Watching the Jax-Bolt game. Commenting on Hurns, the announcer expresses amazement that he went undrafted. Later, the announcer praises Perryman as a closer and hard hitter with great leverage who will succeed Butler as one of San Diego's ILBs. The article that was posted to this thread is interesting, but it underestimates how poorly the team was coached under Folden. Chickillo and Hurns are flourishing in the NFL, but barely received attention while at UM. Perryman should have been a 1st rounder; many NFL teams needed ILBs to help stop the run, but UMs horrible defense devalued players like Perryman. Walford will be the next great UM TE in the NFL. UM floundered because of Folden and his two sidekick coordinators. Yes, the team lacks size, speed and nastiness on the OL and DL, but whose fault is that? Isn't it the job of the coaching staff to recruit top linemen? As the article says, with a good OL, even slightly above average RBs will look great, and Duke certainly was better than slightly above average. It is clear that Folden and his crew were in above their heads. They had no plan, no scheme, no football smarts. Perhaps, Folden's dream was to recreate his years at Penn State. Maybe, that is why he kept his fat Nittany buddy around as DC. Enough. It has all been said already. Just don't tell me that coaching was not the prime reason for the team's failure in the last 5 years.