I know but he ghosted us after the first post.The OP is the OG Insider.
Jesus
So no Jurich, probably no Highsmith
And I wouldn’t be surprised if we start trending towards giving Manny another year
Unbelievable
Are you guys going to sodomize Turnkey on twitter the way you did Epstein? I'm not advocating for it, just want plan my afternoon accordingly.
LOL at securing Mario, we can't even make a proper AD search.Florida is about to hire Napier. While it’s yet to be seen how good he is once he steps into the SEC, securing Mario now is a major leg up on out recruiting them while kids wait to see what he can do.
It’s a **** show but I still think there’s no way manny’s back. It would have to be one stupid ADJesus
So no Jurich, probably no Highsmith
And I wouldn’t be surprised if we start trending towards giving Manny another year
Unbelievable
Wait a minute...who is paying whom here? What do they care?
A lot of us here on this board, LOLYep, I'm a tax JD/CPA as well.
I posted a question in another thread, based on reading another poster's post saying that the FBI/NCAA investigation is not fully and finally over yet. Never got a direct response to the question.
Sounds like the firm believes that this would impact their reputation. Frankly, it's their right to resign over this.
I have never been involved in using a search firm to find an executive but I have worked with engineering firms on projects. I would use the firm to come up with a list of potential candidates and then see which candidates fall on both lists and why candidates made one list and not the other. The idea that we have to select one of their candidates is dumb and the idea that we wasted our money by not selecting one of their candidates is also dumb. The goal should be to have an extra set of non-bias eyes conducting a search and providing feedback you may not have considered. This decision belongs to Julio Frenk and the Board of Trustees and no one else.
I don’t know if anybody here has worked with a search firm.
I have.
The one thing about the search firms that I am familiar with, is that most of the time, in fact probably all of the time, they have a stable of candidates, and there are definitely financial incentives to hiring one of their candidates.
I think most people in the business world realize that search firms aren’t necessarily honest brokers, but you use them to widen the pool of candidates to look at and possibly interview.
My mantra in hiring people has always been that the larger pool of candidates that I have to choose from, the greater chance I have for making a correct decision.
So that’s why you use a search firm even though they’re not necessarily a 100% honest broker. To widen your pool of possible candidates.

Dan Sileo Jr concurs…"AD is secured"
I don’t know if anybody here has worked with a search firm.
I have.
The one thing about the search firms that I am familiar with, is that most of the time, in fact probably all of the time, they have a stable of candidates, and there are definitely financial incentives to hiring one of their candidates.
I think most people in the business world realize that search firms aren’t necessarily honest brokers, but you use them to widen the pool of candidates to look at and possibly interview.
My mantra in hiring people has always been that the larger pool of candidates that I have to choose from, the greater chance I have for making a correct decision.
So that’s why you use a search firm even though they’re not necessarily a 100% honest broker. To widen your pool of possible candidates.