mossmadness
"Couldn't" Care Less.
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 6,094
TOP DBS (not based on size smh for all you fools that just look at size)
1.JOBE
2.CAMPBELL
3.Surtain
4.Hall
5.Samuel
6.Blades
7.Patterson
8.Russel
9.Ivey
10. Freison
Just. Stop.
TOP DBS (not based on size smh for all you fools that just look at size)
1.JOBE
2.CAMPBELL
3.Surtain
4.Hall
5.Samuel
6.Blades
7.Patterson
8.Russel
9.Ivey
10. Freison
Well said ori.
I think Ivey could be next.
Are you dumb? Ivey is a better CB prospect than Jobe ffs. lol. Only Campbell and Blades are better on our board.
Listen Mr. Ivey. Your son has 8 offers, five Power 5 offers, 2 group 5 offers and one from a D2 school.
He better Hope Samuel, Surtain, and Campbell don't want in.
Surtain is going to FSU. And Samuel isn't better than Ivey. Campbell has a spot here no matter what. And if Tyreke wants in, he also has a spot.
Burns shouldn't be on a football scholarship either. Only other DB I can see walking away is Russell (To UF) and Jobe (To Bama)
Samuel is LIGHT YEARS better than Ivey. It's not even close.
I understand there are always going to be people that don't agree but I will take the word from the coaches of his 40 plus P5 offers.
Well said ori.
I think Ivey could be next.
Are you dumb? Ivey is a better CB prospect than Jobe ffs. lol. Only Campbell and Blades are better on our board.
Listen Mr. Ivey. Your son has 8 offers, five Power 5 offers, 2 group 5 offers and one from a D2 school.
He better Hope Samuel, Surtain, and Campbell don't want in.
Surtain is going to FSU. And Samuel isn't better than Ivey. Campbell has a spot here no matter what. And if Tyreke wants in, he also has a spot.
Burns shouldn't be on a football scholarship either. Only other DB I can see walking away is Russell (To UF) and Jobe (To Bama)
Samuel is LIGHT YEARS better than Ivey. It's not even close.
I understand there are always going to be people that don't agree but I will take the word from the coaches of his 40 plus P5 offers.
Funny how you say Samuel is built like a middle schooler but rarely gives up anything against high school wideouts...again people...get pass the height....trust your eyes and forgot b.s. measurables....look at his offers....look at the film...Ivey is good...but because he's listed at 6'1" doesn't make him better...where's the proof that he is better....
Jobe is the best CB prospect in the country bar none.
Tyson Campbell is a close second.
For those saying he is not elite go ask elite wr's Xavier Williams where Jalen had 2 INTS including pick 6 vs him and also locked down DJ MATTHEWS go ahead and ask them and see if they say hes not elite.
I understand it's easy to bash the kid because he seems to be playing games, but when you say that Ivey is a better prospect than Jobe you're embarrassing yourself.
C'mon.
I understand it's easy to bash the kid because he seems to be playing games, but when you say that Ivey is a better prospect than Jobe you're embarrassing yourself.
C'mon.
I'm talking as a CB prospect. Ivey blows Jobe away, mainly because of height (Jobe measured in at 5'11 Ivey is a legit 6'1), speed (Ivey plays like a 4.5 kid, Jobe is more of a 4.55-4.60 kid), and hips (Jobe kinda stiff). Jobe is the best safety prospect on our board though. Campbell is the best OVERALL prospect and could play either position effortlessly.
For those saying he is not elite go ask elite wr's Xavier Williams where Jalen had 2 INTS including pick 6 vs him and also locked down DJ MATTHEWS go ahead and ask them and see if they say hes not elite.
Here's the thing ...most of these guys who are saying he sucks, we don't need him etc. have never seen this dude play. They don't know **** about the kid except he has dreads, is black and has 3 stars. Anyways, question for you.... do you know the kid?
For those saying he is not elite go ask elite wr's Xavier Williams where Jalen had 2 INTS including pick 6 vs him and also locked down DJ MATTHEWS go ahead and ask them and see if they say hes not elite.
Here's the thing ...most of these guys who are saying he sucks, we don't need him etc. have never seen this dude play. They don't know **** about the kid except he has dreads, is black and has 3 stars. Anyways, question for you.... do you know the kid?
No, just have seen his tapes and hear about him
He's Electric , undersized but makes up for it, loves to hit , very physical.. very competitive and like I said he makes plays and is lock down , has great instincts and is a dog and thats something you cant teach.
I dont think he committed to al golden , he committed to Miami and thats not a reason why i think we should keep him. Should of kept him because he would be making plays vs FSU ETC... He would of thrived with this new coaching staff.
It doesn't really hurt us because of the talent we have and will get but we could have definitely utilized him.
But he is the type of player we need. He is a football player , playmaker . str8 DOG like how the canes use to be.
This board is funny.......... we have signed plenty of players that other teams dropped.....and then we proceeded toa ct like we just took them from them....we have also had players leave us...and then act like we dropped them...who cares
TOP DBS (not based on size smh for all you fools that just look at size)
1.JOBE
2.CAMPBELL
3.Surtain
4.Hall
5.Samuel
6.Blades
7.Patterson
8.Russel
9.Ivey
10. Freison
lol awful.
Campbell (can play either position effortlessly)
Blades (ditto)
Jobe (best safety)
Ivey (elite CB)
Johnson (underrated AF on here)
Frierson (ditto)
Hall (great safety, can't play CB)
Samuel (tiny, can't ever play S)
Russell (lack of CB skills and not ideal size at S brings him down)
Surtain (next Larry Brown)
Patterson is better as a scatback.
was committed day 1 , a true cane and a playmaker , this is sad if its true
Here's the problem, in today's environment.
Kids want to feel special, the like it when programs identify them as a freshman or sophomore. But the reality is, some kids bloom early, and then do not develop further. This happens in the 4-year window of HS, it happens in the 4 or 5 year window of college, and it happens in the NFL. Sometimes a kid stands out from the crowd at one point (early growth spurt, beats out players with inferior coaching, etc.), and then the crowd catches up. Very hard to predict.
I admire the kid's loyalty, but if you follow that trait alone, then we are eventually going to have a certain percentage of the team who, while loyal, are no longer the dominant talents that they once were as HS freshmen or sophomores. Call them Al Bundy. "I once scored 4 TDs in one game." Yeah, that's great, but how about today?
I believe that, at every level, you have to have standards, and if a player hits a developmental wall, you are doing him a favor by allowing him to find his proper level of competition. If you put loyalty first, then you will end up sticking a kid at the end of the bench, never giving him reps, but remaining "loyal" to the promise that he showed years earlier.
Right now, that kid Forrest Lamp is probably going to be a first round selection. A few people mentioned him during recruiting, he had a funny name, he was a "diamond in the rough", etc. But how do we know he would have developed at Miami? Maybe he would not have been a good fit with Kehoe. Maybe the kid needed the reps that a "lower-level program" could give him, and he could develop confidence beating out kids within his skill range instead of going up against 4 star opposition as a freshman and getting discouraged.
I wish Patterson the best, I'd love to see him prove us "wrong", but with only so many spots, we have to make the best decisions we can with the evidence that we have now. And if the staff says "pass", I trust their judgement at this point.
Shouldn't have waited for Ivins to break the story today, peat.He's been dropped for months