- Joined
- Jan 19, 2014
- Messages
- 8,229
They can probably sell him for more some place else. They probably want us to take the one from Temple…Can you share why the search firm is adamant he not be interviewed?
They can probably sell him for more some place else. They probably want us to take the one from Temple…Can you share why the search firm is adamant he not be interviewed?
bottom feeders. all of them.I don’t know if anybody here has worked with a search firm.
I have.
The one thing about the search firms that I am familiar with, is that most of the time, in fact probably all of the time, they have a stable of candidates, and there are definitely financial incentives to hiring one of their candidates.
I think most people in the business world realize that search firms aren’t necessarily honest brokers, but you use them to widen the pool of candidates to look at and possibly interview.
My mantra in hiring people has always been that the larger pool of candidates that I have to choose from, the greater chance I have for making a correct decision.
So that’s why you use a search firm even though they’re not necessarily a 100% honest broker. To widen your pool of possible candidates.
He’s busy starting threads about our players (who may leave when the current coach is retained)The OP is the OG Insider.
I’m a CPA i know how it works lol you’re right though… it’s different in the fact that there’s no regulating body and no standards to follow. And they’re not actually signing off.
I’m sure there’s some basis to sue in the contract if something comes up from said candidate that wasn’t uncovered in their work. I’m sure there’s a way around that if the school wants Jurich they can clear them of any wrongdoing related to him.. but they’re not willing to put their name on him without that caveat in the contract. Especially when it comes to an FBI investigation - idk how many of those details and results are readily available to them. Tells me they’re not willing to say it’s settled and over with.
Helpful context. Thank you. If they're financial interests (push their candidates) are in conflict with our interests (hire the best candidate), then we should can them.I don’t know if anybody here has worked with a search firm.
I have.
The one thing about the search firms that I am familiar with, is that most of the time, in fact probably all of the time, they have a stable of candidates, and there are definitely financial incentives to hiring one of their candidates.
I think most people in the business world realize that search firms aren’t necessarily honest brokers, but you use them to widen the pool of candidates to look at and possibly interview.
My mantra in hiring people has always been that the larger pool of candidates that I have to choose from, the greater chance I have for making a correct decision.
So that’s why you use a search firm even though they’re not necessarily a 100% honest broker. To widen your pool of possible candidates.
Again, no insider info, but I am still certain it's about the money. If they resign, they'll probably take their candidates with them. So no one wants that. Miami just needs to give them more of the vig if they buy Jurich and the search firm will snap into place. ... Still shows how badly this whole situation has been mismanaged.
This. Just go read their website and what they "prioritize", and Jurich probably doesn't get past their screening.May not be entirely true. They may be serving the interests of *some* of the BOT.
True. Wonder how they were selected and who recommended them?May not be entirely true. They may be serving the interests of *some* of the BOT.
That’s exactly what I was looking up - Louisville seems to have cleared it from their end but never saw anything from FBI or NCAA.Yep, I'm a tax JD/CPA as well.
I posted a question in another thread, based on reading another poster's post saying that the FBI/NCAA investigation is not fully and finally over yet. Never got a direct response to the question.
BoomI don’t know if anybody here has worked with a search firm.
I have.
The one thing about the search firms that I am familiar with, is that most of the time, in fact probably all of the time, they have a stable of candidates, and there are definitely financial incentives to hiring one of their candidates.
I think most people in the business world realize that search firms aren’t necessarily honest brokers, but you use them to widen the pool of candidates to look at and possibly interview.
My mantra in hiring people has always been that the larger pool of candidates that I have to choose from, the greater chance I have for making a correct decision.
So that’s why you use a search firm even though they’re not necessarily a 100% honest broker. To widen your pool of possible candidates.
Right there’s no licensure or regulating body but there’s a reputation and there’s grounds to sue in the contract based on underlying work performed.Not asking them to sign off an put their license on the line. Completely different.