the23Watcher
Sophomore
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2015
- Messages
- 1,548
if an assistant coach and leave and get a job within the same conference, kids should be able to as well.
It either needs to be a policy for every school or a policy for no school.
Either every school can restrict transfers to teams on their schedule or none can.
It makes no sense (to me at least) that its on a school by school, athletic department by athletic department, coach by coach basis.
And you bet it'll be used in negative recruiting.
If the policy was that everyone could do it, or conversely, that nobody could do it, there's an even playing field and the negative recruiting factor is moot.
Further, I HATE that this is happening just days before National Signing Day.
And I'm trying not to be a tinfoil hat about the timing of this.
I really am.
His ****in High School tweeted how disappointed he was in Miami like he was lowkey trying to say "you won't be getting any more of our great genius players!"
Article in ESPN says we blocked him from all ACC schools and any team on our schedule next season. Kinda surprising as I thought CMR typically allowed them to go wherever.
Plenty of great MBA programs in the country that are not in the ACC.
Absolutely we shoukd block him to teams on our schedule. Teams would sign him just to get inside info. He did nothing for this program. He can still transfer to old dominion
Bilas is right though.And just like clockwork, Ol' Ghey Bilas has to chime in:
[TWEET]959657976826081286[/TWEET]
Absolutely we shoukd block him to teams on our schedule. Teams would sign him just to get inside info. He did nothing for this program. He can still transfer to old dominion
Outside of practice and one three play he wasn't given much of a chance to show what he could do
Minor league move on part of the school. Let him transfer where he wants. I am sure Mark Richt would let him.
May not make it in time for Evan, but a change is coming.
https://sports.cbsimg.net/images/collegefootball/NCAA-Transfer-Bylaws-Reform-Proposal.pdf
Baylor law professor Jeremy Counsellor and Iowa State molecular pharmacology professor Tim Day — the NCAA faculty athletics representatives for their school have drafted a proposal that may make the Big 12 the first conference to emancipate student-athletes.
...While this proposal would create a far more student-athlete-friendly transfer system than the present one, it eschews a system in which all student-athletes are eligible for competition immediately after transfer. Data clearly indicate that, in broad strokes, transfer has negative educational implications – both on likelihood of graduation and time to degree. A plan that includes immediate eligibility for all transferring student-athletes creates an environment in which transfers will dramatically increase, and such a plan predictably will have an overall negative impact on graduation and time to degree.
This proposal forces recognition of the increased time-to-degree by adding a year to the clock of transferring student-athletes who are not eligible for competition immediately, which creates an additional year of educational opportunity for the transferring student-athlete, and places the responsibility for providing that additional educational time on the receiving institution.
In addition, the proposal ensures that student-athletes do not lose a year of competition due to transfer. By adding one year to their clock, transferring student-athletes will have the same number of years of competition remaining at the second institution following a year-in-residence as they did at the original institution at the time of transfer.
A student-athlete may transfer without the permission of the original institution and be immediately eligible for aid and practice. A student-athlete who transfers is not eligible for competition for the academic year following transfer, unless:
1. the student-athlete earned a baccalaureate degree at the original institution;
2. the student-athlete’s head coach at the original institution resigned or was fired during or after the most recent season of competition, except that the student-athlete is not immediately eligible at another institution at which the head coach is employed;
3. sanctions have been imposed on the original institution that limit post-season competition in the student-athlete’s sport;
4. the student-athlete did not receive athletically-related financial aid at the original institution; or
5. an exception in bylaw 14.5.5.2 or 14.5.6 is satisfied.
A first-time transfer who is not immediately eligible for competition receives a one-year extension to the five-year clock if it is necessary to ensure that the student-athlete does not lose a year of competition due to transfer.
• This plan is genuinely significant transfer reform that relocates all control of transfer decisions to student-athletes. This plan removes all authority on transfer decisions from the original institution.
• Student-athletes may transfer to the institution of their choice, and they never need the permission of the original institution to transfer.
• All student-athletes are immediately eligible for aid and practice after transfer.
• Student-athletes may transfer once without losing a season of competition.
• Student-athletes who transfer after a head coaching change or the imposition of a limit on post-season competition are eligible immediately.
• Student-athletes who are walk-ons or graduates are eligible immediately after transfer.
• Student-athletes who transfer may continue to take advantage of other existing exceptions to the year in residence requirement.
And just like clockwork, Ol' Ghey Bilas has to chime in:
[TWEET]959657976826081286[/TWEET]
And just like clockwork, Ol' Ghey Bilas has to chime in:
[TWEET]959657976826081286[/TWEET]
Smh. Did Bilas say anything when Coach K wouldn’t let Chase Jeter (last year) or Jordan Tucker (this year) transfer within the ACC?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
same teacher as Berrios screwed him out of the 4.0. Did not read, but how can UM block a grad transfer?
go try out for FIU or FAU....
Yes, Bilas has been very critical of Duke on this very issue. (QB last year)And just like clockwork, Ol' Ghey Bilas has to chime in:
[TWEET]959657976826081286[/TWEET]
Smh. Did Bilas say anything when Coach K wouldn’t let Chase Jeter (last year) or Jordan Tucker (this year) transfer within the ACC?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, Bilas has been very critical of Duke on this very issue. (QB last year)And just like clockwork, Ol' Ghey Bilas has to chime in:
[TWEET]959657976826081286[/TWEET]
Smh. Did Bilas say anything when Coach K wouldn’t let Chase Jeter (last year) or Jordan Tucker (this year) transfer within the ACC?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk