forums

Off-Topic Mass killings

CaneinBroward said:
There are self-hating **** out there. They grew up in an environment where the thought of being *** is worse than being a murderer (and the viral video of this guy's Dad literally fits that description). Their environment tells them being *** is a choice. This would be far from the first time that a *** person or a person questioning his sexuality committed violence on other ****.
Click to expand...
Not saying there isn't... but someone... I think genzcane, said that it was most likely still to be a hate crime. I disagree with the "most likely" part of that. It may be a possibility, but if he's really "non-binary" and going by "they/them"... no, it's not most likely
 
Advertisement
crossover22[]_[] said:
What policies do they support that are far right?

Anyone that believes in individual freedom, family, education, God, and their country is considered far right.


There is no far right representation in our government at any level.
Click to expand...
Hahaha! Now that is the funniest comment I read all day!!!!
 
capone091273 said:
Any Trump supporter is for having an authoritarian government implemented into the United States because all must follow that path instead of having different beliefs.

I truly cannot comprehend how someone who supports Trump cannot see or remove the political blinders from the eyelids, that he was trying to remove the freedom s and rights you believe so much of right out from under your feet.

That's how dictatorships and authoritarian regimes begin that stronghold. Look at how Hungary became a dictatorship over the last decade.
Click to expand...
Are you gonna explain what rights he took away?
 
capone091273 said:
Any Trump supporter is for having an authoritarian government implemented into the United States because all must follow that path instead of having different beliefs…
Click to expand...

This is truly a fūcked up statement.

Show examples or links that prove this.

Otherwise, it’s just straight lies.

Also, who the fūck are you?
 
NC_Canes_11 said:
I wouldn’t click on anything he posts. You’re gonna get a link to a Toobin stroke show with him yelling, “Trump is a dictator” as he finishes.
Click to expand...
toobin.gif
 
Advertisement
NC_Canes_11 said:
Can you show me the document where Abortion is a right? I’m not sure if you know this, but a court decision does not cement something as a right.
Click to expand...
It was a national "right" before the recent SC decision; now that "right" doesn't exist in many states and is threatened in others. The loss of that "right" brought a lot of women to the polls to vote against R candidates, if you hadn't noticed.
 
hotshot said:
It was a national "right" before the recent SC decision; now that "right" doesn't exist in many states and is threatened in others. The loss of that "right" brought a lot of women to the polls to vote against R candidates, if you hadn't noticed.
Click to expand...
It was not a “right.” It was just legal. Huge difference.
 
Advertisement
hotshot said:
Whatever you wanna call it. It was available to women nationally for almost 50 years. Now it's not, and women affected negatively can thank Trump's SC appointees for that limitation of their personal options.
Click to expand...
“Whatever I wanna call it.” You mean the truth. Driving, smoking indoors, drinking at 18, Abortion, and 99% of other things are legal or used to be. You know what they have in common? They aren’t rights. If they were rights SCOTUS couldn’t take them away from you.
 
NC_Canes_11 said:
“Whatever I wanna call it.” You mean the truth. Driving, smoking indoors, drinking at 18, Abortion, and 99% of other things are legal or used to be. You know what they have in common? They aren’t rights. If they were rights SCOTUS couldn’t take them away from you.
Click to expand...
You are right. It is not a formally written right. However, for 50 years it was determined to be protected as part of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment and its "Right to Privacy". So, yes it was determined to be a right by one SCOTUS and 50 years later that decision was reversed by another SCOTUS. The SCOTUS giveth and SCOTUS can taketh away.

So, whatever you want to call it, it pi$$ed off enough women to make the "red wave" a "red trickle".
 
CaneinBroward said:
You are right. It is not a formally written right. However, for 50 years it was determined to be protected as part of the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment and its "Right to Privacy". So, yes it was determined to be a right by one SCOTUS and 50 years later that decision was reversed by another SCOTUS. The SCOTUS giveth and SCOTUS can taketh away.

So, whatever you want to call it, it pi$$ed off enough women to make the "red wave" a "red trickle".
Click to expand...
“Determined to be a protected” is not a right.

Idk why this is so hard to understand. For all intents and purposes, it was an Executive Order. And just like EO’s, if they aren’t passed into law, they are thrown into the garbage by the next admin.
 
Back
Top