Point of concern.

Cane Dynasty is the guy who picks up Marcell Ozuna when he goes 2-for-4 on opening day. Because percentage.


Ummmmmmm yeah..........so like I was saying

Percentage. 2/4 = .500

Ummmmmmm yeah..........so like I was saying

Our long snapper is smaller than your btich...that schit matters

How stupid is your group of friends that you think your insults are clever and/or effective?
 
Advertisement
Cane Dynasty is the guy who picks up Marcell Ozuna when he goes 2-for-4 on opening day. Because percentage.


Ummmmmmm yeah..........so like I was saying

Percentage. 2/4 = .500

Ummmmmmm yeah..........so like I was saying

Our long snapper is smaller than your btich...that schit matters

How stupid is your group of friends that you think your insults are clever and/or effective?

Are you trying to reply to my statement by indicating that it is ineffective?
 
Ummmmmmm yeah..........so like I was saying

Percentage. 2/4 = .500

Ummmmmmm yeah..........so like I was saying

Our long snapper is smaller than your btich...that schit matters

How stupid is your group of friends that you think your insults are clever and/or effective?

Are you trying to reply to my statement by indicating that it is ineffective?

Quality sub-thread.
 
Michael Badgley tied @88th of 97 cfbstats.com - 2016 National Player Leaders

And has one blocked.....the one that was blocked was a 24 yarder......that's basically extra point range....that causes concern

I take the size of the sample....just like your urologist does

Our closest margin of victory is 14 points. Kid has not had a pressure kick yet. You can take that two ways: 1) his has not missed a pressure kick yet, or 2) he has one made one yet. I am more concerned with the fact that we have not play good in snow yet this year.


logic my friend....please my friend

We are on the verge of being back. Enjoying the moment is what matters. Fun, my friend, fun.

Fair enough. But reality will bite us like it tends to my friend

Maybe, maybe not.
 
I'm not sure how this is bad. Considering we average around 40 points a game it's a good that every time we get to the red zone were putting up 6 and the XP
 
Can't tell how serious this is but he started out bad, 0/2 but hes been 100% since. 33 yarder against FA&M barely missed, then 24 yarder blocked. He was also struggling with kickoffs. He hit a 27 yarder in the second half of FAU then nailed a 44 yarder at Appy State. Also, the past two games he has had 12 touchbacks on 14 kickoffs. I'm fine with just scoring more TDs.
 
Advertisement
This is the only unit that scares me....aside from whererra8's unit which is a monster.

I haven't seen Pete Unibrow's unit yet so I will reserve judgement on that particular issue
 
Why isn't the LS's size a problem on extra points or punts? Or are we using a different LS for those operations?

Yes my friend...protections are different based upon field position. Same snapper....different protections.

But it surely hurts when the snapper can't hold his lane

Explain to me the difference between his responsibilities on FGs and extra points.


As I am sure you already know my friend those things are sometimes dictatered (I love that word) by the opponent's tendencies .

I would have to break down multiple (I hate that word) opposing ST units and I am not willing to go through that torture at this juncture.
 
All this talk of Richt being better than al. If that's true why are we so far behind last year's fg pace? It was a thing of beauty watching last year's offense drive inside the 20 then kick the ball down the other teams gullet.

You're a real ******* genius aren't ya?
 
Advertisement
26/26 on PAT's. Hard to do any better than that.

tom-cruise-laughing-hysterically_48.gif
 
I agree. It's very concerning that through 4 games we've only had to kick 4 field goals.

I agree. It's troubling that this year the offense has been selfish by scoring TDs in the red zone and not giving him a chance for a few chip shot field goals.

2/4

I don't think the issue is the "total amount of FG's".

Ever heard of the word 'percentage'?

Sigh... I'll bite.

A percentage is, essentially, a number representation of a relationship generally based upon a 100% scale. In this case, it is a 100% scale.

The complaint was that Badgley has made 2/4 FGs, i.e., 50% of the FGs attempted.

Nevertheless, the complaint is based upon the assumption that these stats are indicative of future performance and disregarding any prior performances or skills. Essentially treat this season as a vacuum, which is inherently a problem because Badgley will not simply forget how to kick.

In addition, a sampling size of 4 is simply ridiculous to base any legitimate percentage upon.

Now, if we were to take all of his FGs attempted at the college level compared to FGs made at the college level, there is a very different story brewing.

In his career, Badgley has attempted 52 FGs and made 41 of them. That is a relation of 41/52; or a "percentage" of 78.85. That is to say that for every 10 attempts, Badgley is likely to make 7 of them, and has a very good chance to make 8 of them.

Therefore, if he already has 2 misses out of the way, I'm less concerned with his current FGm/FGa stat, and more concerned with how our Offense is scoring TDs instead of having to settle for field goals...

You'll bite?


Bite my schit hole you idiot
 
I agree. It's troubling that this year the offense has been selfish by scoring TDs in the red zone and not giving him a chance for a few chip shot field goals.

2/4

I don't think the issue is the "total amount of FG's".

Ever heard of the word 'percentage'?

Sigh... I'll bite.

A percentage is, essentially, a number representation of a relationship generally based upon a 100% scale. In this case, it is a 100% scale.

The complaint was that Badgley has made 2/4 FGs, i.e., 50% of the FGs attempted.

Nevertheless, the complaint is based upon the assumption that these stats are indicative of future performance and disregarding any prior performances or skills. Essentially treat this season as a vacuum, which is inherently a problem because Badgley will not simply forget how to kick.

In addition, a sampling size of 4 is simply ridiculous to base any legitimate percentage upon.

Now, if we were to take all of his FGs attempted at the college level compared to FGs made at the college level, there is a very different story brewing.

In his career, Badgley has attempted 52 FGs and made 41 of them. That is a relation of 41/52; or a "percentage" of 78.85. That is to say that for every 10 attempts, Badgley is likely to make 7 of them, and has a very good chance to make 8 of them.

Therefore, if he already has 2 misses out of the way, I'm less concerned with his current FGm/FGa stat, and more concerned with how our Offense is scoring TDs instead of having to settle for field goals...

Did you see the blocked kick? Care to extrapolate in depth as you already have?

Okay, well what happened with the blocked kick was as follows:

(1) Miami snapped the ball to the place holder.
(2) the place holder set the ball down
(3) after (1) but while (2) was happening, there was a battle between our Offensive Line and FAU's Defensive Line
(4) during the ongoing struggle in (3) Badgley approached the place holder to kick the ball
(5) Badgley kicked the ball
(6) As Badgley kicked the ball, one of the FAU Defensive players jumped real high.
(7) FAU's Defensive player jumped so high he blocked the FG attempt by Badgley


That pretty much covers it. I'm sure you'll let me know if I missed something.

Ill let you know when you actually understand something.
 
Back
Top