- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
- Messages
- 3,354
I don't care. He had his chance to stay for his senior season, but opted out. Is what it is.
I don't think Kaaya is "un-athletic" or that his inability to run was the source of his failure. He just seemed to have no balance, like he suffered from vertigo or something. If an offensive lineman merely bumped into him, he would topple over. He didn't , for the most part, look shell-shocked in the pocket, he was just a weeble - wobble who would tip sideways upon contact.
All this talk about not being in the FSU and GT games, I guess everybody forgot the work Kayaa has put in against GT pass couple years(except his 2 INT game against them), two comeback drive against FSU in multiple years (1 being inept defensive coaching being the downfall, the other being a missed extra point). But you're right...completely would've lost LOL
Lol I'm not even surprised by post like this anymore
Such bad guidance in Brad's corner. Could be in line for a playoff bid with him under helm. Not like he NEEDED to come out either, his family has money. SMH
Kaaya was 0-for-career in games when the Canes were down at the half. Rosier is 3-0 in them.
I'm convinced that we'd be 3-2 with Kaaya back.
I don't get the usage of these selective stats to bash Kaaya.
We were down to F$U at the half this year because Rosier missed on a bunch of passes. If Kaaya is in the game, how do you know that we wouldn't have a halftime lead?
Look, I understand not thinking Kaaya is the best ever, but guys do improve with age (and better coaching) and if we had Kaaya instead of Rosier, we might have had bigger victories over both F$U and GaTech.
It's just a big unknown, and there is no need to trash Kaaya because he had to attempt a bunch of comebacks during 2 years under Golden.
I don't think Kaaya is "un-athletic" or that his inability to run was the source of his failure. He just seemed to have no balance, like he suffered from vertigo or something. If an offensive lineman merely bumped into him, he would topple over. He didn't , for the most part, look shell-shocked in the pocket, he was just a weeble - wobble who would tip sideways upon contact.
I don't know where this analyst got the numbers, but he says Kaaya runs a 4.8 40.
Brad Kaaya - 16096 | Draft Analyst
If true, that is a respectable number. Seems hard to believe though.
Such bad guidance in Brad's corner. Could be in line for a playoff bid with him under helm. Not like he NEEDED to come out either, his family has money. SMH
Kaaya was 0-for-career in games when the Canes were down at the half. Rosier is 3-0 in them.
I'm convinced that we'd be 3-2 with Kaaya back.
I don't get the usage of these selective stats to bash Kaaya.
We were down to F$U at the half this year because Rosier missed on a bunch of passes. If Kaaya is in the game, how do you know that we wouldn't have a halftime lead?
Look, I understand not thinking Kaaya is the best ever, but guys do improve with age (and better coaching) and if we had Kaaya instead of Rosier, we might have had bigger victories over both F$U and GaTech.
It's just a big unknown, and there is no need to trash Kaaya because he had to attempt a bunch of comebacks during 2 years under Golden.
Kaaya led the game "tying" drive against FSU last year so it's not like he has no clutch factor. But watching the replay you can definitely tell he's rattled. Rosier appears to never be rattled.
Poor guy. Maybe he should become a GA somewhere.
I want to feel bad for the kid, but I don't.
He apparently had plenty of people suggesting he go back to school, but he was stubborn.
That whole Brad top 5 pick talk before his junior year got to his head and he believed his own hype.
Wishing him luck nonetheless
Lmao what hype?? Oh the delusional Canesinsight.com hype smh I guess he was a member on this site or something bc there was never any real hype except for what some cane fans believed smh
I don't think Kaaya is "un-athletic" or that his inability to run was the source of his failure. He just seemed to have no balance, like he suffered from vertigo or something. If an offensive lineman merely bumped into him, he would topple over. He didn't , for the most part, look shell-shocked in the pocket, he was just a weeble - wobble who would tip sideways upon contact.
I'm really wondering who was advising him the entire process. He didn't participate in a single combine workout which killed any chance he had to possibly squash the unathletic QB tag from following him around.
I can't imagine he would have done worse than guys like Cooper Rush and DeShone Kizer in a lot of those drills.
His measurables were solid compared to guys like Mahomes, Trubinsky and Watson.
Dude just seemed to make every mistake possible from declaring forward.
Such bad guidance in Brad's corner. Could be in line for a playoff bid with him under helm. Not like he NEEDED to come out either, his family has money. SMH
Kaaya was 0-for-career in games when the Canes were down at the half. Rosier is 3-0 in them.
I'm convinced that we'd be 3-2 with Kaaya back.
I don't get the usage of these selective stats to bash Kaaya.
We were down to F$U at the half this year because Rosier missed on a bunch of passes. If Kaaya is in the game, how do you know that we wouldn't have a halftime lead?
Look, I understand not thinking Kaaya is the best ever, but guys do improve with age (and better coaching) and if we had Kaaya instead of Rosier, we might have had bigger victories over both F$U and GaTech.
It's just a big unknown, and there is no need to trash Kaaya because he had to attempt a bunch of comebacks during 2 years under Golden.
Kaaya led the game "tying" drive against FSU last year so it's not like he has no clutch factor. But watching the replay you can definitely tell he's rattled. Rosier appears to never be rattled.
Such bad guidance in Brad's corner. Could be in line for a playoff bid with him under helm. Not like he NEEDED to come out either, his family has money. SMH
Kaaya was 0-for-career in games when the Canes were down at the half. Rosier is 3-0 in them.
I'm convinced that we'd be 3-2 with Kaaya back.
I don't get the usage of these selective stats to bash Kaaya.
We were down to F$U at the half this year because Rosier missed on a bunch of passes. If Kaaya is in the game, how do you know that we wouldn't have a halftime lead?
Look, I understand not thinking Kaaya is the best ever, but guys do improve with age (and better coaching) and if we had Kaaya instead of Rosier, we might have had bigger victories over both F$U and GaTech.
It's just a big unknown, and there is no need to trash Kaaya because he had to attempt a bunch of comebacks during 2 years under Golden.
Kaaya led the game "tying" drive against FSU last year so it's not like he has no clutch factor. But watching the replay you can definitely tell he's rattled. Rosier appears to never be rattled.
Again, I am not arguing with that point, that Rosier might be a bit more poised under pressure.
But the STATS that were cited had to do with second-half comebacks. And we have NO IDEA whether second-half comebacks are even necessary with Kaaya playing in place of Rosier this year.
Kaaya's decision to leave was a poor one, and I think he would have improved significantly with another year of coaching. He was dealt a bad hand for his first two years, though.