Mark Little
Band
- Joined
- May 16, 2018
- Messages
- 873
And Rosier had no Njoku, No Richards, and No Walton.
He had Richards and Walton.
When you have to lie it just proves how weak your position is.
And Rosier had no Njoku, No Richards, and No Walton.
Try reading it junior.
I read it.
It just doesn't make any sense given what the topic is.
Who was #1? Wyoming with Josh Allen. They must’ve been undefeated.
Spending hours pouring over every game is not worth proving you wrong.
You are insanely bad at this.
Lol it does, it just goes against your agenda.
Good luck proving that.
Terrific counter point. Well articulated, would read again.
I already did by providing the statistic.
Football is a team sport. I'm not defending Kayya but wins and losses don't tell the whole story. Trent Dilfer was not a better QB than Dan Marino because he was on a stacked Ravens team that won a Super Bowl. That said.. Kayya is still dog****.Shameful.
What you said has nothing to do with, well, anything.
We had one of the best defenses in the country at takeaways and TFLs and our QB was so bad that he could hardly take advantage of their dominance.
Somehow you think Wyoming is relevant to that point.
That it’s better to be leading after the second half than the first. I thought that was obvious, but apparently I have overestimated the board once again.Which isn't in dispute.
So, your point is?
Better than losing to CincinnatiAcknowledged and I raise you a playing terribly against Pitt with a 10-0 team and a #2 ranking.
Wyoming was better at takeaways and had one of the best QB’s in the country. If you can’t understand the relevance to this argument then I cannot help you.
That it’s better to be leading after the second half than the first. I thought that was obvious, but apparently I have overestimated the board once again.
Better than losing to Cincinnati
Wyoming is in a G5 conference and Kyle Allen is vastly overrated.
Otherwise, it still has nothing to do with us.
I know that you desperately want to change the subject but this is pathetic.
You dispute it every time you insist that a QB who stated 38 games but never once led a 4th quarter comeback is better than a guy who’s done it 6 times just by saying “well with Kaaya we wouldn’t have been trailing.”It is obvious hence why nobody ever disputed it.
Again, you saying absolutely nothing.
You dispute it every time you insist that a QB who stated 38 games but never once led a 4th quarter comeback is better than a guy who’s done it 6 times just by saying “well with Kaaya we wouldn’t have been trailing.”
What about the games we were trailing in? How’d that happen, and how did they turn out?