- Joined
- Feb 1, 2018
- Messages
- 13,654
Just goes to show that Notre Lame isn’t as smart as they think they are.
It's not 4. 7 new players tested positive yesterday PLUS the ones who tested positive on Friday.They both have a bye on 10/3.
what I don’t understand beyond the decisions of just letting healthy people play football, is why can’t notre dame just have the 4 people who tested positive sit out?
I don’t know the details of this, but assuming that it’s only six players between those who are infected AND the contact tracing sit-outs, why would you need to postpone the game?
You literally have a team with close to 100 players including scholarship and walkons.
At the very least even if you have 10 guys out, you’re going to have somewhere between 80 and 90 available bodies.
Have people play out of position, but play the fūcking game.
no. 7 new positives PLUS the ones from last week.I thought it was six positive tests PLUS seven contract-tracing quarantines.
I don't know that Notre Dame has "close to 100 players" including walk-ons. They aren't Nebraska.
But I would LOVE to see Notre Dame forced to play a bunch of Rudy's.
no. 7 new positives PLUS the ones from last week.
From their board:
13 players in self-isolation.
10 in quarantine.
Contact tracing in process
I thought as long as you met the positional requirements, you play?
Unless those requirements have already failed, why cancel the game so early?
+1Witnessing THE dumbest moment in United States history
I thought as long as you met the positional requirements, you play?
Unless those requirements have already failed, why cancel the game so early?
I thought it was six positive tests PLUS seven contract-tracing quarantines.
I don't know that Notre Dame has "close to 100 players" including walk-ons. They aren't Nebraska.
But I would LOVE to see Notre Dame forced to play a bunch of Rudy's.
PS, even my old numbers are wrong. 13 positive tests PLUS 10 contract-tracing quarantines. That's 23 down.
Enjoy every game we get to play.
I get it if the positional numbers don't add up. But 23 is just a number.Not cancelled, postponed.
And October 3 is a week-and-a-half away (both Wake and ND have 10/3 as an open date).
Seems reasonable, particularly if ND can get back the "quarantine" kids who are only being held out as a precaution right now (assuming the reason is due to "exposure" to someone with Covid).
Likely depends on what position, aside from the contact tracing. I think they said each team needs 7-8 OL, as an example. Obviously if it is only 4 people but it is 4 QBs, that would probably pose some issues.They both have a bye on 10/3.
what I don’t understand beyond the decisions of just letting healthy people play football, is why can’t notre dame just have the 4 people who tested positive sit out?
Craziest year ever in the sports industry. No way all these games get played. I'm curious how tiebreakers etc will be determined if everyone can't play the same number of games.