NC_Canes_11
Heisman Winner
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2017
- Messages
- 27,329
You just not have a great memory. Mario is the guy who gets blown out by UtahSo you want Mario to act like the guy who gets blown out by Utah. Got it.
You just not have a great memory. Mario is the guy who gets blown out by UtahSo you want Mario to act like the guy who gets blown out by Utah. Got it.
I mean he took over a worse program and has already won more at it than Mario has here."Dillingham isn't a good coach but I wish our guy would do what he does."
CIS in 2025.
Not this year's Utah. But you go off on that tangent.You just not have a great memory. Mario is the guy who gets blown out by Utah
I mean he took over a worse program and has already won more at it than Mario has here.
No, I think you're talking about the bang-8 or the skinny post he ran for 12 yards and the 7-yard out route. They were in zone coverage, but even if you add those up, that's 19 yards for the whole game. Minus the two drag routes they kept running all night, even when OJ wasn't even on him. The other four targets were pass breaks with no chance of catching the ball.Need to watch it again, but believe Bell had a receptfggggggg or two along the sideline. Bell was too physical for him.
Need to watch it again, but believe Bell had a reception or two along the sideline. Bell was too physical for him.
Need to watch it again, but believe Bell had a reception or two along the sideline. Bell was too physical for him.
1 run play out of 6-7 different set where RB looks for a crease between G and C. If it's not there just put your face mask into the Guards numbers........ That running schemeJordan Lyle is bouncing around and struggling to fit the run scheme.
What run scheme?
Take your word, but hopefully can find time to rewatch.No, I think you're talking about the bang-8 or the skinny post he ran for 12 yards and the 7-yard out route. They were in zone coverage, but even if you add those up, that's 19 yards for the whole game. Minus the two drag routes they kept running all night, even when OJ wasn't even on him. The other four targets were pass breaks with no chance of catching the ball.
Cause our run scheme was made by a 1st grader with a crayonSMH.
If we're trying to be ground and pound, how do we end up with so many passing yards?
I never said he was good or bad. But if you want to know, I think he’s a pretty good coach. He’s done very well at a worse program with less talent and less money than Mario has here. And as a 1st time HC no less. It’s a results oriented business. He’s gotten good results.So you do think he is a good coach. Make up your mind. But about those two losses, one being by 32 points......
This isn’t the own you think it is. Losing on the road to a decent Utah team when your starting QB doesn’t play is criminal, is that right?Not this year's Utah. But you go off on that tangent.
So no real answer. I figured as much.Cause our run scheme was made by a 1st grader with a crayon
But his press conference quotes. Those are the real separators.I never said he was good or bad. But if you want to know, I think he’s a pretty good coach. He’s done very well at a worse program with less talent and less money than Mario has here. And as a 1st time HC no less. It’s a results oriented business. He’s gotten good results.
This isn’t the own you think it is. Losing on the road to a decent Utah team when your starting QB doesn’t play is criminal, is that right?
What do you think would happen to Miami if Beck couldn’t play? 90% of teams would look god awful if their starting QB was out.
If you get out of work at 5pm, depending where you work, it can take you 1-2.5 hours to get to the stadium in rush hour by adding the extra stadium traffic for a 7pm game.***** move by the by the owner of this site to bring up the fans
If we make the playoff but not the ACC chip, would you consider this season a failure ?No, actually call out Mario, Mirabal, etc. like you do the players consistently and in depth, but you won't.
You stating "Mario's Oregon teams routinely dropped these games, and this was his fifth loss as a double-digit favorite", doesn't come close to calling him out for what those results truly mean.
No mention that the 5 (6), is the worse in the country during his time here. No mention that it is completely unacceptable period, let alone for someone allocated the resources he had both at OU and now UM. No mention that he is clearly a coach who does less with more and any team he leads, regardless of talent acquisition, will always be at a disadvantange against any staff who is simply better than him when it comes to Xs and Os.
This is year 4. We are unlikely heading to the ACCCG. And this when both FSU and Clemsom are dumspter fires. UNC, VILLE, SMU have already been there since Mario has arrived. It's likely GT and UVA go this year, yet we don't, again. That is pitiful.
The ROI to this point has been poor. He was not provided the resources he was, to likely not even make the ACCG after 4 years, forget mentioning even winning it.
Our fans refuse to see all angles. Im not blaming the fans for the loss. The team came out flat and we got blatantly outcoached.I know his name is poison on this board, and some of it for good reason, but Bud Elliott does make some good points at times. One reason for some pessimism on Miami in general is exactly what D mentioned. These middle of the road ACC home games, we get zero juice from the building. No, it’s not an excuse why we lost. And it’s literally never going to get any better, we just have to deal with it. But he (and he’s not the only one by any means) has pointed out that the home crowd atmosphere critique is two-fold. People say we have no home field advantage. That’s patently false. For the big games, it’s absolutely an advantage. ND and UiF were absolutely advantageous situations.
But for these ACC games, the building is largely dead, most notably at the start. Many, many other teams in the P4 (just about all of them, to be fair) get energy from the home crowds every single time out. To be blunt, we don’t. Elliott has pointed that out as a reason that we’ve traditionally struggled in these spots. We can all roll our eyes, and part of me does. At the end of the day, it’s your job to coach and play well, whether there’s 8 or 80,000 in the building. You’re literally paid to do it these days. But to completely ignore it as a factor is disingenuous at this point. It’s beyond a trend.
I’m sure this post will get negged, and that’s fine. It’s NOT the reason we lost. And again, this is probably pointless, because we’re never going to just make the place Nebraska or Death Valley for “******” ACC teams. There’s no solution, frankly. But I do think it contributes to the performance in some way. I wish there was some way to change it, but it’s never going to happen. We just have to find ways to win in the 1-2 times a year when we do come out flat (EVERY team does it), because we’re not going to get carried by the building in these underwhelming on-paper matchups.
1 run play out of 6-7 different set where RB looks for a crease between G and C. If it's not there just put your face mask into the Guards numbers........ That running scheme