Thank u for elaborating & providing your reasoning; I appreciate it. U definitely make some strong pts & a case for Pat being an all-time great.
Yes, I agree that longevity & the amount of talent surrounding a player should be taken into consideration when determining his greatness, but do u think they are more important than the height of his peak & accolades? My pt is that peak & accolades should carry the most weight, and if they are comparable between 2 players, then longevity can serve as the tiebreaker.
I agree with the criteria you've outlined here. The reason why I would place Revis above Pat, is that Revis's peak during the Revis island yrs is greater than what Pat was able to reach at any pt during his career. Revis in 09' put forth arguably the greatest season ever for a CB in history, & was without question robbed of a DPOY award, even though I'm a Charles Woodson fan. In this season, he was the sole reason why the Jets fielded the no.1 overall Defense, and made it to the AFC championship with Mark Sanchez @ QB. He accomplished the following:
View attachment 322828
View attachment 322829
Revis also has more all-pro selections & a SB win on his resume, despite playing 3 less yrs because 1 was cut short due to injury. Also, the longevity argument is tricky because Pat was found guilty & served a suspension for using PEDs & a masking agent in 19'; which raises questions about whether he was using them at other pts in his career.
The NFL unveiled its latest team of the decade on Monday.
www.nbcsports.com
As for who's more fundamentally sound: in my humble opinion I would say it's probably a wash.
Both are fundamentally sound CBs who excel in playing press-man coverage, & throughout their careers have routinely taken the assignment of guarding the opposing team's no.1 WR.