- Joined
- Jul 24, 2012
- Messages
- 24,158
U know what’s interesting about those who say half full or half empty? Both r right & wrong at the same time; the only answer that is right, is the tangible aspect of that view…that water is in the glass. I don’t care if some thinks it’s half full & others thinks it’s half empty. The only thing I see is water is in the glass; that’s undeniable.
So saying last yr’s team underperformed is undeniable, but I can also say that’s not a glass half full statement. The fact is, pick a year from 2003 (a team that produced the most 1st round picks in a single draft) - present, & find me a Miami team that hasn’t underperformed. U can literally say that about every single team for 20 yrs based upon personnel.
TVD was healthy for the first 6 games, & we were 3-3, including 1-3 against P5 schools. Could it possibly be the reason we’ve been underperforming for the past 20 yrs is b/c that grind, zeal, want has waned? I’m all for kids having a break, but it’s a difference when a program has been established at the heights of dominance, semblance, a winning culture vs. trying to get there. Like I’m not sure why JJ was brought up when we were thee team in the 80’s the culture was well established.
Imo, I would’ve liked for our players to fall back to get extra rep, work time, & study to push for that next level.
Agreed that nuance and context are important.
Water? Glass half empty? Half full?
At this point, half the board is on their 3rd pitcher of Kool aid, topping off the glass before it empties saying 8 wins at Miami is good…
The other half is 14 ****tails in and threw the glass off the wall trying to hit the MTSU players dominating us and now drinking straight from the bottle…