. They should have never been ranked ahead of us.

Your proposition that the committee having us at 10, behind 6 teams that had already lost was not a direct slap in the face is as absurd today as it was then. We should have never been ranked lower than 4th in the CFP rankings. We were one of only three undefeated P5 teams, and the only 1 loss team that didn't have a "bad loss" was Notre Dame. Miami didn't prove that they belonged ahead of these teams by winning games. Those teams proved they didn't belong by losing games that they weren't supposed to. And we only had control in one of those games. That does not vindicate you. It vindicates me.
Jesus Christ..... Take the L.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
I also think NC State losing to Wake diminished what was another quality win for Clemson.....Committee does seem like they are paying some attention.

They must have missed Virginia Tech losing to Georgia tech, then.

But that affected both of us.......as we both played them. So what is your point?

Simply that Virginia Tech went from a quality win against a Top 15 team to just a win over a very average team who is now unranked. The Ga Tech win was always just a win over a very average team who will likely end the season with a losing record. Ga Tech must beat UGA to get to .500 and become bowl eligible. That might actually make our win over Ga Tech look pretty decent, but not their win over Virginia Tech.
 
I also think NC State losing to Wake diminished what was another quality win for Clemson.....Committee does seem like they are paying some attention.

They must have missed Virginia Tech losing to Georgia tech, then.

But that affected both of us.......as we both played them. So what is your point?

Simply that Virginia Tech went from a quality win against a Top 15 team to just a win over a very average team who is now unranked. The Ga Tech win was always just a win over a very average team who will likely end the season with a losing record. Ga Tech must beat UGA to get to .500 and become bowl eligible. That might actually make our win over Ga Tech look pretty decent, but not their win over Virginia Tech.

OK...but in strictly heads up rankings between Miami & Clemson it is irrelevant since both Miami and Clemson played both VT and GT this year.
 
The original argument, when the first CFP poll came out was that just us winning would not be enough. We would need things to happen, beyond our control. the fact that we were undefeated and ranked 10th was the proof. That's what the idiots are not getting. Nobody, NOBODY, ever said that Miami would not rise or not make it to the top 4. We said that just us winning, all by itself, would not be enough. And the proof to that was that the committee ranked us 10th, behind six 1 loss teams even though all we had done all season was win our games. Now you're acting like us being ranked 2nd is some kind of vindication, when in fact it is just more proof that the committee ****ed up the first rankings and had us WAY undervalued at 10.

We didn't pass Ohio State and Penn State because they played each other. We passed Ohio State because they got the **** beat out of them by unranked Iowa. That was **** beyond our control. We passed Penn State when they **** the bed against #24 , 2 loss, Michigan State. **** beyond our control. USC didn't put the Pac12 out of the playoff hunt, 3 loss Stanford did that when they guaranteed a 2 loss Pac12 champion by upsetting Washington. More **** beyond our control. We didn't pass UGA or Alabama because they played each other, as you suggested would be the case. We passed UGA when Auburn beat the dog **** out of them.

My argument, from the very beginning, has been that we needed things to happen like those laid out above. Miami winning games had absolutely zero to do with those things. Us winning can only possibly account for us passing Wisconsin and Oklahoma. It's very hard to argue that us passing Clemson had anything to do with us escaping Virginia after trailing 28-14 in the 3rd, while Clemson won their game 61-3.

Your argument was that it was inevitable and that we controlled our own destiny. We controlled zero ****ing percent of the results listed above. I never argued that it couldn't or wouldn't. I simply argued that it was out of our hands. Clemson passed us in the AP poll during their bye week when we beat the team that had just beaten them the week before. They should never been ranked ahead of us. Oklahoma lost to an unranked team. They should have never been ahead of us. TCU failed to score a TD against that same team. They should have never been ranked ahead of us. Wisconsin's marquee win was against a team that Duke, the 13th best team in the ACC blew out. They should have never been ranked ahead of us. Ohio State got blew out at home. They should have never been ranked ahead of us. Penn State lost to Ohio State and had zero quality wins. They should have never been ranked ahead of us.

Your proposition that the committee having us at 10, behind 6 teams that had already lost was not a direct slap in the face is as absurd today as it was then. We should have never been ranked lower than 4th in the CFP rankings. We were one of only three undefeated P5 teams, and the only 1 loss team that didn't have a "bad loss" was Notre Dame. Miami didn't prove that they belonged ahead of these teams by winning games. Those teams proved they didn't belong by losing games that they weren't supposed to. And we only had control in one of those games. That does not vindicate you. It vindicates me.
Jesus Christ..... Take the L.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

No. Not because you say so without anything to support your opinion, and certainly not because everything that I said would have to happen in order for us to move up did happen, us winning AND teams ahead of us losing. We did not pass UGA, Ohio State, and Penn State because we won. We passed them because they lost. They lost games they were favored in and expected to win.
 
I also think NC State losing to Wake diminished what was another quality win for Clemson.....Committee does seem like they are paying some attention.

They must have missed Virginia Tech losing to Georgia tech, then.

But that affected both of us.......as we both played them. So what is your point?

Simply that Virginia Tech went from a quality win against a Top 15 team to just a win over a very average team who is now unranked. The Ga Tech win was always just a win over a very average team who will likely end the season with a losing record. Ga Tech must beat UGA to get to .500 and become bowl eligible. That might actually make our win over Ga Tech look pretty decent, but not their win over Virginia Tech.

OK...but in strictly heads up rankings between Miami & Clemson it is irrelevant since both Miami and Clemson played both VT and GT this year.

Syracuse
 
Advertisement

You can always tell who the loser is in any argument when their argument reduces to the idea that the other person is mad/triggered. I have very much enjoyed clubbing you over the head repeatedly, and the fact that you're so stupid that you still don't understand it, brings me further joy.
 
Back
Top