The lunacy of denial.
Charlie gets no credit for his Louisville days because he had all those Florida kids and he played a weak conference.
Charlie gets no credit for a couple good seasons at Louisville for the same reason Al Folden no longer gets credit for his work at Temple. Both guys got their shot at the big time and both flopped badly.
What's so hard to understand about that? Why do you super smart guys always try to complicate simple stuff?
Why are you looking to go way back in time to a Group of 5 program to use as a model when you have a much better (Power 5 marquee program) and much more recent model to use? I'd rather use Texas, which is a P5 program like UM, and is happening RIGHT NOW than Louisville, which was a big fish in a tiny Big East pond, as my example of what Charlie Wrong would do at another marquee P5 program.
I can show you how Charlie's impact at Texas has killed recruiting, but that wont matter either. Its very clear to see what has happened to Texas when you look at their recruiting rankings over the last 5 years and you also compare how popular and successful neighboring programs have also become in that same time period. It takes a 100% biased mind to not see facts like that that 100% contribute to the success of the program. His Louisville teams would have killed that Texas team.
Comparing what Charlie did to Louisville to what Al did at Temple is proof that your in denial.
The bottom fell out of Louisville before Charlie got there and he took it to a BCS bowl and he won. Golden did nothing.
Show me another turnaround like that.
Also Charlie was part of 2 NC with Florida and there is no doubt when he is recruiting in Florida he can put one of the best defenses on the country on the field. One that's good enough to win championships with. That's already been proven.
Also ignoring what he has done to Florida recruiting and developing players for the NFL is proof that your in denial.
I get it you don't like Charlie but to be blind to all these facts just proves your biased. A biased mind sees what it wants, thats a fact of human nature and when you ignore everything good and look at a few bad things then your biased and no longer looking at things rationally.
I cant change irrational minds but I can point out the flaws.