Jurich

Advertisement
I don’t know if anybody here has worked with a search firm.

I have.

The one thing about the search firms that I am familiar with, is that most of the time, in fact probably all of the time, they have a stable of candidates, and there are definitely financial incentives to hiring one of their candidates.

I think most people in the business world realize that search firms aren’t necessarily honest brokers, but you use them to widen the pool of candidates to look at and possibly interview.

My mantra in hiring people has always been that the larger pool of candidates that I have to choose from, the greater chance I have for making a correct decision.

So that’s why you use a search firm even though they’re not necessarily a 100% honest broker. To widen your pool of possible candidates.
bottom feeders. all of them.

they are used car salesman in a human meat market...
 
I’m a CPA i know how it works lol you’re right though… it’s different in the fact that there’s no regulating body and no standards to follow. And they’re not actually signing off.

I’m sure there’s some basis to sue in the contract if something comes up from said candidate that wasn’t uncovered in their work. I’m sure there’s a way around that if the school wants Jurich they can clear them of any wrongdoing related to him.. but they’re not willing to put their name on him without that caveat in the contract. Especially when it comes to an FBI investigation - idk how many of those details and results are readily available to them. Tells me they’re not willing to say it’s settled and over with.


Yep, I'm a tax JD/CPA as well.

I posted a question in another thread, based on reading another poster's post saying that the FBI/NCAA investigation is not fully and finally over yet. Never got a direct response to the question.
 
I don’t know if anybody here has worked with a search firm.

I have.

The one thing about the search firms that I am familiar with, is that most of the time, in fact probably all of the time, they have a stable of candidates, and there are definitely financial incentives to hiring one of their candidates.

I think most people in the business world realize that search firms aren’t necessarily honest brokers, but you use them to widen the pool of candidates to look at and possibly interview.

My mantra in hiring people has always been that the larger pool of candidates that I have to choose from, the greater chance I have for making a correct decision.

So that’s why you use a search firm even though they’re not necessarily a 100% honest broker. To widen your pool of possible candidates.
Helpful context. Thank you. If they're financial interests (push their candidates) are in conflict with our interests (hire the best candidate), then we should can them.
 

By chance are you aware if this is directly about Jurich or just UM interviewing someone in general?? Meaning The search firm feels they were hired to do a job but UM is somewhat undercutting them....
 
Advertisement
Again, no insider info, but I am still certain it's about the money. If they resign, they'll probably take their candidates with them. So no one wants that. Miami just needs to give them more of the vig if they buy Jurich and the search firm will snap into place. ... Still shows how badly this whole situation has been mismanaged.

No AD candidate needs a search firm to discuss job opportunities. Search firms get a flat fee to do all the background checks, communications, inside info, etc. A search firm doesn't take candidates with them. Any firm can contact those same people.

Since the fee is usually agreed to upfront, it appears more about image than money. Someone in that company must not want their business/reputation associated with Jurich's past.
 
So the search firm is going to resign after the hire has been made? Sounds legit
 
Yep, I'm a tax JD/CPA as well.

I posted a question in another thread, based on reading another poster's post saying that the FBI/NCAA investigation is not fully and finally over yet. Never got a direct response to the question.
That’s exactly what I was looking up - Louisville seems to have cleared it from their end but never saw anything from FBI or NCAA.
 
Advertisement
I don’t know if anybody here has worked with a search firm.

I have.

The one thing about the search firms that I am familiar with, is that most of the time, in fact probably all of the time, they have a stable of candidates, and there are definitely financial incentives to hiring one of their candidates.

I think most people in the business world realize that search firms aren’t necessarily honest brokers, but you use them to widen the pool of candidates to look at and possibly interview.

My mantra in hiring people has always been that the larger pool of candidates that I have to choose from, the greater chance I have for making a correct decision.

So that’s why you use a search firm even though they’re not necessarily a 100% honest broker. To widen your pool of possible candidates.
Boom

The search firm will have its network and its mutually beneficial for them to have certain people get hired for the job

Not necessarily a bad thing to plug into someone else’s network but that **** goes bad quickly
 
So we are in contact with Jurich

Jim Carrey Chance GIF
 
Not asking them to sign off an put their license on the line. Completely different.
Right there’s no licensure or regulating body but there’s a reputation and there’s grounds to sue in the contract based on underlying work performed.

Open/paused FBI/NCAA investigation is probably a no go for them in that regard.
 
Back
Top