forums

Some thoughts on the Louisville loss

View as article
252cane said:
Guys naturally grow once they start eating and lifting. Don’t think it’s anything the staff is telling them to do
Click to expand...
well didnt bain come out and say specifically that he put on too much weight and he dropped a ton this year?

idk what we did to lofton but he lost all his athleticism
 
Advertisement
harphong said:
THIS. This is what I mean when I say the blueprint is out. I am not emoting and throwing away the season after 1 loss to an "inferior" team.

We have a pattern of storming out the gate , then stagnating, and then regressing as the season wears on.

Multitude of reasons conjoing everytime - tendencies mapped, stubborness, lack of discipline, injuries, lack of depth, morale, etc..

Many other teams get better as the year goes on; I have yet to see Miami do that in a lonnnnng time... MAYBE only example I can straight face that is 2016 with bard kayak.
Click to expand...
yup. the back half of the 16 year was the only time.

if we brought back that same roster in 17, my guess is we likely compete for a title with that defense we had.
 
hoops156 said:
well didnt bain come out and say specifically that he put on too much weight and he dropped a ton this year?

idk what we did to lofton but he lost all his athleticism
Click to expand...
Prime example. Don’t think they told bain to add weight but he just naturally did from working out. He was up to like 285 last year
 
Calinative said:
are you saying long speed or short speed? IDGAF about long speed out of a RB. I care about acceleration/burst.
Click to expand...
Long speed I have no idea. Lyle ran a 11.29 100m in HS, which isn't fast. Henry Parrish ran a 11.09.

Lyle's HS highlights looked like he had decent speed, but nothing special. I don't remember anyone touting him as a speed back (I could be wrong).

But he hits a 91 yd run against South Florida and that all changes. Mark Walton ran a 4.6 but looked faster on his 80 yd App St + 82 yd Toledo runs - IMO a similar thing is happening with Lyle.

Here's his Freshman year highlights. If someone can point a run where he looks fast/special speed besides the South Florida run, please point it out, because I don't see it.

Not slow - just not "fast".

 
Calinative said:
Okay, so you just have zero clue what a competent run game looks like then. Just impossible for you to think the Run Scheme isn't the #1 most glaring issue of the entire team for the remainder of this season. We are at defcon 1 with this run scheme. You keep making excuses for it. You keep failing to say that the run scheme/bs identity is what's making the rest of the offensive issues worse. LITERALLY I said this to you pre-season that this run scheme eliminates explosive runs and makes it so any penalty is crippling and drive-killling. Now we've seen it for like three different 4th quarters/second halves and the entirety of this louisville game.

THIS RUN SCHEME IS ******* GARBAGE, and if we lose another game it'll be the fault AGAIN.
Click to expand...
I need you to cook.
 
StoneWallLoungeCane said:
Like I said. I got banned for posting this
Click to expand...
Good lord, no you didn't. Most Maude’s think Mario’s a corch. You’re Tony Perps. You post troll ****. You have for years and you know it. Sometimes your posts catch infractions and yeah, without much leeway because you’re a known quantity.

You got an infraction in May, in July and in October. It was two different Maude’s involved in those. That adds up to 3 points and an auto-ban.

I haven’t asked but my guess is most Maude’s don’t want you here because of the trolling for years and have resisted flat out banning you in all candor. They don’t care that you criticized Mario on a October 22, 2025 lol
 
RVACane said:
Good lord, no you didn't. Most Maude’s think Mario’s a corch. You’re Tony Perps. You post troll ****. You have for years and you know it. Sometimes your posts catch infractions and yeah, without much leeway because you’re a known quantity.

You got an infraction in May, in July and in October. It was two different Maude’s involved in those. That adds up to 3 points and an auto-ban.

I haven’t asked but my guess is most Maude’s don’t want you here because of the trolling for years and have resisted flat out banning you in all candor. They don’t care that you criticized Mario on a October 22, 2025 lol
Click to expand...


Lmao. Please explain why I received an “infraction” other than accurately posting about Cristobal?
 
StoneWallLoungeCane said:
Lmao. Please explain why I received an “infraction” other than accurately posting about Cristobal?
Click to expand...
Lmao. It looks like a Maude got you for bumping or trolling. I see trolling notes in two of your infractions and the third looks like there was insults. The Maude’s don’t like you dude. They see you as a troublemaking WEZ troll and think you should be long gone. I don’t know what to tell you but that’s my read on it. You’re not a topic of conversation that I’m aware of though there’s been comments from time to time. And no I don’t care and I’m not involved in this situation but it wasn’t because you called Mario a corch. He sucks.
 
Advertisement
RVACane said:
Good lord, no you didn't. Most Maude’s think Mario’s a corch. You’re Tony Perps. You post troll ****. You have for years and you know it. Sometimes your posts catch infractions and yeah, without much leeway because you’re a known quantity.

You got an infraction in May, in July and in October. It was two different Maude’s involved in those. That adds up to 3 points and an auto-ban.

I haven’t asked but my guess is most Maude’s don’t want you here because of the trolling for years and have resisted flat out banning you in all candor. They don’t care that you criticized Mario on a October 22, 2025 lol
Click to expand...

RVACane said:
Lmao. It looks like a Maude got you for bumping or trolling. I see trolling notes in two of your infractions and the third looks like there was insults. The Maude’s don’t like you dude. They see you as a troublemaking WEZ troll and think you should be long gone. I don’t know what to tell you but that’s my read on it. You’re not a topic of conversation that I’m aware of though there’s been comments from time to time. And no I don’t care and I’m not involved in this situation but it wasn’t because you called Mario a corch. He sucks.
Click to expand...

Lol. The cristobal cops think any criticism of Cristobal is “trolling.”
 
StoneWallLoungeCane said:
Then they should stop banning me for making accurate comments about Cristobal.
Click to expand...
You have a posting history here. For years. People can look at it and decide for themselves. You are welcome to believe that Maude’s who don’t like St. CoRchibal banned you for criticizing said coRch 🤣
 
RVACane said:
You have a posting history here. For years. People can look at it and decide for themselves. You are welcome to believe that Maude’s who don’t like St. CoRchibal banned you for criticizing said coRch 🤣
Click to expand...

So I was given an “infraction” for no reason other than the mods (why do you keep using the possessive?) don’t like me? Got it.
 
StoneWallLoungeCane said:
So I was given an “infraction” for no reason other than the mods (why do you keep using the possessive?) don’t like me? Got it.
Click to expand...
They don’t like you because of your trolling history and so when you post things, if it looks like trolling it gets scrutinized and no mercy to put it bluntly. It’s like being a taliban from afghanland and trying to cross the border now. They’re getting scrutinized and less leeway.

As to the possessive use of Maude’s unfortunately that’s in my autocorrect now and I don’t know how to stop it. I do not type that apostrophe.

Personally, it was nice catching up with you. I am going to go now and call out the St. CoRchibal loyalists..
 
Advertisement
StoneWallLoungeCane said:
Like I said. I got banned for posting this
Click to expand...

I have tried explaining this proposition to ******** many times. A person can be correct AND still be an *******. Such a person does not get infractions because of their view. Such a person gets infractions because they're an ******* about it.
 
Back
Top