Our only hope......
Been said that after Clemson when we stumbled and bumbled with UVAPlay well with Emory and losing is ok. Losing is not ok playing a 11 int turnover machine
Before UVA, during the UVA game,or before the NC State game. Take your pick. I'd accept either.
They couldn't have started TVD today.You don’t start a true freshman on the road in a game like this. No clue coaching staff strikes again…….
Why are you acting as if TVD won the game for us or pulled off some heroics to seal the game. We won in spite of himSo what happens if Emory would have lost to UVA? Van Dyke won that game so not understanding the logic
We can't really do anything but be conservative. The aggression has to be perfectly timed, and confusing for the defense.Clemsons offense kept us in the game. FSUs offense is another league esp w their receivers back. we can't be conservative today.
I must have missed the part where I said please tell me your opinionI disagree because youre playing the result and actually think that in a vacuum, a true freshman QB gave us a better chance to win that game. The staff had no choice at this point
He won’t start at SMU over Preston Stone. Will probably end op at a non-Michigan/Ohio St/PSU Big 10 school or a northern based ACC school imo
That's the only argument to be made here. It was 10-6 at half and we missed a FG on our 1st drive of the 3rd quarter. Went 3 and out twice and then turned over on downs after getting inside of their 25. We probably should have been up.I think logical move would have been playing Williams in 2nd half at NC St. TVD looked absolutely terrible in the first half.
Something was clearly wrong with him and that’s why he sat out the Clemson game. Something was still clearly wrong with him the next game. And the game after that.I'll be the first to captain the 'staff should have started Emory after UVA' boat should Emory beat and/or go off this afternoon. If we lose the UVA game, then by all means, the change should have taken place, but when was the last time a QB was benched following a win?
Also, it was 10-6 at half last week and 10 second-half points probably wins that game. You dolts who've likely never had to make important decisions at their jobs before seem to forget that Van Dyke looked like an all-conference QB no less than 6 weeks ago, so was it unreasonable to assume that he couldn't muster 10 points? Again, you're all playing the result.
How about you fist yourself then tough guyI must have missed the part where I said please tell me your opinion
When I say I genuinely don’t give a **** what you think, that doesn’t even begin to sum it up